← Back to home

YCC Family Crisis CenterNon-Profit

EIN: 870213074

UEI: GTNHSY2A6UK6

Audited by: Shaw & Co., P.C. DBA Bountiful Peak Advisors

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

YCC Family Crisis Center10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$995.4K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$995,366 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 25, 2026 (21 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,910,426 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.

2024-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The Organization’s existing procurement policy does not outline the three methods described under CRF 200.320. The policy also does not clearly outline the conditions under which different procurement methods are required based on the dollar amount and nature of transactions. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Effect: This error potentially resulted in the payment of higher prices for goods and services, violating federal procurement regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen its policies, training, and monitoring related to procurement to ensure compliance with CFR 200.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-002 (Material Weakness over Compliance): Insufficient Design of Procurement Policy Criteria: Under CFR 200.320, three types of procurement methods are outlined based on the dollar amount and nature of transactions. Condition: The Organization’s existing procurement policy does not outline the three methods described under CRF 200.320. The policy also does not clearly outline the conditions under which different procurement methods are required based on the dollar amount and nature of transactions. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Effect: This error potentially resulted in the payment of higher prices for goods and services, violating federal procurement regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen its policies, training, and monitoring related to procurement to ensure compliance with CFR 200.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will review and revise its procurement polciies and procedures to provide clarity, provide additional training to employees and board members, and establish monitoring procedures to ensure policies and procedures are being followed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

The Organization failed to follow a formal procurement method when selecting a general contractor for the construction of its transitional housing facility. Construction for the project began during the year ended June 30, 2023 and continued into the year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Effect: This error potentially resulted in the payment of higher prices for goods and services, violating federal procurement regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen its policies, training, and monitoring related to procurement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-003 (Noncompliance): Noncompliance with Procurement Policy Criteria: Under CFR 200.320, formal procurement methods are required when the value of the procurement transaction under a federal award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of the recipient or subrecipient. Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. The Organization’s fiscal policies specify that a minimum of three bids are required for transactions in excess of $5,000.26. Condition: The Organization failed to follow a formal procurement method when selecting a general contractor for the construction of its transitional housing facility. Construction for the project began during the year ended June 30, 2023 and continued into the year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs associated with this finding. Effect: This error potentially resulted in the payment of higher prices for goods and services, violating federal procurement regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should strengthen its policies, training, and monitoring related to procurement.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with the finding and will review and revise its procurement polciies and procedures to provide clarity, provide additional training to employees and board members, and establish monitoring procedures to ensure policies and procedures are being followed.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,231,859 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,383,341 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 16, 2022 — management decision was due April 16, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,557,480 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2021 — management decision was due May 21, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$945,588 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2021 — management decision was due July 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,094,130 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2019 — management decision was due April 24, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$903,675 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2018 — management decision was due May 18, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$877,788 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2017 — management decision was due April 29, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$766,566 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 4, 2016 — management decision was due April 4, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Utah

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.