EIN: 870217280
UEI: JWSYC7RUMJD1
Audited by: Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 7, 2026 (67 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Reference Number 2025‐001 ‐ Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ Institutions participating in Title IV programs (e.g., Pell Grant, Direct Loan) must timely and accurately report student enrollment information to the NSLDS. This is required per the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and applicable federal regulations (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); and Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions must review, update, and certify enrollment status and program-level information using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Roster or the NSLDS Enrollment Maintenance page. Accurate reporting ensures the administration of Title IV aid, impacts student loan servicing, and maintains compliance with federal requirements. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students who had changes in their enrollment status during the academic year, two students were identified to have enrollment changes not reported to NSLDS in accordance with the requirements. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not report changes in student enrollment data accurately to the NSLDS. Underlying Cause ‐ This was caused by a misunderstanding of NSLDS reporting requirements for students enrolled at least half-time in a non-required spring/summer term who later withdrew or dropped to below less-than-half-time status. The University reverted affected students to their most recently certified Winter 2025 enrollment status, rather than retaining the most recent spring/summer status of half-time or greater through the remainder of the term in NSLDS. Recommendation – The University should ensure that reporting of enrollment changes to the NSLDS is performed accurately in accordance with the OMB regulations.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference Number 2025‐001 ‐ Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ Institutions participating in Title IV programs (e.g., Pell Grant, Direct Loan) must timely and accurately report student enrollment information to the NSLDS. This is required per the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and applicable federal regulations (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); and Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions must review, update, and certify enrollment status and program-level information using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Roster or the NSLDS Enrollment Maintenance page. Accurate reporting ensures the administration of Title IV aid, impacts student loan servicing, and maintains compliance with federal requirements. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students who had changes in their enrollment status during the academic year, two students were identified to have enrollment changes not reported to NSLDS in accordance with the requirements. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not report changes in student enrollment data accurately to the NSLDS. Underlying Cause ‐ This was caused by a misunderstanding of NSLDS reporting requirements for students enrolled at least half-time in a non-required spring/summer term who later withdrew or dropped to below less-than-half-time status. The University reverted affected students to their most recently certified Winter 2025 enrollment status, rather than retaining the most recent spring/summer status of half-time or greater through the remainder of the term in NSLDS. Recommendation – The University should ensure that reporting of enrollment changes to the NSLDS is performed accurately in accordance with the OMB regulations.
Audit Finding – Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Various ALNs Reference Number 2025-001 – Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Management agrees with the finding. The University’s Enrollment Services teams are thoroughly reviewing the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) reporting requirements and updating the data extract code (Code). The updated Code will be validated with the NSC’s test submission process. Beginning with Spring Term 2026 (April), a modified version of the current Code that addresses the known issues will be used for reporting. The thorough review and Code rewrite will be completed and tested for use with the first reporting for Fall Semester 2026 (September). The University Registrar’s Office will also implement a process to regularly monitor reporting changes issued by the NSLDS and NSC. Responsible party – Kirsten Jensen, Associate Registrar
FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2025 — management decision was due November 5, 2025.
Reference Number 2024-001 - Procurement Expenditures within Research and Development Cluster Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 for Procurement, small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Further, in accordance with Brigham Young University’s procurement policy, a strategic sourcing specialist must obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures between $10,000 and $250,000. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 12 procurements from a population of 41 total procurements. Of the sample of 12 procurements, 5 sampled procurements did not obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not comply with their procurement policy or the Compliance Supplement – May 2024 (2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI) by obtaining competitive quotes for expenditures. Underlying Cause ‐ University grant officials did not sufficiently review and track procurement expenditures to ensure that the competitive quotes were received and that the University’s policy was being followed. Recommendation – The University should ensure all strategic sourcing specialists receive training on the University’s policy regarding procurement expenditures. Further, the University should perform regular reviews to ensure its existing policies and procedures are being followed. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference Number 2024-001 - Procurement Expenditures within Research and Development Cluster Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 for Procurement, small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Further, in accordance with Brigham Young University’s procurement policy, a strategic sourcing specialist must obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures between $10,000 and $250,000. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 12 procurements from a population of 41 total procurements. Of the sample of 12 procurements, 5 sampled procurements did not obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not comply with their procurement policy or the Compliance Supplement – May 2024 (2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI) by obtaining competitive quotes for expenditures. Underlying Cause ‐ University grant officials did not sufficiently review and track procurement expenditures to ensure that the competitive quotes were received and that the University’s policy was being followed. Recommendation – The University should ensure all strategic sourcing specialists receive training on the University’s policy regarding procurement expenditures. Further, the University should perform regular reviews to ensure its existing policies and procedures are being followed. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.
Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2024 — management decision was due November 23, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2023 — management decision was due November 15, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 8, 2022 — management decision was due November 8, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2021 — management decision was due December 1, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 20, 2020 — management decision was due November 20, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2019 — management decision was due November 23, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2018 — management decision was due November 13, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on May 16, 2017 — management decision was due November 16, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Utah →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.