← Back to home

Richmond and Henrico Public Health FoundationNon-Profit

EIN: 874003117

UEI: TP5XN6LS9PX5

Audited by: Robinson Farmer Cox Associates

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Richmond and Henrico Public Health Foundation3 audit years2 findings
3
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,493,911 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 12, 2026 (81 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,396,563 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2025 — management decision was due July 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$804,456 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025 — management decision was due July 9, 2025.

2023-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2023-01-Written subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures have not been established, and risk evaluation and monitoring have not been documented Finding type- Material weakness in internal control over subrecipient monitoring. Criteria- Pass-through entities must establish written policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients. Pass-through entities must perform subrecipient risk of noncompliance evaluations for the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring to perform. Pass-through entities must document subrecipients monitoring. Condition- Written subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures have not been established. Subrecipient non-compliance risk evaluations and monitoring were not documented. Effect of Condition- This condition could increase the risk of federal funding being inappropriately spent. . Recommendation- We recommend written policies and procedures be established for subrecipient monitoring. We recommend all subrecipient non-compliance risk evaluation and monitoring be documented in the subrecipient case file. . View of Responsible Officials- RHPHF agrees with the findings and the auditor’s recommendations above.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-01-Written subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures have not been established, and risk evaluation and monitoring have not been documented Finding type- Material weakness in internal control over subrecipient monitoring. Criteria- Pass-through entities must establish written policies and procedures for monitoring subrecipients. Pass-through entities must perform subrecipient risk of noncompliance evaluations for the purpose of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring to perform. Pass-through entities must document subrecipients monitoring. Condition- Written subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures have not been established. Subrecipient non-compliance risk evaluations and monitoring were not documented. Effect of Condition- This condition could increase the risk of federal funding being inappropriately spent. . Recommendation- We recommend written policies and procedures be established for subrecipient monitoring. We recommend all subrecipient non-compliance risk evaluation and monitoring be documented in the subrecipient case file. . View of Responsible Officials- RHPHF agrees with the findings and the auditor’s recommendations above.

Corrective Action Plan

--RHPHF will establish policies for any qualifying federal funds detailing procedures for sub recipient risk evaluation and monitoring.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2023-02-Written suspension and debarment policies and procedures have not been established, and suspension and debarment verifications were not documented Finding type- Material weakness in internal control over suspension and debarment. Criteria- Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Pass-through entities must establish written policies and procedures for suspension and debarment verification of contractors and subrecipients. Condition- Written suspension and debarment policies and procedures have not been established. Suspension and debarment contractor and subrecipient verifications were not documented. Based upon our review of Exclusion Listing on Sam.gov none of the sub-awards to subrecipients were suspended or debarred. Effect of Condition- This condition could increase the risk of federal funding being given to suspended or debarred contractors and subrecipients. . Recommendation- We recommend written policies and procedures be established for suspension and debarment verification. We recommend all suspension and debarred verifications be documented and filed. . View of Responsible Officials- RHPHF agrees with the findings and the auditor’s recommendations above.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-02-Written suspension and debarment policies and procedures have not been established, and suspension and debarment verifications were not documented Finding type- Material weakness in internal control over suspension and debarment. Criteria- Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Pass-through entities must establish written policies and procedures for suspension and debarment verification of contractors and subrecipients. Condition- Written suspension and debarment policies and procedures have not been established. Suspension and debarment contractor and subrecipient verifications were not documented. Based upon our review of Exclusion Listing on Sam.gov none of the sub-awards to subrecipients were suspended or debarred. Effect of Condition- This condition could increase the risk of federal funding being given to suspended or debarred contractors and subrecipients. . Recommendation- We recommend written policies and procedures be established for suspension and debarment verification. We recommend all suspension and debarred verifications be documented and filed. . View of Responsible Officials- RHPHF agrees with the findings and the auditor’s recommendations above.

Corrective Action Plan

RHPHF will establish a policy detailing procedures for verifying sub recipient eligibility for receiving qualifying federal funds and verifying the potential status of suspension or debarment of potential sub recipients. --RHPHF will outline how eligibility, suspension and debarment verifications will be documented. --RHPHF will evaluate if changes or additions to contracts should be made to require sub recipients to disclose or update as to their eligibility status for use of qualifying federal funds.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.