← Back to home

City of Buckeye, ArizonaLocal Government

EIN: 866000236

UEI: QXAMPHKYJKG5

Audited by: Heinfeld, Meech & Co., P.C.

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

City of Buckeye, Arizona10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,286,987 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 29, 2026 (43 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,082,729 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2025 — management decision was due August 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$3,599,992 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2024 — management decision was due July 25, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$14,203,680 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2023 — management decision was due July 22, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$10,213,041 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2021 — management decision was due June 14, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$2,877,359 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2021 — management decision was due July 24, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,056,571 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2020 — management decision was due September 26, 2020.

2019-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Finding Number: 2019-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. Questioned Costs: $10,890 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to ensure expenditures funded with Federal funds are allowable based on the grant agreement and the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, Subpart E, Cost Principles (Uniform Guidance). CONDITION The City charged costs to the Aging Cluster that were unallowable or not properly supported. CAUSE The City did not separately account for the Aging Cluster grant in the general ledger. Additionally, the City did not have a process to support costs charged to the grant for employees with multiple cost objectives. Finally, the costs charged to the grant were not closely reviewed for allowability. EFFECT Unallowable costs were charged to the Aging Cluster, which may require repayment of grant monies. CONTEXT ? The City comingled the Aging Cluster grant with the Arizona Lottery Fund (ALF) grant. ? The City charged a portion of the Recreation Manager?s salary and benefits to the grant in error. ? There are three employees with multiple cost objectives that are charged to the Aging Cluster. The funding split is approved in the detailed budget submitted to Area Agency; however, there is no documentation of how the split was determined and the City is not separately tracking hours for each cost objective.RECOMMENDATION The City should segregate the Aging Custer grant from the ALF grant in the general ledger to ensure monies are appropriately spent on allowable activities and the City can clearly demonstrate which costs were charged to each grant. Additionally, the City should develop policies and procedures to support costs charged to grants for employees with multiple cost objectives. Finally, costs charged to the grant should be monitored and periodically reviewed by management for propriety. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2019-001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. Questioned Costs: $10,890 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles CRITERIA Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to ensure expenditures funded with Federal funds are allowable based on the grant agreement and the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, Subpart E, Cost Principles (Uniform Guidance). CONDITION The City charged costs to the Aging Cluster that were unallowable or not properly supported. CAUSE The City did not separately account for the Aging Cluster grant in the general ledger. Additionally, the City did not have a process to support costs charged to the grant for employees with multiple cost objectives. Finally, the costs charged to the grant were not closely reviewed for allowability. EFFECT Unallowable costs were charged to the Aging Cluster, which may require repayment of grant monies. CONTEXT ? The City comingled the Aging Cluster grant with the Arizona Lottery Fund (ALF) grant. ? The City charged a portion of the Recreation Manager?s salary and benefits to the grant in error. ? There are three employees with multiple cost objectives that are charged to the Aging Cluster. The funding split is approved in the detailed budget submitted to Area Agency; however, there is no documentation of how the split was determined and the City is not separately tracking hours for each cost objective.RECOMMENDATION The City should segregate the Aging Custer grant from the ALF grant in the general ledger to ensure monies are appropriately spent on allowable activities and the City can clearly demonstrate which costs were charged to each grant. Additionally, the City should develop policies and procedures to support costs charged to grants for employees with multiple cost objectives. Finally, costs charged to the grant should be monitored and periodically reviewed by management for propriety. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2019-001 Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Contact Persons: Sherri Meredith/William Kauppi Anticipated Completion Date: Varied Planned Corrective Action: The Finance Department agrees with this finding and has completed the following: ? A separate fund will be established for the ALF grant in the general ledger (immediately). ? The City will develop policies/procedures to support costs charged to grants for employees with multiple cost objectives. (Policy/procedures has not yet been written but employees charged to grants for with multiple cost objectives are now logging their time per pay period to track time between activities.)

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-002
Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Finding Number: 2019-002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Program Income CRITERIA The service provider will use all collected contributions to expand the service for which the contributions were given and to supplement (not supplant) funds received. (42 USC 3030c-2(b)). CONDITION The Aging Cluster program revenue was deposited into the General Fund. CAUSE The City was not aware that program income was recorded in the General Fund. EFFECT The City is not in compliance with federal regulations. CONTEXT The program revenue collected of $23,990 which includes voluntary contributions from seniors for congregate meals, home delivered meals, and transportation are improperly recorded in the General Fund rather than the Area Agency on Aging Grant Fund. Additionally, the program revenue recorded in the General Fund is not used for Aging Cluster activities. This is mitigated to a certain extent by a large General Fund subsidy of $505,300 in the form of a transfer to cover operational shortfalls related to Aging Cluster activities. The transfer covers both actual program revenue collected and the budgeted local match. RECOMMENDATION The City should ensure all voluntary contributions related to the Aging Cluster activities are recorded in the Area Agency on Aging Grant Fund. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2019-002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Number: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Program Income CRITERIA The service provider will use all collected contributions to expand the service for which the contributions were given and to supplement (not supplant) funds received. (42 USC 3030c-2(b)). CONDITION The Aging Cluster program revenue was deposited into the General Fund. CAUSE The City was not aware that program income was recorded in the General Fund. EFFECT The City is not in compliance with federal regulations. CONTEXT The program revenue collected of $23,990 which includes voluntary contributions from seniors for congregate meals, home delivered meals, and transportation are improperly recorded in the General Fund rather than the Area Agency on Aging Grant Fund. Additionally, the program revenue recorded in the General Fund is not used for Aging Cluster activities. This is mitigated to a certain extent by a large General Fund subsidy of $505,300 in the form of a transfer to cover operational shortfalls related to Aging Cluster activities. The transfer covers both actual program revenue collected and the budgeted local match. RECOMMENDATION The City should ensure all voluntary contributions related to the Aging Cluster activities are recorded in the Area Agency on Aging Grant Fund. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2019-002 Program Name/CFDA Title: Aging Cluster CFDA Numbers: 93.044, 93.045, 93.053 Contact Persons: Sherri Meredith/William Kauppi Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately Planned Corrective Action: The Finance Department agrees with this finding and has transferred program revenue collected from the General Fund to the Area Agency on Aging Grant Fund.

About Program Income →

FY 2018-06-30

$1,274,248 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2019 — management decision was due July 6, 2019.

2018-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2017-06-30

$1,254,273 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 25, 2017 — management decision was due June 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$8,432,831 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2016 — management decision was due June 28, 2017.

2016-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.