← Back to home

Brigham Young UniversityHigher Education

EIN: 870217280

UEI: JWSYC7RUMJD1

Audited by: Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Brigham Young University10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$139.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$139,415,016 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 7, 2026 (67 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Reference Number 2025‐001 ‐ Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ Institutions participating in Title IV programs (e.g., Pell Grant, Direct Loan) must timely and accurately report student enrollment information to the NSLDS. This is required per the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and applicable federal regulations (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); and Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions must review, update, and certify enrollment status and program-level information using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Roster or the NSLDS Enrollment Maintenance page. Accurate reporting ensures the administration of Title IV aid, impacts student loan servicing, and maintains compliance with federal requirements. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students who had changes in their enrollment status during the academic year, two students were identified to have enrollment changes not reported to NSLDS in accordance with the requirements. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not report changes in student enrollment data accurately to the NSLDS. Underlying Cause ‐ This was caused by a misunderstanding of NSLDS reporting requirements for students enrolled at least half-time in a non-required spring/summer term who later withdrew or dropped to below less-than-half-time status. The University reverted affected students to their most recently certified Winter 2025 enrollment status, rather than retaining the most recent spring/summer status of half-time or greater through the remainder of the term in NSLDS. Recommendation – The University should ensure that reporting of enrollment changes to the NSLDS is performed accurately in accordance with the OMB regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number 2025‐001 ‐ Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ Institutions participating in Title IV programs (e.g., Pell Grant, Direct Loan) must timely and accurately report student enrollment information to the NSLDS. This is required per the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide and applicable federal regulations (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); and Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions must review, update, and certify enrollment status and program-level information using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Roster or the NSLDS Enrollment Maintenance page. Accurate reporting ensures the administration of Title IV aid, impacts student loan servicing, and maintains compliance with federal requirements. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students who had changes in their enrollment status during the academic year, two students were identified to have enrollment changes not reported to NSLDS in accordance with the requirements. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not report changes in student enrollment data accurately to the NSLDS. Underlying Cause ‐ This was caused by a misunderstanding of NSLDS reporting requirements for students enrolled at least half-time in a non-required spring/summer term who later withdrew or dropped to below less-than-half-time status. The University reverted affected students to their most recently certified Winter 2025 enrollment status, rather than retaining the most recent spring/summer status of half-time or greater through the remainder of the term in NSLDS. Recommendation – The University should ensure that reporting of enrollment changes to the NSLDS is performed accurately in accordance with the OMB regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

Audit Finding – Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Various ALNs Reference Number 2025-001 – Special Test – National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Reporting Management agrees with the finding. The University’s Enrollment Services teams are thoroughly reviewing the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) reporting requirements and updating the data extract code (Code). The updated Code will be validated with the NSC’s test submission process. Beginning with Spring Term 2026 (April), a modified version of the current Code that addresses the known issues will be used for reporting. The thorough review and Code rewrite will be completed and tested for use with the first reporting for Fall Semester 2026 (September). The University Registrar’s Office will also implement a process to regularly monitor reporting changes issued by the NSLDS and NSC. Responsible party – Kirsten Jensen, Associate Registrar

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$133,936,930 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2025 — management decision was due November 5, 2025.

2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Reference Number 2024-001 - Procurement Expenditures within Research and Development Cluster Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 for Procurement, small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Further, in accordance with Brigham Young University’s procurement policy, a strategic sourcing specialist must obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures between $10,000 and $250,000. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 12 procurements from a population of 41 total procurements. Of the sample of 12 procurements, 5 sampled procurements did not obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not comply with their procurement policy or the Compliance Supplement – May 2024 (2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI) by obtaining competitive quotes for expenditures. Underlying Cause ‐ University grant officials did not sufficiently review and track procurement expenditures to ensure that the competitive quotes were received and that the University’s policy was being followed. Recommendation – The University should ensure all strategic sourcing specialists receive training on the University’s policy regarding procurement expenditures. Further, the University should perform regular reviews to ensure its existing policies and procedures are being followed. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number 2024-001 - Procurement Expenditures within Research and Development Cluster Federal Program and Assistance Listing Number (ALN) —Various Criteria ‐ In accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 for Procurement, small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Further, in accordance with Brigham Young University’s procurement policy, a strategic sourcing specialist must obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures between $10,000 and $250,000. Statement of Condition ‐ During our testing, we selected a sample of 12 procurements from a population of 41 total procurements. Of the sample of 12 procurements, 5 sampled procurements did not obtain at least two competitive quotes for expenditures. Questioned Costs ‐ None Effect ‐ The University did not comply with their procurement policy or the Compliance Supplement – May 2024 (2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI) by obtaining competitive quotes for expenditures. Underlying Cause ‐ University grant officials did not sufficiently review and track procurement expenditures to ensure that the competitive quotes were received and that the University’s policy was being followed. Recommendation – The University should ensure all strategic sourcing specialists receive training on the University’s policy regarding procurement expenditures. Further, the University should perform regular reviews to ensure its existing policies and procedures are being followed. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan ‐ Management agrees with the finding and will provide policy training to the individuals and teams involved in the grant procurement process beginning in the second quarter of 2025. New employee training will emphasize these policies. In addition, regular self-reviews will be performed to confirm policy adherence beginning in the third quarter of 2025.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$126,386,518 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2024 — management decision was due November 23, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$119,835,807 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 15, 2023 — management decision was due November 15, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$119,892,449 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 8, 2022 — management decision was due November 8, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$118,166,487 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2021 — management decision was due December 1, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$120,001,742 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 20, 2020 — management decision was due November 20, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$124,433,749 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2019 — management decision was due November 23, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$124,408,754 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2018 — management decision was due November 13, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$124,837,404 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 16, 2017 — management decision was due November 16, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Utah

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.