Washington Gorge Action ProgramsNon-Profit

EIN: 910793062

UEI: G142DZKFX3B8

Audited by: Petersen CPAs and Advisors, PLLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Washington Gorge Action Programs9 audit years1 findings
9
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$3,753,486 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 25, 2026 (157 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,676,075 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2024 — management decision was due May 14, 2025.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Organization maintains a spreadsheet outside of the accounting software to allocate salaries and wages, benefits, and payroll taxes to each federal cost center/grant. Entry into the spreadsheet is done manually and is based on actual time and effort for each pay period by employee. Results of the spreadsheet are used to record payroll allocation journal entries into the accounting system. This spreadsheet was updated at the beginning of 2023. In updating the spreadsheet, there was an error in the way the payroll tax expense was being manually entered. This resulted in certain payroll tax expenses being included in both gross wages expense and taxes and benefit expense. This resulted in federal grant requests for reimbursement being overstated and the excess expense being unallowable. The Organization had insufficient controls over the federal grant compliance process to detect and correct errors in the requests for reimbursement before submission. Context: The Organization failed to follow required federal allowable cost/cost principles across multiple federal programs. Cause: Management did not maintain internal controls sufficient to prevent or detect material noncompliance with federal grant awards. Repeat Finding: No Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with allowable costs/cost principles in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. This finding impacts all of the Organization’s federal awards. Known Questioned Costs: See table below

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-002 – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Material Noncompliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance section 200.430(i) indicates that the standards for documentation of personnel expenses are such that (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must:(i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated;(ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity and (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: The Organization maintains a spreadsheet outside of the accounting software to allocate salaries and wages, benefits, and payroll taxes to each federal cost center/grant. Entry into the spreadsheet is done manually and is based on actual time and effort for each pay period by employee. Results of the spreadsheet are used to record payroll allocation journal entries into the accounting system. This spreadsheet was updated at the beginning of 2023. In updating the spreadsheet, there was an error in the way the payroll tax expense was being manually entered. This resulted in certain payroll tax expenses being included in both gross wages expense and taxes and benefit expense. This resulted in federal grant requests for reimbursement being overstated and the excess expense being unallowable. The Organization had insufficient controls over the federal grant compliance process to detect and correct errors in the requests for reimbursement before submission. Context: The Organization failed to follow required federal allowable cost/cost principles across multiple federal programs. Cause: Management did not maintain internal controls sufficient to prevent or detect material noncompliance with federal grant awards. Repeat Finding: No Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with allowable costs/cost principles in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. This finding impacts all of the Organization’s federal awards. Known Questioned Costs: See table below

Corrective Action Plan

Identify, solve, and prevent future payroll liability and payroll expenses over allocation charged to grantors. Identify and solve errors. Follow financial policy to verify the solution and prevent future noncompliance. Responsible person: Finance Dept. Identify over-allocation amounts for each grant in 2023. Responsible person: Finance Dept. Inform all funders affected. Responsible person: Executive Director. Determine whether policy/procedure need to be updated or established. Responsible Persons: Executive Director and Finance Dept. Monthly check-ins to assess progress on action steps. Reveiw the effectiveness of implemented changes at the end of the fiscal year.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,820,177 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,834,510 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2022 — management decision was due March 12, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,384,996 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 31, 2021 — management decision was due March 3, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,496,735 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2020 — management decision was due March 27, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,202,859 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 4, 2019 — management decision was due March 4, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,115,893 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,156,415 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2017 — management decision was due March 27, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.