← Back to home

Palisades Charter High SchoolNon-Profit

EIN: 920184898

UEI: MMYSCPSD58M5

Audited by: Christy White Inc

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Palisades Charter High School10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION$1,614,200 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 19, 2026 (80 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$3,250,658 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2025 — management decision was due January 1, 2026.

FY 2023-06-30

$2,656,482 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 28, 2024 — management decision was due November 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,370,058 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

2022-002
Equipment & Real Property
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Charter used funding from the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) Fund program for one capital expenditure. The funding terms and conditions require the Charter to obtain approval from the funding agency prior to incurring the expenditure. The Charter was unable to provide documentation that the required approval was obtained. Cause: The error is a result of the Charter not understanding the terms and conditions of the requirements of the grant agreement. Effect: The effect of not obtaining the required approval resulted in a total of $90,000 in allowable ESF expenditures. Additionally, this error could result in potential loss of funding under this grant. Context: Due to new COVID-19 Emergency Acts Funding this fiscal year, the Charter was unaware this was a requirement for ESSER and GEER. Questioned Costs: The questioned cost is $90,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Charter develop and implement policies and procedures whereby staff obtain an understanding of the funding terms and conditions of all grants in order to prevent future violations of compliance requirements. We recommend the Charter develop and implement policies and procedures whereby staff obtain an understanding of the funding terms and conditions of all grants in order to prevent future violations of compliance requirements. Management should obtain proper training through the appropriate regulatory and granting agencies.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2022-002: EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND DISCRETIONARY GRANTS? EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (50000 & 30000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425 and 84.425C - Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund and Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Consistent with 2 CFR section 200.311 (real property), section 200.313 (equipment), and section 200.439 (equipment and other capital expenditures) Education Stabilization Funds (ESF) may be used to purchase equipment. Capital expenditures for general and special purpose equipment purchases are subject to prior approval by Education Department (ED) or the pass-through entity. In addition, with prior approval by the ED or the pass-through entity, recipients and subrecipients may use ESF funds to purchase real property and perform construction for improvements to land, buildings, or equipment that meet the overall purpose of the ESF program, which is ?to prevent, prepare for, and respond to? the COVID-19 pandemic. Condition: The Charter used funding from the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) Fund program for one capital expenditure. The funding terms and conditions require the Charter to obtain approval from the funding agency prior to incurring the expenditure. The Charter was unable to provide documentation that the required approval was obtained. Cause: The error is a result of the Charter not understanding the terms and conditions of the requirements of the grant agreement. Effect: The effect of not obtaining the required approval resulted in a total of $90,000 in allowable ESF expenditures. Additionally, this error could result in potential loss of funding under this grant. Context: Due to new COVID-19 Emergency Acts Funding this fiscal year, the Charter was unaware this was a requirement for ESSER and GEER. Questioned Costs: The questioned cost is $90,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Charter develop and implement policies and procedures whereby staff obtain an understanding of the funding terms and conditions of all grants in order to prevent future violations of compliance requirements. We recommend the Charter develop and implement policies and procedures whereby staff obtain an understanding of the funding terms and conditions of all grants in order to prevent future violations of compliance requirements. Management should obtain proper training through the appropriate regulatory and granting agencies.

Corrective Action Plan

RESPONSE TO AUDIT FINDING #2022-002: EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND DISCRETIONARY GRANTS- SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS (50000) The charter has already submitted the capital expenditure request form to COE and is awaiting approval. The charter will review all required compliance requirements for all new federal funding before purchases are made. The charter anticipates receiving the approval by December 31, 2023.

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,385,793 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2022 — management decision was due August 9, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,243,671 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 12, 2021 — management decision was due October 12, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,393,072 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,317,930 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2019 — management decision was due August 4, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,190,729 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2018 — management decision was due July 7, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,118,372 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2016 — management decision was due June 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.