← Back to home

Higley Unified School District No. 60Local Government

EIN: 866000505

UEI: NC5CF1GYY621

Audited by: Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Higley Unified School District No. 6010 audit years4 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$5.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,882,596 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2026 (73 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,256,390 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2024 — management decision was due June 8, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,308,852 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2024 — management decision was due July 24, 2024.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001OTHER MATTERS

Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Special Education Cluster 84.027A, 84.027X, 84.173A, 84.173X H027A220007, H027X210007, H173A220003, H173X210003 None Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐ 100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐ 052022‐119 and GRARPA‐ ASL‐HIGLEY‐145 Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR §180.215. Condition The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Cause The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for contracts that were in excess of $100,000. Effect The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Special Education Cluster 84.027A, 84.027X, 84.173A, 84.173X H027A220007, H027X210007, H173A220003, H173X210003 None Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐ 100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐ 052022‐119 and GRARPA‐ ASL‐HIGLEY‐145 Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR §180.215. Condition The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. Cause The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for contracts that were in excess of $100,000. Effect The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Special Education Cluster, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 84.027A, 84.027X, 84.173A, 84.173X, 21.027 Contact Person: Tyler Moore, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024 Planned Corrective Action: Higley Unified School District No. 60 has updated the procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred.  Applicable finance staff have been trained on the additional rules and regulations regarding federal funding.  For the vendors that have reached the federal grant threshold of $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220; a binder has been created alphabetically listing their SAM.GOV documentation.  All new vendors added to Visions will have SAM.GOV documentation pulled.  Federal grant account codes will be monitored by the Director and Assistant Director of Finance to track potential account code changes after the initial purchase order has been created. The Purchasing Manager will be alerted to any new expenses being charged to a federal program.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003 Pass‐Through Agency: N/A Questioned Costs: Unknown Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Criteria All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147). Condition It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality. Cause The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through. Effect The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant. Context For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures, and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2023‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003 Pass‐Through Agency: N/A Questioned Costs: Unknown Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Criteria All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147). Condition It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality. Cause The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through. Effect The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant. Context For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures, and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2023‐002 Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W Contact Person: Tyler Moore, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024 Planned Corrective Action: Higley Unified School District No. 60 has done the following:  Applicable finance staff have been trained on the additional rules and regulations regarding federal funding related to labor and Davis Bacon prevailing wages.  Purchasing Manager reviews quote/contract specifically looking for the Davis Bacon requirement.  Vendors that provide labor as part of their procurement will not be moved to a federal fund after the start of the project.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,585,207 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2023 — management decision was due August 21, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: Arizona Governor?s Office Federal Award Number: GFRT-21-1074 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. CONDITION The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. CAUSE The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for contracts that were in excess of $100,000. EFFECT The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. CONTEXT A suspension and debarment check was not performed for two vendors with whom the District expended in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. The sample was not intended to be, and was not a statistically valid sample. RECOMMENDATION The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: Arizona Governor?s Office Federal Award Number: GFRT-21-1074 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment CRITERIA Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. CONDITION The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. CAUSE The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for contracts that were in excess of $100,000. EFFECT The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. CONTEXT A suspension and debarment check was not performed for two vendors with whom the District expended in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. The sample was not intended to be, and was not a statistically valid sample. RECOMMENDATION The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2022-001 Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Contact Person: Tyler Moore, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2023 Planned Corrective Action: Higley Unified School District #60 has updated the procurement policies to align with Federal rules to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. ? Applicable finance staff have been trained on the additional rules and regulations regarding federal funding. ? For the vendors that have reached the Federal grant threshold of $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR ?180.220; a binder has been created alphabetically listing their SAM.GOV documentation. ? In addition, Federal grant account codes are checked bi-monthly for reaching the Federal grant threshold.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,287,643 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2022 — management decision was due August 10, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$5,541,281 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2021 — management decision was due August 16, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$4,288,076 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2020 — management decision was due August 9, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$4,468,020 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2019 — management decision was due September 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,217,935 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2018 — management decision was due August 15, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,316,905 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2017 — management decision was due August 20, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2015-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.