EIN: 880139672
UEI: S4LBQLDZ8T48
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 19, 2026 (196 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 6, 2024 — management decision was due March 6, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2023 — management decision was due March 20, 2024.
Costs benefitting other programs (in addition to the 4-in-1 Program) were not properly allocated to those benefitted programs, resulting in excess charges to the 4-in-1 Program. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E ? Cost Principles at 200.405 ? Allocable Costs (c) states, in part, that costs allocable to a particular Federal program may not be charged to other Federal programs ?? to overcome fund deficiencies ? or for other reasons.? However, shifting costs that are allowable under two or more awards is permissible when done in accordance with applicable states, regulations, or award conditions. Cause: The end of the approved budget period (3/31/22) was approaching and the Organization had unspent funds remaining in the 4-in-1 Program. Effect: Costs benefitting other programs (in addition to the 4-in-1 Program) were not properly allocated to those benefitted programs, resulting in excess charges to the 4-in-1 Program. Questioned Costs: $19,323.11 Context: Out of a randomly selected sample of 25 items with a monetary value of $40,814, we noted 8 items where the supporting documentation indicated that Federal award programs, in addition to the 4-in-1 Program were benefitted from the cost incurred; however, the 4-in-1 Program was disproportionately charged for these costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its procedures to assure that costs are properly allocated to the programs receiving the benefit of the cost. In those cases where it is deemed appropriate for the Organization to shift costs from one grant to another (2 CFR 200.405 (c) and (d)), the supporting documentation should support the change.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FINDING #2022-001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Passed through Indian Health Services Urban Indian Health Services ? 4-in-1 Programs ? CFDA #93.193 Condition: Costs benefitting other programs (in addition to the 4-in-1 Program) were not properly allocated to those benefitted programs, resulting in excess charges to the 4-in-1 Program. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E ? Cost Principles at 200.405 ? Allocable Costs (c) states, in part, that costs allocable to a particular Federal program may not be charged to other Federal programs ?? to overcome fund deficiencies ? or for other reasons.? However, shifting costs that are allowable under two or more awards is permissible when done in accordance with applicable states, regulations, or award conditions. Cause: The end of the approved budget period (3/31/22) was approaching and the Organization had unspent funds remaining in the 4-in-1 Program. Effect: Costs benefitting other programs (in addition to the 4-in-1 Program) were not properly allocated to those benefitted programs, resulting in excess charges to the 4-in-1 Program. Questioned Costs: $19,323.11 Context: Out of a randomly selected sample of 25 items with a monetary value of $40,814, we noted 8 items where the supporting documentation indicated that Federal award programs, in addition to the 4-in-1 Program were benefitted from the cost incurred; however, the 4-in-1 Program was disproportionately charged for these costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its procedures to assure that costs are properly allocated to the programs receiving the benefit of the cost. In those cases where it is deemed appropriate for the Organization to shift costs from one grant to another (2 CFR 200.405 (c) and (d)), the supporting documentation should support the change.
Nevada Urban Indians, Inc. (NUI) will implement an allocation disclosure on all backup documentation that is verifiable to program budgets. NUI will also implement a rolling 12-month allocation plan to ensure that all funds received are being spent appropriately and that there will not be a fund deficiency. This 12-month allocation will be reviewed monthly and allocations will be adjusted as needed. In the event that previous allocations need to be changed, NUI will shift costs per 2 CFR 200.405 (c) and (d) and provide additional backup documentation showing the change and why the change was made.
FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2022 — management decision was due March 20, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 5, 2021 — management decision was due April 5, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on July 14, 2020 — management decision was due January 14, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2019 — management decision was due February 18, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2018 — management decision was due December 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on August 9, 2017 — management decision was due February 9, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Nevada →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
