← Back to home

CHOICE REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORKNon-Profit

EIN: 911704039

UEI: JFN5DFREKVN1

Audited by: DZA PLLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CHOICE REGIONAL HEALTH NETWORK4 audit years4 findings1 repeat
4
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,256,344 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 21, 2026 (52 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

$1,623,590 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2025 — management decision was due October 8, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

GOING CONCERN$903,089 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2024 — management decision was due December 18, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-004, 2022-004QUESTIONED COSTS

Finding 2023-002 Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials; Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Assistance Listing Number: 93.011; 93.912 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00; 4 GA1RH39546-01-07 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023; September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2024 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart E section 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(iii) (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires direct costs be allocated based on the proportional benefit received by each award. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of 25 payroll costs, we noted 17 instances in which the amount allocated to the award was adjusted up or down based on a standard 86.67-hour period instead of the true calculated percentage. The adjustment was not applied equitably to all hours during the period, but only to the program with the largest total hours for the period. This resulted in five instances of overcharge to the award and 12 instances of undercharge to the award. Questioned Costs $265 Cause Due to a systematic error in the payroll system, the adjustments to employee hours were not adjusted equitably to all payroll hours, but instead applied to the program with the largest amount of hours. This resulted in systematic errors in the allocation of payroll compared the true proportional benefit received by each award with an undercharge in some instances and an overcharge in other instances compared to what the actual allocation percentage would have charged. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure proper payroll system design and to review allocated costs for accuracy. Repeat Finding Yes. 2022-04 Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement internal controls over payroll costs charged to awards to ensure they are properly calculated and allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(iii). Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-002 Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials; Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Assistance Listing Number: 93.011; 93.912 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00; 4 GA1RH39546-01-07 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023; September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2024 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart E section 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(iii) (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires direct costs be allocated based on the proportional benefit received by each award. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of 25 payroll costs, we noted 17 instances in which the amount allocated to the award was adjusted up or down based on a standard 86.67-hour period instead of the true calculated percentage. The adjustment was not applied equitably to all hours during the period, but only to the program with the largest total hours for the period. This resulted in five instances of overcharge to the award and 12 instances of undercharge to the award. Questioned Costs $265 Cause Due to a systematic error in the payroll system, the adjustments to employee hours were not adjusted equitably to all payroll hours, but instead applied to the program with the largest amount of hours. This resulted in systematic errors in the allocation of payroll compared the true proportional benefit received by each award with an undercharge in some instances and an overcharge in other instances compared to what the actual allocation percentage would have charged. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure proper payroll system design and to review allocated costs for accuracy. Repeat Finding Yes. 2022-04 Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement internal controls over payroll costs charged to awards to ensure they are properly calculated and allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(iii). Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-002 Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Repeat Finding Yes. 2022-04 Contact Person(s): Beth Mizushima, Chief Operating Officer, mizushimab@crhn.org Explanation and specific reasons for disagreement with the audit finding or that corrective action is not required (if applicable): Not applicable. Corrective action planned: We agree that all awards should be charged the actual allocation percentages of time and effort. It is our assessment that staffing turnover did contribute to challenges with the set-up and deployment of Paylocity in Fall of 2022. We are committed to improving our time and effort system. Currently, we are in the process of migrating accounting and payroll functions to new systems. Additionally, we have dedicated a fiscal staff member’s time to review all payroll expenditures and adjust as needed prior to our next draw. Anticipated completion date: April 30, 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-004, 2022-004

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-09-30

$928,587 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.

2022-002
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to cash management. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires the non-Federal entity to utilize a payment method to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Condition/Context for Evaluation During testing, we noted that there was only one cash draw that occurred during the year. For the cash draw selected, there was no documentation of approval for the cash draw. The Organization drew down from a federal award without incurring sufficient expenditures towards the related award. Advance draws were not approved for under the award. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Cause The Organization?s internal controls did not ensure that the cash draws were appropriately approved, and the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury and disbursement was minimized. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not minimize the time elapsing between the drawdown of the federal funds and disbursement, resulting in cash received in excess of expenses incurred totaling $63,591 as of February 28, 2022. Allowable expenses were incurred in the following months to cover the overdraw. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement the necessary internal controls to ensure payment methods are approved and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury and disbursement. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to cash management. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires the non-Federal entity to utilize a payment method to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Condition/Context for Evaluation During testing, we noted that there was only one cash draw that occurred during the year. For the cash draw selected, there was no documentation of approval for the cash draw. The Organization drew down from a federal award without incurring sufficient expenditures towards the related award. Advance draws were not approved for under the award. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Cause The Organization?s internal controls did not ensure that the cash draws were appropriately approved, and the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury and disbursement was minimized. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not minimize the time elapsing between the drawdown of the federal funds and disbursement, resulting in cash received in excess of expenses incurred totaling $63,591 as of February 28, 2022. Allowable expenses were incurred in the following months to cover the overdraw. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement the necessary internal controls to ensure payment methods are approved and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury and disbursement. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Material weakness in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to cash management. Contact Person(s): Beth Mizushima, Chief Operating Officer, mizushimab@crhn.org; and Connie Sowa, Compliance, Governance and Contracts Officer, sowac@crhn.org. Explanation and specific reasons for disagreement with the audit finding or that corrective action is not required (if applicable): Not applicable. Corrective action planned: We agree that the one cash draw in FY22 was made without incurring sufficient expenditures towards the related award. In FY23 we have committed additional resources and staff to review expenditures from FY22 and FY23 to ensure that all project expenditures were allowable under each grant prior to drawing revenue in FY23. Additionally, in FY23 we have established a Compliance, Governance and Contracts Officer position, which provides increased oversight, approval to support drawdowns for Federal funds and to ensure compliance, adherence to requirements and improving overall internal controls and accounting processes. Anticipated completion date: We have ensured that FY23 draws are determined by the allowable expenditures for each grant. The improved accounting processes and internal controls will occur by September 30, 2023. The accounting process for Draws is included in the Accounting Manual.

About Cash Management →
2022-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to subrecipient monitoring. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires a pass-through entity to adopt compliance policies to ensure sub-recipients comply with requirements under the award, and evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of such agreements for the purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of three subrecipients, no documentation was available showing an assessment of the risk of noncompliance of the subrecipients. For one subrecipient, a fixed fee award was issued that had not received prior approval by the federal funder. As such, when the payment to the subrecipient was made based on a fixed amount, the Organization was not monitoring to ensure the subrecipient was minimizing the time lapse between the receipt of payment and expenditures incurred. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Cause The Organization?s subrecipient monitoring policy did not include all the required provisions outlined in 2 CFR 200.332. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not fully comply with the requirements regarding subrecipient monitoring. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization update the subrecipient monitoring policy to ensure a risk assessment is performed over all subrecipients and that any fixed fee awards receive prior approval from the federal funder. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to subrecipient monitoring. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires a pass-through entity to adopt compliance policies to ensure sub-recipients comply with requirements under the award, and evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of such agreements for the purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of three subrecipients, no documentation was available showing an assessment of the risk of noncompliance of the subrecipients. For one subrecipient, a fixed fee award was issued that had not received prior approval by the federal funder. As such, when the payment to the subrecipient was made based on a fixed amount, the Organization was not monitoring to ensure the subrecipient was minimizing the time lapse between the receipt of payment and expenditures incurred. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Cause The Organization?s subrecipient monitoring policy did not include all the required provisions outlined in 2 CFR 200.332. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not fully comply with the requirements regarding subrecipient monitoring. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization update the subrecipient monitoring policy to ensure a risk assessment is performed over all subrecipients and that any fixed fee awards receive prior approval from the federal funder. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to subrecipient monitoring. Contact Person(s): Beth Mizushima, Chief Operating Officer, mizushimab@crhn.org; and Connie Sowa, Compliance, Governance and Contracts Officer, sowac@crhn.org. Explanation and specific reasons for disagreement with the audit finding or that corrective action is not required (if applicable): Not applicable. Corrective action planned: In FY23 we have established a Compliance, Governance and Contracts Officer staff position (1.0 FTE) that provides compliance support. We have also developed and implemented training around our Ethics and Compliance Manual, which includes 14 new policies and procedures related to ensuring subrecipient compliance standards are met for all grant awards. Since July 1, 2023, we have completed assessments for the risk of noncompliance with all partner agencies before executing contracts. In FY23 we have also amended contracts to be on a reimbursement for allowable expenditures structure rather than fixed amount. We believe that the former leadership team who established the fixed fee award may have misinterpreted the guidance around providing flexibility to reduce burden for financial assistance during COVID response. Furthermore, it is our belief that the former program officer and staff discussed the details of their work and contracts, but we cannot find documentation of receiving prior approval. To address this issue, we have amended contracts in FY23 to include specific contract wording requiring prior approval to implement a fixed fee contract. Additionally, we are in the process of implementing a contract and portal partners management platform. The new contract management system and the improvements in compliance process will ensure that we adhere to the provisions as outlined in 2 CFR200.332. Anticipated completed process September 30, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart E section 2 CFR 200.405 (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires direct costs be allocated based on the proportional benefit received by each award. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of 25 payroll costs, we noted four instances in which the amount allocated to the award was a rounded percentage instead of the true calculated percentage. This resulted in three instances of overcharge to the award and one instance of undercharge to the award. Questioned Costs $76.58. Cause Due to turnover in staff, there was no standard procedure followed for how the payroll costs should be calculated and applied to the federal award. This resulted in an overall overcharge to the award compared to what the actual allocation percentage would have charged. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to review allocated costs for accuracy. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement internal controls over payroll costs charged to awards to ensure they are calculated and allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Program Title: National Organizations of State and Local Officials CFDA Number: 93.011 Award Numbers: 1 G32HS42592-01-00 Award Period: July 31, 2021 - July 31, 2023 Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart E section 2 CFR 200.405 (as codified by the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] in 45 CFR 75) requires direct costs be allocated based on the proportional benefit received by each award. Condition/Context for Evaluation In a population of 25 payroll costs, we noted four instances in which the amount allocated to the award was a rounded percentage instead of the true calculated percentage. This resulted in three instances of overcharge to the award and one instance of undercharge to the award. Questioned Costs $76.58. Cause Due to turnover in staff, there was no standard procedure followed for how the payroll costs should be calculated and applied to the federal award. This resulted in an overall overcharge to the award compared to what the actual allocation percentage would have charged. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to review allocated costs for accuracy. Repeat Finding Not applicable. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement internal controls over payroll costs charged to awards to ensure they are calculated and allocated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.405. Views of Responsible Officials of Auditee Management concurs with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and instances of noncompliance related to allowable costs. Contact Person(s): Beth Mizushima, Chief Operating Officer, mizushimab@crhn.org; and Connie Sowa, Compliance, Governance and Contracts Officer, sowac@crhn.org. Explanation and specific reasons for disagreement with the audit finding or that corrective action is not required (if applicable): Not applicable. Corrective action planned: Paylocity, third party payroll processor, was implemented in October FY23. In FY23 we have reviewed payroll for each month to ensure the charge to the awards are the same as the actual allocation percentage to each grant, and have strengthened the internal controls over the complete, timely and accurate recording of payroll expenses for each payroll. The new internal controls include reconciling the Paylocity system reports to the bank reconciliations and the final journal entries to record the payroll expenses. Anticipated completion date: Completed September 2023.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Washington

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.