← Back to home

WIYN CONSORTIUM INCNon-Profit

EIN: 860669456

UEI: ZGRZLK6QYKR6

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 47 [National Science Foundation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

WIYN CONSORTIUM INC10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,569,412 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 19, 2026 (76 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,012,898 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2025 — management decision was due December 11, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

$2,349,068 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2024 — management decision was due January 1, 2025.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance (UG), General Procurement Standards require a non-Federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. WIYN’s policy for cost and price analysis of procurements under $150,000 is as follows: In the case where there is adequate competition (at least two quotes, and ideally three or more quotes, for procurements under $150,000), documentation of the different proposed prices received and the basis for vendor selection shall be deemed to be an adequate price analysis. Condition/Context: For 1 of the 5 procurement files selected, WIYN did not have the complete procurement file documentation available for review. Documentation was provided of the process and results related to the vendor selected, however, evidence of the cost and price analysis required under WIYN’s policy for a procurement under $150,000 was not provided. It seemed likely that these steps were performed but not documented. Questioned costs: $50,615 Cause: WIYN worked with an insurance broker during the selection and renewal process and documentation shows the timing and elements of the process as well as the results but did not include documentation of the cost and price analysis required under WIYN’s policy. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review the process in place to identify any gaps and inconsistencies with procurement files in comparison to WIYN’s policies and UG requirements and ensure relevant controls are properly designed and operating effectively. In addition, management should ensure all active procurement files are in compliance with WIYN’s policies. Views of responsible officials: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance (UG), General Procurement Standards require a non-Federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. WIYN’s policy for cost and price analysis of procurements under $150,000 is as follows: In the case where there is adequate competition (at least two quotes, and ideally three or more quotes, for procurements under $150,000), documentation of the different proposed prices received and the basis for vendor selection shall be deemed to be an adequate price analysis. Condition/Context: For 1 of the 5 procurement files selected, WIYN did not have the complete procurement file documentation available for review. Documentation was provided of the process and results related to the vendor selected, however, evidence of the cost and price analysis required under WIYN’s policy for a procurement under $150,000 was not provided. It seemed likely that these steps were performed but not documented. Questioned costs: $50,615 Cause: WIYN worked with an insurance broker during the selection and renewal process and documentation shows the timing and elements of the process as well as the results but did not include documentation of the cost and price analysis required under WIYN’s policy. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review the process in place to identify any gaps and inconsistencies with procurement files in comparison to WIYN’s policies and UG requirements and ensure relevant controls are properly designed and operating effectively. In addition, management should ensure all active procurement files are in compliance with WIYN’s policies. Views of responsible officials: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Mathematical and Physical Sciences – Assistance Listing No. 49.049 Recommendation: We recommend management review the process in place to identify any gaps and inconsistencies with procurement files in comparison to WIYN’s policies and UG requirements and ensure relevant controls are properly designed and operating effectively. In addition, management should ensure all active procurement files are in compliance with WIYN’s policies. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: WIYN utilizes Marsh as an insurance brokerage service to evaluate, recommend best value, and negotiate policies with the insurance carriers. WIYN stated a preference to renew with Hartford during renewal strategy sessions with Marsh because of the requirements for continuity of service, quality of service, and the understanding of WIYN’s operations. The price/quote was assessed against market trends, but evidence of this comparison was not maintained by Marsh or WIYN. In response to the finding, WIYN will require Marsh to provide evidence that policies are marketed to multiple carriers at least once every 3-years, including an explanation of market conditions when carrier availability is limited. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: John Salzer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/01/2024

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-09-30

$2,245,564 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2023 — management decision was due December 26, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,175,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2022 — management decision was due February 18, 2023.

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,012,797 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2021 — management decision was due February 24, 2022.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,852,500 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2020 — management decision was due February 27, 2021.

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,264,632 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2019 — management decision was due December 23, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

$1,151,199 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 28, 2018 — management decision was due November 28, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$1,248,623 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2017 — management decision was due November 25, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.