← Back to home

Washington Association for Community HealthNon-Profit

EIN: 911323282

UEI: GEPHBMGM92V6

Audited by: Baker Tilly

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Washington Association for Community Health10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-03-31

$1,536,303 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 23, 2026 (133 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-03-31

$1,316,162 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 4, 2024 — management decision was due April 4, 2025.

FY 2023-03-31

$1,272,983 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2024 — management decision was due September 20, 2024.

FY 2022-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,393,449 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2023 — management decision was due June 5, 2024.

2022-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The auditor tested a sample of forty expenditures of which two payroll transactions did not have evidenced of an approved wage rate. Questioned Costs: None Context: Evidence of approval for the basis of a cost reimbursed by the federal award was not maintained. Cause: Internal process and procedures were not followed as required by the Association’s internal control requirements. Effect: Costs reimbursed by the grant were not supported by the proper authorization and approval. Recommendation: The Association should ensure source documentation is maintained for all costs and elements of a cost calculation reimbursed by federal awards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: There is no disagreement with the audit finding from responsible officials that two out of forty wage rate authorization forms requested were not located. Other documentation was submitted that supported the wage rates, including results of a salary survey performed by an HR consulting company. Actions taken in response to finding: In response to the finding, the Association generated detailed pay rate change history reports from the payroll system for these two employees and took a random sample of pay history for three other employees. Nothing unusual was identifiable. The Association will ensure source documentation is maintained for all federal award cost reimbursements by taking the following actions: -At least two Association leadership staff members will review all payroll changes and save documentation in secure, electronic personnel files and payroll processing files. -An improved human resources information and payroll system with more robust time tracking, reporting and document storage features is being implemented. -Detailed requirements for payroll changes will be added to revised finance and human resources policies and procedures (currently under revision).

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-002 Allowable Cost Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Technical and Nonfinancial Assistance to Health Centers Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Award Period: 7/1/2021 – 6/30/2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Subpart E Condition: The auditor tested a sample of forty expenditures of which two payroll transactions did not have evidenced of an approved wage rate. Questioned Costs: None Context: Evidence of approval for the basis of a cost reimbursed by the federal award was not maintained. Cause: Internal process and procedures were not followed as required by the Association’s internal control requirements. Effect: Costs reimbursed by the grant were not supported by the proper authorization and approval. Recommendation: The Association should ensure source documentation is maintained for all costs and elements of a cost calculation reimbursed by federal awards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: There is no disagreement with the audit finding from responsible officials that two out of forty wage rate authorization forms requested were not located. Other documentation was submitted that supported the wage rates, including results of a salary survey performed by an HR consulting company. Actions taken in response to finding: In response to the finding, the Association generated detailed pay rate change history reports from the payroll system for these two employees and took a random sample of pay history for three other employees. Nothing unusual was identifiable. The Association will ensure source documentation is maintained for all federal award cost reimbursements by taking the following actions: -At least two Association leadership staff members will review all payroll changes and save documentation in secure, electronic personnel files and payroll processing files. -An improved human resources information and payroll system with more robust time tracking, reporting and document storage features is being implemented. -Detailed requirements for payroll changes will be added to revised finance and human resources policies and procedures (currently under revision).

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The Association should ensure source documentation is maintained for all costs and elements of a cost calculation reimbursed by federal awards. Explanation or disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding from responsible officials that two out of forty wage rate authorization forms requested were not located. Other documentation was submitted that supported the wage rates, including results of a salary survey performed by an HR consulting company. Actions taken in response to finding: In response to the finding, the Association generated detailed pay rate change history reports from the payroll system for these two employees and took a random sample of pay history for three other employees. Nothing unusual was identifiable. The Association will ensure source documentation is maintained for all federal award cost reimbursements by taking the following actions: • At least two Association leadership staff members will review all payroll changes and save documentation in secure, electronic personnel files and payroll processing files. • An improved human resources information and payroll system with more robust time tracking, reporting and document storage features is being implemented. • Detailed requirements for payroll changes will be added to revised finance and human resources policies and procedures (currently under revision). Name(s) or the contact person(s) responsible for correction action: Laura Dale, Director of Finance Bob Marsalli, CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January, 2024

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$949,117 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 8, 2021 — management decision was due May 8, 2022.

FY 2020-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,261,276 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 6, 2020 — management decision was due April 6, 2021.

FY 2019-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,376,951 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 26, 2019 — management decision was due February 26, 2020.

FY 2018-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,452,322 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2018 — management decision was due March 16, 2019.

FY 2017-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,274,572 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2017 — management decision was due March 18, 2018.

FY 2016-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,169,884 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2016 — management decision was due May 7, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Washington

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.