← Back to home

URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALT LAKENon-Profit

EIN: 870392380

UEI: HJ3MK5334WS6

Audited by: SQUIRE & COMPANY, PC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Showing data from August 31, 2026 — the Federal Audit Clearinghouse is under high demand right now, so this couldn't be refreshed. This is the most recent data on record, not necessarily today's.

URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALT LAKE9 audit years16 findings8 repeat
9
Audit Years
16
Total Findings
8
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$1,367,589 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 22, 2026 (111 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-002

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2024-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 41 paychecks from several pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for eight of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2024. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2024-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 41 paychecks from several pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for eight of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2024. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2024-002 Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Auditee Response: Organization believes that prior leadership and lack of supervision allowed paychecks to be approved without the proper flow. FY24 Turnover was roughly 75% in leadership and 60% across the organization. Corrective Action Plan: UICSL moved away to Paycom early 2024 to better help account for Labor Allocation and Grant Codes. With Paycom, employees are automated to each program and there is a designated reporting function allowing us to review what is assigned. UICSL going into 2025 has better defined leadership and Directors for each division so there are clearly defined approvers and supervisors for each purchase and transaction – leadership turnover was high. Person Responsible: Som Chivukula, Finance Director; Matt Poss, Executive Director; Eva Leyer, Human Resources Manager Timeline: UICSL filled all leadership positions by mid-2025 and went through two organizational restructures, creating more mid-level management. This will help ensure compliance with FY25 Audit.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Cash Management, Reporting →
2024-003
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-003

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2024-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared four quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports and three monthly reimbursement requests to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In all cases, we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2024-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared four quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports and three monthly reimbursement requests to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In all cases, we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2024-003 Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Auditee Response: UICSL revised its job costing system to better comply with these requirements and had overlap from previous programs/grants within its old QuickBooks Accounting system. UICSL now has a credit card tracking system by class code, ensures an invoice is allocated, and has focused on reimbursement method invoicing. Corrective Action Plan: Invoices and transactions will not be processed without approval and proper coding. Prior grant personnel and leadership are no longer within the organization. Monthly and quarterly invoices are sent according to each grant / contract agreement will be enforced by the GDCM and DFO in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b). UICL is in active good status with all its current grantors, specifically Indian Health Servies (IHS). Person Responsible: Som Chivukula, Finance Director; Matt Poss, Executive Director Timeline: UICSL removing QuickBooks and switching to Oracle NetSuite in 2025/2026. Scheduling monthly check-ins and expenditure reports reviewed with department leads upon hiring of new Finance Director. All invoices reviewed with grant/project leads and logged appropriately. Staff accountant hired in late 2024 to help provide additional checks but also ensure UICSL focuses on reimbursement (post-expense).

Prior Finding References

2023-003

About Cash Management, Reporting →

FY 2023-12-31

$1,738,011 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2025 — management decision was due February 21, 2026.

2023-002
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-002

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2023-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 29 paychecks from several pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for five of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2023. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2023-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 29 paychecks from several pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for five of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2023. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job‐costing system implemented. Auditee Response: The Organization believes that leadership/personnel turnover, along with outsourced financial management, allowed paychecks to be approved without the proper approval flow. We have ensured documenation is downloaded/kept each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in service provider is made. Corrective Action Plan: UICSL has moved away from its prior payroll processor to better account for these labor allocations and grant classifications. In our FY23 audit, we requested data from our prior processor multiple times. They were unable to provide some of the reports and data which was purged from their system. Our new payroll processor ensures employees' time is allocated to each grant program and there is a designated reporting funcation allowing us to reviews what is assigned. UICSL also has better defined leadership and directors for each division so there are clearly defined approvers and supervisors for each purchase and transaction. Person Responsible: Matt Poss, Executive Director and Eva Leyer, Human Resources Manager Timeline: UICSL transitioned to a new payroll processor at the end of 2023 and Leadership was designated and assigned for 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Cash Management, Reporting →
2023-003
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2023-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared four quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports and three monthly reimbursement requests to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2023-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared four quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports and three monthly reimbursement requests to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job‐costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job‐costing system. Auditee Response: UICSL has limited access to its accounting system and removed access by outsourced financial management personnel. In addition to better invoicing structure, UICSL also revised its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount of attributable ot the programs for reimbursement-based grant funding. Corrective Action Plan: All transactions are logged into the accounting system with appropriate respective grant codes and departments. Invoices and transactions will not be processed without approval and proper coding. UICSL has also implemented a new credit card tracking system along with a purchase order system that is active and maintained by Finance and Accounting. Monthly and quarterly invoices will be prepared for grants in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Person Responsible: Matt Poss, Executive Director and Mary Louise Santacaterina, Grants Manager Timeline: Already removed accounting system access by prior outsourced financial managemnet personnel. Monthly check-ins and expenditure reports have been implemented with department leads in 2024. Grants Manager tasked along with Director of Finance of reviewing monthly invoices and ensuring each meets grant and expenditure requirements. All invoices reviewed with grant/project leads and logged appropriately. Staff acountant hired in 2024 to help provide oversight.

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Cash Management, Reporting →

FY 2022-12-31

$1,314,362 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 17, 2024 — management decision was due December 17, 2024.

2022-002
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 27 paychecks from three pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for six of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. We also selected 16 transactions for purchased goods and services to test compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for two transactions tested lacked documentation of approval by the program director. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2022. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks and purchases identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-002 Allowable Costs Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 27 paychecks from three pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for six of the paychecks tested lacked documentation of approval of the employee’s supervisor. We also selected 16 transactions for purchased goods and services to test compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for two transactions tested lacked documentation of approval by the program director. Cause - The Organization replaced its payroll processing servicer subsequent to 2022. Access to certain records from the prior servicer were no longer available. Personnel turnover resulting in inconsistencies in maintaining required documentation. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program or charged for goods/services not related to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization believes the paychecks and purchases identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation and other purchases charged to a federal program. “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: …(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity” 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization’s processes did not maintain sufficient documentation of the approval of the activity of each employee or the purchase of goods/services. Audit Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee’s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job‐costing system implemented. Auditee Response: The Organization believes the paychecks and purchases identified were approved prior to payment. We will ensure that documentation is downloaded each pay period to ensure such documentation is not lost when a change in servicer is made. Corrective Action Plan: UICSL has implemented a new payroll system Paycom to help account for these Labor Allocation and Grant Codes. Employees are automated to each program and there is a designated reporting function allowing us to review what is assigned. UICSL also now has Directors for each division so there is clearly defined approvers and supervisors for each purchase and transaction. Person Responsible: Matt Poss, Director of Finance Operations Timeline: UICSL transitioned to Paycom in back‐half of 2023 and Leadership was designated and assigned for 2023.

About Cash Management, Reporting →
2022-003
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared two quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2022-003 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Urban Indian Health Services (93.193) Special Diabetes Program for Indians - Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Projects (93.237) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared two quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization’s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization received to address the impact of COVID-19, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job-costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job‐costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization’s job‐costing system. Auditee Response: The Organization is implementing a grant tracking system in addition to its job costing system to better comply with these requirements. Together, these systems will be used to request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement. Corrective Action Plan: (1) Records will be kept in a newly developed spend down report for each grant/contract and reviewed with Division Directors and DFO monthly. All transactions are now being logged in QuickBooks with respective grant codes and departments, will not be processed without. (2) Monthly and quarterly invoicing according to each grant / contract agreement will be enforced by the GDCM and DFO in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b). (3) The Organization has enrolled with the Treasury’s Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) to ensure all future Invoicing and payments can be easily tracked to the program/grant. Person Responsible: Matt Poss, Director of Finance Operations Timeline: All expenses and disbursements being coded to proper Grant/Type in QuickBooks Online – January 2023 Treasury Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) Onboarded – April 18th, 2023 Invoicing Timeline Created per collaboration with GDCM and DFO – May 18th, 2023 Revenue Reconciliation and clearing out of uncollectible or overbooked revenue – June 30th, 2023

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Cash Management, Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

$1,316,268 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2023 — management decision was due November 29, 2023.

2021-001
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

2021-001 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Good Health and Wellness in Indian Country (93.479) Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 (93.665) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared two quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization?s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization was provided to address COVID-19- related issues, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization?s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Cash Management/Reporting Program(s) Name of Federal Program (CFDA Number) Good Health and Wellness in Indian Country (93.479) Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 (93.665) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Context and Condition - We compared two quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports to total disbursements reported by these two programs in the Organization?s job-costing system. In both reports we found that the amounts requested did not match the amounts in the job-costing system. Cause - Due to increased funding the Organization was provided to address COVID-19- related issues, disbursements were not always correctly assigned to a program when incurred. Requests for federal funds were made based on those incomplete reports that were changed subsequently and no longer represent the amounts requested. The original reports were not maintained to support the requests made. Effect - A federal program could disburse funds prior to the disbursement by the Organization. We identified that both programs had requested funds in excess of disbursements. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization?s job-costing system. Views of responsible officials - The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-001 Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the Organization set out at 2 CFR section 200.305(b). Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization 1) maintains timely and accurate recording of disbursements in its job-costing system and 2) regularly request grant funds based on amounts expended as report in the Organization?s job-costing system. Auditee Response: The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and request only the amount attributable to the program for reimbursement. Corrective Action Plan: (1) Records will be kept in a newly developed spend down report for each grant/contract and reviewed with Division Directors and DFO monthly. All transactions are now being logged in QuickBooks with respective grant codes and departments, will not be processed without. (2) Monthly and quarterly invoicing according to each grant / contract agreement will be enforced by the GDCM and DFO in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b). (3) The Organization has enrolled with the Treasury?s Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) to ensure all future invoicing and payments can be easily tracked to the program/grant. Person Responsible: Matt Poss, Director of Finance Operations Timeline: All expenses and disbursements being coded to proper Grant/Type in QuickBooks Online ? January 2023 Treasury Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) Onboarded ? April 18th, 2023 Invoicing Timeline Created per collaboration with GDCM and DFO ? May 18th, 2023 Revenue Reconciliation and clearing out of uncollectible or overbooked revenue ? June 30th, 2023

About Cash Management, Reporting →

FY 2020-12-31

$1,460,166 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2022 — management decision was due July 12, 2022.

2020-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-001OTHER MATTERS

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-001 Allowable Costs Program(s) - Behavioral Health Education and Training Grants (93.243) Urban Health Services (93.193) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation charged to a federal program. ?Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ?(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity? 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization?s processes do not maintain sufficient documentation of the total activity of each employee for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 33 paychecks from three pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for 21 of the paychecks tested lacked documentation sufficient to detail the total activity of the employee. Cause - The Organization implemented a job costing system during 2020 to document the daily activities of employees, but not all programs implemented this system fully. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee?s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2020-001 Allowable Costs Program(s) - Behavioral Health Education and Training Grants (93.243) Urban Health Services (93.193) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the costs principles set out at 2 CFR section 200.430 to substantiate compensation charged to a federal program. ?Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ?(iii) reasonable reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity? 2 CFR section 200.430(i). The Organization?s processes do not maintain sufficient documentation of the total activity of each employee for the programs identified above. Context and Condition - We selected 33 paychecks from three pay periods to test for compliance with standards in these two programs. Records for 21 of the paychecks tested lacked documentation sufficient to detail the total activity of the employee. Cause - The Organization implemented a job costing system during 2020 to document the daily activities of employees, but not all programs implemented this system fully. Effect - A federal program could be charged compensation for employees who did not provide services directly attributable to the program. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Repeat finding - Yes Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the Organization ensure it 1) maintains records of each employee?s activity and 2) monitors compliance with the job-costing system implemented. Views of responsible officials - The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.

Corrective Action Plan

The Organization will review its job-costing system policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-12-31

$1,900,926 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 20, 2020 — management decision was due April 20, 2021.

2019-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002OTHER MATTERS

It was noted in the audit procedures that internal control procedures are not always followed to properly allocate salaries and wages to the contracts as documented in the accounting and personnel records. Cause: Staff and supervisory personnel with insufficient knowledge and failure to follow established procedures to properly monitor the allocation of salaries and wages. Effect: Allocation of salaries and wages that is inconsistent with time allocations documented in accounting and personnel files. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review their controls of the payroll processes. If necessary, update policies and procedures to ensure that changes in time allocation are documented and maintained for future reference.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization determines a time allocation for each employee based upon budget and time spent on various contracts and grants. The Organization then manually allocates payroll expenses based upon these predetermined time allocations. Condition: It was noted in the audit procedures that internal control procedures are not always followed to properly allocate salaries and wages to the contracts as documented in the accounting and personnel records. Cause: Staff and supervisory personnel with insufficient knowledge and failure to follow established procedures to properly monitor the allocation of salaries and wages. Effect: Allocation of salaries and wages that is inconsistent with time allocations documented in accounting and personnel files. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review their controls of the payroll processes. If necessary, update policies and procedures to ensure that changes in time allocation are documented and maintained for future reference.

Corrective Action Plan

Following up on our response to this finding from our audit that occurred in 2019 for the financial year 2018 the Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake hired an HR manager in mid-2019. Part of the duties of the new HR manager is to update and create new personnel files with the changes made by program directors to employee cost allocations and to record cost allocations for newly hired positions. That has reduced inconsistent allocations. However, with this finding UICSL will implement a formally documented quarterly meeting between finance department and HR manager to make sure the allocation of salaries and wages in accounting files are consistent with time allocations documented in the personnel files.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-003OTHER MATTERS

Costs were charged to programs without documentation to support the allowability of costs, or if they were incurred prior to submission for reimbursement. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to federal programs. Effect: Unallowed costs may have been incurred under the federal programs. Context/Sampling: A sample of 45 disbursements among the major programs was made with exceptions noted in three instances, for which costs could not be substantiated as allowable or allocated to programs based on actual use. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance internal controls to ensure adequate supporting documentation is always maintained to support allowability of Federal expenditures and whether expenditures are incurred before being submitted for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requires that cost must be adequately documented to demonstrate that only costs for allowable activity or allowable costs are charged to federal programs. Documentation should also support allocation of center-wide costs among the various programs within the Organization. Condition: Costs were charged to programs without documentation to support the allowability of costs, or if they were incurred prior to submission for reimbursement. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to federal programs. Effect: Unallowed costs may have been incurred under the federal programs. Context/Sampling: A sample of 45 disbursements among the major programs was made with exceptions noted in three instances, for which costs could not be substantiated as allowable or allocated to programs based on actual use. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance internal controls to ensure adequate supporting documentation is always maintained to support allowability of Federal expenditures and whether expenditures are incurred before being submitted for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

In order to address the need for the maintaining documentation to support costs the Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake (UICSL) is migrating from paper requisitions system to an electronic requisition system using customized software from a company called Kissflow that will allow full documentation to attached to any requisition.

Prior Finding References

2018-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Costs were duplicated through the accounting system, with purchase orders being issued but not updated for actual costs or purchases. This resulted in duplicated expenditures being recorded in the accounting system as they relate to credit card charges. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate internal controls to ensure the costs included in cost reimbursement requests were not duplicated. Effect: It is reasonably possible that costs that are not incurred were charged to federal programs. Context/Sampling: In our review of activity on credit card statements it was found that 10 transactions were duplicated and incorrectly part of the reimbursement requests made in the 2019 year. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance internal controls to ensure adequate supporting documentation is always maintained to whether expenditures are incurred before being submitted for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requires that cost must be incurred prior to request for reimbursement. Condition: Costs were duplicated through the accounting system, with purchase orders being issued but not updated for actual costs or purchases. This resulted in duplicated expenditures being recorded in the accounting system as they relate to credit card charges. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate internal controls to ensure the costs included in cost reimbursement requests were not duplicated. Effect: It is reasonably possible that costs that are not incurred were charged to federal programs. Context/Sampling: In our review of activity on credit card statements it was found that 10 transactions were duplicated and incorrectly part of the reimbursement requests made in the 2019 year. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization enhance internal controls to ensure adequate supporting documentation is always maintained to whether expenditures are incurred before being submitted for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

To increase internal controls on the purchase requisition process we have decided to migrate from a paper requisition system to an electronic system that will integrate with our accounting software. This will make sure that there are no duplicates entered and that only transactions that are incurred will be recorded into the accounting system.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-12-31

$1,900,926 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2020 — management decision was due August 9, 2020.

2018-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-003
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-12-31

$1,167,869 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,217,207 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2017 — management decision was due May 30, 2018.

2016-001
Cost Allowability / Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management →
2016-002
Cost Allowability / Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Utah

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.