CLINTON CITYLocal Government

EIN: 876113995

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: CHILD RICHARDS CPAS & ADVISORS

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CLINTON CITY1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-06-30

$1,909,348 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 8, 2022 (1451 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Clinton City granted one subaward to Davis Education Foundation; however, the city did not implement controls to monitor activities of the subrecipient. Cause: The city was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Effect: Lack of controls over subrecipient monitoring and failure to performing monitoring activities could result in noncompliance and use of subawards for unauthorized purposes. We have questioned the amount of the subaward where monitoring should have taken place totaling $35,000. Recommendation: We recommend that the city implement controls and procedures to monitor all subrecipient awards and expenditures. Management?s Response: In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Compliance Supplement released by the Department of Treasury for the Coronavirus Relief Fund requires that controls be in place to ensure that subrecipient monitoring is in effect for all subrecipients of the award. This includes monitoring subrecipient activities to provide a reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administered the subaward in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward. Condition: Clinton City granted one subaward to Davis Education Foundation; however, the city did not implement controls to monitor activities of the subrecipient. Cause: The city was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring requirement. Effect: Lack of controls over subrecipient monitoring and failure to performing monitoring activities could result in noncompliance and use of subawards for unauthorized purposes. We have questioned the amount of the subaward where monitoring should have taken place totaling $35,000. Recommendation: We recommend that the city implement controls and procedures to monitor all subrecipient awards and expenditures. Management?s Response: In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.

Corrective Action Plan

In future awards to any subrecipients, the City will ensure the MOU or Agreement provides for regular feedback reports from the subrecipient as well as a final report outlining the compliance of terms and conditions of the subaward.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.