EIN: 876113995
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: CHILD RICHARDS CPAS & ADVISORS
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 8, 2022 (1451 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Clinton City granted one subaward to Davis Education Foundation; however, the city did not implement controls to monitor activities of the subrecipient. Cause: The city was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Effect: Lack of controls over subrecipient monitoring and failure to performing monitoring activities could result in noncompliance and use of subawards for unauthorized purposes. We have questioned the amount of the subaward where monitoring should have taken place totaling $35,000. Recommendation: We recommend that the city implement controls and procedures to monitor all subrecipient awards and expenditures. Management?s Response: In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: The Compliance Supplement released by the Department of Treasury for the Coronavirus Relief Fund requires that controls be in place to ensure that subrecipient monitoring is in effect for all subrecipients of the award. This includes monitoring subrecipient activities to provide a reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Condition: Clinton City granted one subaward to Davis Education Foundation; however, the city did not implement controls to monitor activities of the subrecipient. Cause: The city was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Effect: Lack of controls over subrecipient monitoring and failure to performing monitoring activities could result in noncompliance and use of subawards for unauthorized purposes. We have questioned the amount of the subaward where monitoring should have taken place totaling $35,000. Recommendation: We recommend that the city implement controls and procedures to monitor all subrecipient awards and expenditures. Management?s Response: In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.
In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.