North Slope BoroughLocal Government

EIN: 920042378

UEI: C9NWKJZ37GX3

Audited by: KPMG LLP

Oversight agency: 15 [Department of the Interior]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

North Slope Borough10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$27.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$27,675,363 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 12, 2026 (75 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Inadequate Internal Controls over Grant-Funded Equipment Maintenance and Inventory and Noncompliance with Biennial Inventory Count Requirement Name of Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Name of applicable pass-through entity: State of Alaska, Department of Community and Economic Development Federal program: National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Assistance listing number: 15.439 Federal Award Number(s): Various Federal award period: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with property records at least once every two years and 2 CFR 200.313(d)(4) states that adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition Found: The Borough was unable to provide sufficient and appropriate evidence, including complete documentation, to demonstrate compliance with the biennial physical inventory requirement for grant funded equipment under the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirements. Specifically, no documentation was available to support whether a physical inventory was conducted in FY2024, and the FY2025 inventory was incomplete. Additionally, there was not a control designed to ensure equipment maintenance was performed as scheduled. Cause: While the Borough had an established general policy regarding physical inventory counts and equipment maintenance, the policy lacked sufficient detail to ensure consistent implementation. Specifically, the policy did not clearly define roles and responsibilities for conducting inventory counts, establish procedures for performing the inventory counts and the timing of such counts, or identify the individuals responsible for reviewing and approving inventory results and maintenance logs. In addition, organizational changes during FY2024, including the separation of the Administration and Finance departments, contributed to a breakdown in the continuity of inventory management functions. Staff turnover and a lack of training for new employees further contributed to the insufficient execution of required inventory management procedures. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to establish effective internal controls over the biennial inventory count and maintenance requirements increases the risk that grant-funded equipment may be lost, misappropriated, or not properly accounted for, which could result in questioned costs, inaccurate financial reporting, and noncompliance with federal award requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the Borough establish internal controls to ensure biennial inventory counts for grant-funded equipment are properly conducted, documented, and formally reconciled with the property records and to ensure equipment is kept in good condition. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. In response, management will continue to implement additional controls to strengthen compliance with equipment and real property management requirements, including improvements to inventory procedures, documentation practices, and oversight. The Department of Finance will work in coordination with the Department of Administration to provide training to all relevant departments on federal guidelines and compliance requirements related to assets purchased with federal grant funds. Management will continue to monitor these controls and take further corrective action, as necessary, to ensure ongoing compliance with applicable federal requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Inadequate Internal Controls over Grant-Funded Equipment Maintenance and Inventory and Noncompliance with Biennial Inventory Count Requirement Name of Federal agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Name of applicable pass-through entity: State of Alaska, Department of Community and Economic Development Federal program: National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Assistance listing number: 15.439 Federal Award Number(s): Various Federal award period: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(2), a physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with property records at least once every two years and 2 CFR 200.313(d)(4) states that adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition Found: The Borough was unable to provide sufficient and appropriate evidence, including complete documentation, to demonstrate compliance with the biennial physical inventory requirement for grant funded equipment under the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirements. Specifically, no documentation was available to support whether a physical inventory was conducted in FY2024, and the FY2025 inventory was incomplete. Additionally, there was not a control designed to ensure equipment maintenance was performed as scheduled. Cause: While the Borough had an established general policy regarding physical inventory counts and equipment maintenance, the policy lacked sufficient detail to ensure consistent implementation. Specifically, the policy did not clearly define roles and responsibilities for conducting inventory counts, establish procedures for performing the inventory counts and the timing of such counts, or identify the individuals responsible for reviewing and approving inventory results and maintenance logs. In addition, organizational changes during FY2024, including the separation of the Administration and Finance departments, contributed to a breakdown in the continuity of inventory management functions. Staff turnover and a lack of training for new employees further contributed to the insufficient execution of required inventory management procedures. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to establish effective internal controls over the biennial inventory count and maintenance requirements increases the risk that grant-funded equipment may be lost, misappropriated, or not properly accounted for, which could result in questioned costs, inaccurate financial reporting, and noncompliance with federal award requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the Borough establish internal controls to ensure biennial inventory counts for grant-funded equipment are properly conducted, documented, and formally reconciled with the property records and to ensure equipment is kept in good condition. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. In response, management will continue to implement additional controls to strengthen compliance with equipment and real property management requirements, including improvements to inventory procedures, documentation practices, and oversight. The Department of Finance will work in coordination with the Department of Administration to provide training to all relevant departments on federal guidelines and compliance requirements related to assets purchased with federal grant funds. Management will continue to monitor these controls and take further corrective action, as necessary, to ensure ongoing compliance with applicable federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

The Department of Finance will work with the Department of Administration to obtain the necessary documentation of the required physical inventory of all grant funded property and equipment, the reconciliation of the physical inventory to property records, and the equipment maintenance logs. Training for all employees responsible for these activities will be provided as deemed necessary. Additionally, the Department of Finance will provide a formal memorandum to all of the Borough departments outlining the federal requirements governing the purchase, management, inventory, use and disposition of assets acquired with federal grant funds in accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200.

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$28,170,315 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2025 — management decision was due December 4, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.510(b), a recipient of federal awards is required to prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the entity’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200 502. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure federal expenditures are accurately reported on the SEFA and information provided for audit purposes is complete and accurate. Condition Found: The Borough did not have adequate internal controls related to the reporting of expenditures on the SEFA for the Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund. Specifically, the Borough’s did not have a control in place to review expenditures that were incurred, but not yet reported to the grantor, to ensure proper reporting on the SEFA. As a result, $4,187,325 of Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund expenditures had been excluded from the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: In discussing these conditions with the Borough, they stated that the Borough consistently followed a policy to report expenditures when expenditures are reported to the grantor. Management did not have a control in place to review the unreported expenditures for proper inclusion in the SEFA, if material. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to establish effective internal controls regarding financial reporting for the preparation of the SEFA may result in inappropriate application of audit requirements. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit.Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the Borough establish internal controls to ensure expenditures are accurately reported on the SEFA and information provided for audit purposes is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management has implemented additional controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of amounts reported in the schedule of federal awards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.510(b), a recipient of federal awards is required to prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the entity’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200 502. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure federal expenditures are accurately reported on the SEFA and information provided for audit purposes is complete and accurate. Condition Found: The Borough did not have adequate internal controls related to the reporting of expenditures on the SEFA for the Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund. Specifically, the Borough’s did not have a control in place to review expenditures that were incurred, but not yet reported to the grantor, to ensure proper reporting on the SEFA. As a result, $4,187,325 of Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund expenditures had been excluded from the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024. Cause: In discussing these conditions with the Borough, they stated that the Borough consistently followed a policy to report expenditures when expenditures are reported to the grantor. Management did not have a control in place to review the unreported expenditures for proper inclusion in the SEFA, if material. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to establish effective internal controls regarding financial reporting for the preparation of the SEFA may result in inappropriate application of audit requirements. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit.Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the Borough establish internal controls to ensure expenditures are accurately reported on the SEFA and information provided for audit purposes is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management has implemented additional controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of amounts reported in the schedule of federal awards.

Corrective Action Plan

: Borough Finance staff have redesigned the methodology for the fiscal year end reconciliation between the amounts reported to grantors, the amounts recorded in the General Ledger and the amounts reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Going forward the amounts recorded in the General Ledger will tie to the amounts reported in the SEFA and any reconciling items will be noted on the reconciliation between the General Ledger and the amounts reported to the grantors. Completion Date: June 30, 2025

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,051,243 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2023 — management decision was due June 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$9,090,127 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2022 — management decision was due June 15, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$20,954,345 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 2, 2021 — management decision was due June 2, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$15,283,777 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 5, 2021 — management decision was due October 5, 2021.

2020-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Findings and Questioned Costs Relating to Federal Awards Finding: 2020?002 Indirect Cost Criteria: The Borough is required to submit an indirect cost allocation plan to its cognizant agency for indirect costs annually per CFR 2 part 200 appendix V. Condition found: The Borough uses an indirect cost rate to allocate to Federal programs a portion of the government administrative costs that indirectly benefit and support the programs being funded (as permitted). The Borough did not submit an indirect cost allocation plan to its cognizant agency prior to indirect cost being requested for reimbursement. Cause: Due to the turnover in the Administration and Finance Department there was unclear allocation of responsibilities resulting in the indirect cost allocation plan not being submitted timely to the cognizant agency prior to indirect costs being requested for reimbursement. Effect: Indirect costs submitted to the grantors may not be eligible for reimbursement.Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: During our audit procedures, we identified that an indirect cost allocation plan was not submitted to the cognizant agency. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Borough should consider adding controls to ensure an indirect cost allocation plan is prepared timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The Administration and Finance Department has already been in contact with the current cognizant agency and is currently in the process of filing the FY21 Indirect Allocation Plan. The annual filing requirement has been added to the documentation of the annual audit plan and will be addressed in a timely fashion going forward on an annual basis.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Findings and Questioned Costs Relating to Federal Awards Finding: 2020?002 Indirect Cost Criteria: The Borough is required to submit an indirect cost allocation plan to its cognizant agency for indirect costs annually per CFR 2 part 200 appendix V. Condition found: The Borough uses an indirect cost rate to allocate to Federal programs a portion of the government administrative costs that indirectly benefit and support the programs being funded (as permitted). The Borough did not submit an indirect cost allocation plan to its cognizant agency prior to indirect cost being requested for reimbursement. Cause: Due to the turnover in the Administration and Finance Department there was unclear allocation of responsibilities resulting in the indirect cost allocation plan not being submitted timely to the cognizant agency prior to indirect costs being requested for reimbursement. Effect: Indirect costs submitted to the grantors may not be eligible for reimbursement.Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: During our audit procedures, we identified that an indirect cost allocation plan was not submitted to the cognizant agency. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Borough should consider adding controls to ensure an indirect cost allocation plan is prepared timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The Administration and Finance Department has already been in contact with the current cognizant agency and is currently in the process of filing the FY21 Indirect Allocation Plan. The annual filing requirement has been added to the documentation of the annual audit plan and will be addressed in a timely fashion going forward on an annual basis.

Corrective Action Plan

The Administration and Finance Department has already been in contact with the current cognizant agency and is in the process of filing the FY21 Indirect Allocation Plan. The annual filing requirement has been added to the documentation of the annual audit plan and will be addressed in a timely fashion going forward. Completion Date: June 30, 2021

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-06-30

$11,604,894 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,166,230 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2019 — management decision was due July 31, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,772,907 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2018 — management decision was due July 16, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$15,988,562 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.