← Back to home

Lander County School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 880133117

UEI: KWRAT4N4JE23

Audited by: HintonBurdick CPAs & Advisors

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Lander County School District7 audit years1 findings
7
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,648,003 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 30, 2026 (71 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,439,081 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2025 — management decision was due July 6, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,059,596 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2024 — management decision was due July 5, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,556,632 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2022 — management decision was due May 14, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,126,546 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2021 — management decision was due May 14, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$986,042 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 8, 2020 — management decision was due May 8, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$865,680 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2019 — management decision was due May 12, 2020.

2019-001
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
OTHER MATTERS

The District?s average cost per special education student in fiscal year 2019 was less than the average cost per special education student in fiscal year 2018 (the combination of State and local funds). Cause: IDEA, Part B funds received by the District were used to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the District from a combination of State and local funds. It appears that the District?s relatively new management was unaware of the unintended consequences of using IDEA, Part B funds to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the District from a combination of State and local funds. Effect: The District did not meet the maintenance of effort compliance requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the District work closely with the State of Nevada, Department of Education, to address the consequences of failure to maintain effort. The District should ensure that its policies and procedures adequately address maintenance of effort requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: IDEA, Part B funds (84.027) received by a local educational agency (LEA) cannot be used, except under certain limited circumstances, to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from local funds, or a combination of State and local funds, below the level of those expenditures for the preceding fiscal year. The LEA must meet the eligibility standard and the compliance standard. To meet the eligibility standard, the LEA must budget for the education of children with disabilities at least the same amount, from at least one of the following sources, as the LEA spent for that purpose from the same source for the most recent fiscal year for which information is available: local funds only; the combination of State and local funds; local fund only on a per capita basis; or the combination of State and local funds on a per capita basis. Expenditures made from funds provided by the Federal Government for which the LEA is required to account through the State may not be considered in determining whether an LEA meets the eligibility standard. To meet the compliance standard, IDEA, Part B funds provided to an LEA must not be used to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from local funds below the level of these expenditures for the preceding fiscal year. An LEA meets this standard if it does not reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the LEA from at least one of the following sources below the level of those expenditures from the same source for the preceding fiscal year: local funds only; the combination of State and local funds; local fund only on a per capita basis; or the combination of State and local funds on a per capita basis. Condition: The District?s average cost per special education student in fiscal year 2019 was less than the average cost per special education student in fiscal year 2018 (the combination of State and local funds). Cause: IDEA, Part B funds received by the District were used to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the District from a combination of State and local funds. It appears that the District?s relatively new management was unaware of the unintended consequences of using IDEA, Part B funds to reduce the level of expenditures for the education of children with disabilities made by the District from a combination of State and local funds. Effect: The District did not meet the maintenance of effort compliance requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the District work closely with the State of Nevada, Department of Education, to address the consequences of failure to maintain effort. The District should ensure that its policies and procedures adequately address maintenance of effort requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

In the past, Special Education expenditures were not monitored actively during the year but were dealt with on an annual basis. Moving forward, this budget will be addressed and monitored quarterly in order to anticipate any potential violations in regard to the Maintenance of Effort requirement. Ms. Ancho, the finance officer, will communicate directly with the superintendent to discuss the trajectory of expenditures during the year so there will be no surprises or failure at the end of the fiscal year. The special education budget will be reviewed with the special education director, the finance officer, and the superintendent on a regular basis to make sure the maintenance of effort is in compliance. The new procedures and practices will be implemented beginning October 1, 2019 and moving forward on a quarterly basis.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Nevada

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.