← Back to home

Arizona Retirement Home of Scottsdale II, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 860711505

UEI: CUWLLAUHPZ54

Audited by: Eide Bailly, LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Arizona Retirement Home of Scottsdale II, Inc.10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$2,450,998 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,448,396 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2025 — management decision was due October 19, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,436,825 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2024 — management decision was due October 8, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,375,335 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2023 — management decision was due October 6, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,378,279 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2022 — management decision was due October 6, 2022.

2021-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

One out of six tenant files tested lacked the required support to show that EIV reports were completed during the tenant?s recertification process. Although the tenant?s income was verified as part of the recertification process, the EIV reports were not retained in the tenant file. Cause: Due to an oversight by the Project, EIV reports were not retained in the tenant?s file after the recertification was completed. Effect: The Project is out of compliance with HUD requirements as the required EIV reports were not retained in the tenant?s file after the income verification process was completed during the recertification process. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of six out of 56 tenants were selected for eligibility testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: As part of the recertification process, after the Project verifies tenants? income using the EIV system, the EIV reports should be retained within the tenants? files. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Project is required to complete and retain Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) reports during the recertification process to verify tenants? income. Condition: One out of six tenant files tested lacked the required support to show that EIV reports were completed during the tenant?s recertification process. Although the tenant?s income was verified as part of the recertification process, the EIV reports were not retained in the tenant file. Cause: Due to an oversight by the Project, EIV reports were not retained in the tenant?s file after the recertification was completed. Effect: The Project is out of compliance with HUD requirements as the required EIV reports were not retained in the tenant?s file after the income verification process was completed during the recertification process. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of six out of 56 tenants were selected for eligibility testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: As part of the recertification process, after the Project verifies tenants? income using the EIV system, the EIV reports should be retained within the tenants? files. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Summary: One out of six tenant files tested lacked support to show that EIV reports were completed during the tenant's recertification process. Although the tenant's income was verified as part of the recertification process, the EIV reports were not retained in the tenant file. Responsible Individuals: Nancy B. Bills, Vice President of Biltmore Properties, Inc. Corrective Action Plan: The tenant's income was verified through the EIV system. The on-site manager failed to locate the EIV folder and reports for this resident who was in process of eviction. We understand the importance of maintaining these files that document the use of the EIV system. We have re-trained the staff on the proper protocol for EIV and maintaining and securing these files for each tenant. Anticipated Completion Date: We will also provide additional EIV training for all staff prior to the end of 2022.

About Eligibility →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,383,122 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 27, 2021 — management decision was due October 27, 2021.

2020-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During the year under audit, the Project underwent a physical inspection of the property. Based on findings identified in the inspection report, the Project received a score that is below 60 resulting in noncompliance with contractual obligations with HUD. Cause: During the inspection there were health and safety matters that were identified as part of the inspection resulting in the score. Effect: The Project is out of compliance and tenants of the Project may not be receiving the quality of housing to which they are entitled. Recommendation: As part of the inspection process, the Project should ensure that all health and safety matters are appropriately addressed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: As part of the regulatory agreement with HUD, the Project is subject to physical inspections to be performed on the property in order to determine that appropriate maintenance is being performed to create a safe living environment for tenants. Condition: During the year under audit, the Project underwent a physical inspection of the property. Based on findings identified in the inspection report, the Project received a score that is below 60 resulting in noncompliance with contractual obligations with HUD. Cause: During the inspection there were health and safety matters that were identified as part of the inspection resulting in the score. Effect: The Project is out of compliance and tenants of the Project may not be receiving the quality of housing to which they are entitled. Recommendation: As part of the inspection process, the Project should ensure that all health and safety matters are appropriately addressed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Name: Supportive Housing for the Elderly-Section 202 Capital Advance and Project Rental Assistance Contract CFDA#: 14.157 Finding Summary: During the year under audit, the Project underwent a physical inspection of the property. Based on findings identified in the inspection report, the Project received a score that is below 60 resulting in noncompliance with contractual obligations with HUD. Responsible Individuals: Nancy B. Bills, Vice President of Biltmore Properties, Inc. Corrective Action Plan: During the inspection there were health and safety matters that were identified as part of the inspection resulting in the score. We have corrected all findings identified on the physical inspection and reported it to HUD late in 2020. We had recently completed the HVAC system installation prior to the inspection. This installation had been an on-going project over the past several years. We hired outside vendors to complete the open health and safety issues that existed on the property as of the date of the inspection. We have requested a re-inspection from REAC but due to COVID protocols?a new inspection has not been scheduled as of the report date. Anticipated Completion Date: It is anticipated that this finding will be resolved as the end of 2021, as a new inspection must be scheduled by REAC?which we continue to request on behalf of the property.

About Other →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,380,958 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 4, 2020 — management decision was due November 4, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,400,181 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,400,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,404,837 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2017 — management decision was due October 6, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.