EIN: 860930528
UEI: Q166LN135TK1
Single Audit filed under EIN: 860135840
That audit also covers 4 related EINs: 860788254, 860807244, 860872987, 860937616 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: Eide Bailly LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 17, 2025 (413 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2024 — management decision was due July 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2023 — management decision was due July 4, 2023.
During testing performed, we identified one out of 17 expenditures that was related to another project. Cause: Due to an oversight by the Project, it paid for an expenditure for another project. Effect: The Project is not in compliance with the guidelines under the terms of the program. Questioned Costs: $51 Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 17 out of 179 expenditures were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: Reimburse the Project for amounts paid for another project. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Noncompliance Criteria: Valley of the Sun School Properties Four (the Project) is required to use project funds for reasonable operating expenditures for the Project. Condition: During testing performed, we identified one out of 17 expenditures that was related to another project. Cause: Due to an oversight by the Project, it paid for an expenditure for another project. Effect: The Project is not in compliance with the guidelines under the terms of the program. Questioned Costs: $51 Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 17 out of 179 expenditures were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: Reimburse the Project for amounts paid for another project. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees.
The project has been reimbursed $51 for the expenditure paid for another property. We have re-trained the staff on the proper protocol and review procedures for the payment of expenditures for each of the properties we manage.
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2022 — management decision was due July 6, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2021 — management decision was due July 10, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 3, 2019 — management decision was due April 3, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2018 — management decision was due March 26, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2017 — management decision was due March 28, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2016 — management decision was due March 25, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
