← Back to home

ARIZONA HOUSING, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 860811431

UEI: QEK2LBHWKXW8

Audited by: Snyder & Brown CPAS

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

ARIZONA HOUSING, INC.8 audit years1 findings
8
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$16.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-12-31

$16,583,661 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2025 (519 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,953,671 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.

2022-101
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

During 2022 the Organization entered into a contract with Maricopa County for $7,730,022 to purchase and renovate a building to be used for low-income housing. Within this contract an amount of $850,000 was indicated as ?Developer?s Fee.? However, this developer?s fee was not defined in the contract. The Organization billed and collected $247,841 of developer?s fees under the contract through December 31, 2022. However, this amount was not supported by underlying actual expenses incurred by the Organization as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause and Effect: Under housing related contracts developer fees typically indicate a revenue source to the developer that is unrestricted. During 2022 the Organization believed that these funds were to be received by the County in addition to the direct costs incurred by the Organization and reimbursed. However, the contract did not define developer fees separately from other reimbursable expenses. As a result, it appears that the drawdown of $247,841 relating to developer fees may be unallowable under the Uniform Guidance. Auditor?s Recommendations: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to federal programs are supported by actual costs incurred, unless other types of costs, such as indirect costs using a specified or de minimis rate, are specified in the contract as allowable.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-101 ? Allowable Cost/Cost Principles (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Federal program information: Funding agencies: U.S. Department of Treasury Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds CFDA numbers: 21.027 Award years: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 Pass-through entities: Maricopa County, Arizona Questioned Costs: $247,841 Criteria: United States Treasury guidelines and the Uniform Guidance require that costs charged to the program are for actual costs incurred and are supported by underlying records. Condition: During 2022 the Organization entered into a contract with Maricopa County for $7,730,022 to purchase and renovate a building to be used for low-income housing. Within this contract an amount of $850,000 was indicated as ?Developer?s Fee.? However, this developer?s fee was not defined in the contract. The Organization billed and collected $247,841 of developer?s fees under the contract through December 31, 2022. However, this amount was not supported by underlying actual expenses incurred by the Organization as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause and Effect: Under housing related contracts developer fees typically indicate a revenue source to the developer that is unrestricted. During 2022 the Organization believed that these funds were to be received by the County in addition to the direct costs incurred by the Organization and reimbursed. However, the contract did not define developer fees separately from other reimbursable expenses. As a result, it appears that the drawdown of $247,841 relating to developer fees may be unallowable under the Uniform Guidance. Auditor?s Recommendations: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that all costs charged to federal programs are supported by actual costs incurred, unless other types of costs, such as indirect costs using a specified or de minimis rate, are specified in the contract as allowable.

Corrective Action Plan

Audit Finding: 2022-101 - Allowable Cost/Cost Principles (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Person Responsible: Ursula Strephans, COO Estimated Completion Date: This Corrective Action is estimated to be complete January 30, 2024 Corrective Action: AHI will work with Maricopa County to amend the contract, ensuring that expenditures are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance when expending federal funds.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,222,517 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2022 — management decision was due December 23, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,043,291 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2021 — management decision was due January 13, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,043,291 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2021 — management decision was due January 13, 2022.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,227,648 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2019 — management decision was due September 21, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,227,648 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2018 — management decision was due July 28, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,226,624 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2017 — management decision was due September 30, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.