← Back to home

KANE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 876000499

UEI: NA2KZ8N2TRA5

Audited by: SQUIRE & COMPANY, PC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 14, 2026

KANE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,325,169 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 21, 2026 (86 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,595,647 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2024 — management decision was due May 12, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,727,864 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2023 — management decision was due June 13, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

We reviewed the District’s construction contract that was financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund until after the construction contract was completed. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts and have implemented changes to ensure that the Wage Rate Requirements are adhered to when applicable.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program: Education Stabilization Fund COVID-19 American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (84.425U) Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor of subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215 Appendix A, Contract Provisions; 2 CFR Part 176 Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Context and Condition: We reviewed the District’s construction contract that was financed by the Education Stabilization Fund during the year ended June 30, 2023 and performed testing over internal controls and compliance as related to the Wage Rate Requirements as outlined in the criteria above. Cause: The District did not have processes or controls established to ensure certified payrolls for each week in which contract work was performed were obtained from the contractor or subcontractor for construction contracts financed by the Education Stabilization Fund until after the construction contract was completed. Effect: A potential failure to pay laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors prevailing wage rates as required by the Wage Rate Requirements exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable. Repeat Finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to construction projects subject to the Wage Rate Requirements and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all wage rate requirements are met. Views of responsible officials: Management of the District has reviewed the processes and internal controls related to construction contracts and have implemented changes to ensure that the Wage Rate Requirements are adhered to when applicable.

Corrective Action Plan

(1) Any contracts over $2,000 will include the proper language that the contractor must comply with the Davis-Bacon Act. These contracts will be reviewed by Business Administrator and Superintendent before being signed and (2) Weekly certified reports will be obtained from contractor and reminders have been set up with both parties to ensure this happens timely. Person Responsible: Cary Reese, Business Administrator Timeline: Management of the District will ensure all construction contracts using federal dollars will have the Davis-Bacon language in the contract-October 2023. Certified weekly payroll reports obtained from contractor-October 2023.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,103,113 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2022 — management decision was due June 5, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,766,800 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 4, 2021 — management decision was due May 4, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$984,956 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2020 — management decision was due May 9, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,138,660 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$964,384 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2018 — management decision was due June 16, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$930,854 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 3, 2017 — management decision was due June 3, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$940,608 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2016 — management decision was due June 5, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Utah

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.