← Back to home

HOPE Toledo ServicesNon-Profit

EIN: 852049351

UEI: HQZ4GK291SL3

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

HOPE Toledo Services2 audit years7 findings3 repeat
2
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-12-31

GOING CONCERN$2,019,512 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 16, 2027 (138 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001

During our testing, it was noted that the Organization did not implement policies and procedures over procurement, suspension, and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance in the year under audit. Questioned Costs: None Context: In sample of 7 for suspension and debarment, internal controls over reviewing vendors for suspension and debarment in accordance with the Organization's written policy were not performed. In a sample of 3 for procurement, due diligence was noted, however, the Organization's written policy is not in compliance with the requirements as the policy did not include micro purchase thresholds or competitive bid processes. Cause: The Organization was new to federal funding and procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures were not yet in place. Effect: Audit procedures performed over suspension and debarment verified that the Organization did not engage with entities that were suspended or debarred and verified due diligence was performed for procurement, however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediate prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put in place a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance and will consult with external auditors.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP1610 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the Organization did not implement policies and procedures over procurement, suspension, and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance in the year under audit. Questioned Costs: None Context: In sample of 7 for suspension and debarment, internal controls over reviewing vendors for suspension and debarment in accordance with the Organization's written policy were not performed. In a sample of 3 for procurement, due diligence was noted, however, the Organization's written policy is not in compliance with the requirements as the policy did not include micro purchase thresholds or competitive bid processes. Cause: The Organization was new to federal funding and procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures were not yet in place. Effect: Audit procedures performed over suspension and debarment verified that the Organization did not engage with entities that were suspended or debarred and verified due diligence was performed for procurement, however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediate prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put in place a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance and will consult with external auditors.

Corrective Action Plan

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Organization will put in place a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance and will consult with external auditors. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/2026

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-002

The Organization did not have controls in place to prevent, detect, or correct errors in reporting. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that there was no formal review of the quarterly report prepared before it was submitted to the grantor. Cause: The Organization was in the startup phase and maintaining current operations with limited staff. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of reporting; however, the lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the report and before submission to the grantor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP1610 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Organization is required to submit quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports to the Federal Agency. Condition: The Organization did not have controls in place to prevent, detect, or correct errors in reporting. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that there was no formal review of the quarterly report prepared before it was submitted to the grantor. Cause: The Organization was in the startup phase and maintaining current operations with limited staff. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of reporting; however, the lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the report and before submission to the grantor.

Corrective Action Plan

Reporting Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the report and before submission to the grantor. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/2026

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Reporting →
2023-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Internal controls and procedures were not consistently followed in relation to allowable costs as the amount included in the reporting for grant expenditures differed from the amount recorded in the general ledger as being paid. Questioned costs: $1,007 Context: In a sample of 50: 1. 1 of the provider payments allocated to the grant was based on an estimated dollar amount that exceeded the amount actually paid to the provider. The decrease in the amount paid occurred as the provider started with them mid-month and the number of students in the classroom was lower than estimated. 2. A December 2023 invoice allocated to the grant was not recorded as accounts payable and an expense in the general ledger. An audit entry of $7,500 was made as a result. Cause: The Organization was in its startup phases and was maintaining current operations with limited staff. The amount paid was not compared to the amount calculated for payment to determine if they matched or if an adjustment was needed to the expenditure report before submission to the grantor. Effect or potential effect: The amounts reimbursed by the Federal Agency may be unallowable and result in a refund to the Federal Agency. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure the expenses allocated to the grant are based on expenses coded in the general ledger. We also recommend that the expenditure reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the expenditure report and before submission to the awarding agency and make sure the approved support is kept on file supporting expenses are based on actual payments made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP1610 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of allowable costs. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: Internal controls and procedures were not consistently followed in relation to allowable costs as the amount included in the reporting for grant expenditures differed from the amount recorded in the general ledger as being paid. Questioned costs: $1,007 Context: In a sample of 50: 1. 1 of the provider payments allocated to the grant was based on an estimated dollar amount that exceeded the amount actually paid to the provider. The decrease in the amount paid occurred as the provider started with them mid-month and the number of students in the classroom was lower than estimated. 2. A December 2023 invoice allocated to the grant was not recorded as accounts payable and an expense in the general ledger. An audit entry of $7,500 was made as a result. Cause: The Organization was in its startup phases and was maintaining current operations with limited staff. The amount paid was not compared to the amount calculated for payment to determine if they matched or if an adjustment was needed to the expenditure report before submission to the grantor. Effect or potential effect: The amounts reimbursed by the Federal Agency may be unallowable and result in a refund to the Federal Agency. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure the expenses allocated to the grant are based on expenses coded in the general ledger. We also recommend that the expenditure reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the expenditure report and before submission to the awarding agency and make sure the approved support is kept on file supporting expenses are based on actual payments made.

Corrective Action Plan

Allowable Costs Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure the expenses allocated to the grant are based on expenses coded in the general ledger. We also recommend that the expenditure reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the expenditure report and before submission to the awarding agency and make sure the approved support is kept on file supporting expenses are based on actual payments made. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/2026

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-005
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003

Internal controls over compliance of allowable costs were not in place to support that the organization had implemented controls to prevent, detect, or correct errors in calculating provider payments or payroll that were allocated to the federal program. Questioned costs: None Context: Provider Payments Providers payments calculations are not reviewed for errors by a separate individual. In a sample of 32, the amount used in the calculation for 20 providers was based on an agreement that was not signed by both the provider and the Organization’s CEO or it was based on an agreement signed by both parties during 2024 or 2025. A copy of the signed provider agreement was not consistently retained by the Organization to support the amount both parties agreed to. In a sample of 32, 12 attendance sheets did not support the attendance number used in the provider payment calculation. The attendance number used was based on an estimate of students as the provider did not turn in the attendance sheet timely, but the Organization wanted to ensure the provider was paid timely. Had actual attendance numbers been used rather than estimated, the amount due to the provider would have decreased by $9,225. In a sample of 32, the amount used in the calculation for 4 providers was based on an executed agreement that indicated the maximum amount to be used in the calculation for payment was lower. Rates used in the calculation change periodically based on various factors, however, the agreement was not reviewed to ensure the updated amount didn’t exceed the maximum indicated. Payroll In a sample of 10, there was no record of timesheet approval by a supervisor or of the overall approval of the associated payroll register. Other General Disbursements In a sample of 50, there was no check signature indicating approval of disbursement on 1 payment. The check was issued without being signed by a member of the Organization. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received and the audit for 2022 was completed during 2024. Formal policies and procedures over record retention were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started and recommendations from the prior year audit were not received during 2023. Effect or potential effect: The amounts paid to providers and employees could be improperly calculated resulting in an error in the funds covered under the federal grant. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend that the management and finance staff work on retaining documentation and training staff to ensure processes and controls are in place over provider payment calculations and payroll. We also recommend a formal check signing process is implemented to ensure authorization of disbursement is documented appropriately. Management response: We agreed with the above comment and will update our policies and procedures to incorporate the recommendations above.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP1610 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance with respect to record retention Specific requirement-criteria: The Organization is required to provide support that internal controls over compliance are in place. Condition: Internal controls over compliance of allowable costs were not in place to support that the organization had implemented controls to prevent, detect, or correct errors in calculating provider payments or payroll that were allocated to the federal program. Questioned costs: None Context: Provider Payments Providers payments calculations are not reviewed for errors by a separate individual. In a sample of 32, the amount used in the calculation for 20 providers was based on an agreement that was not signed by both the provider and the Organization’s CEO or it was based on an agreement signed by both parties during 2024 or 2025. A copy of the signed provider agreement was not consistently retained by the Organization to support the amount both parties agreed to. In a sample of 32, 12 attendance sheets did not support the attendance number used in the provider payment calculation. The attendance number used was based on an estimate of students as the provider did not turn in the attendance sheet timely, but the Organization wanted to ensure the provider was paid timely. Had actual attendance numbers been used rather than estimated, the amount due to the provider would have decreased by $9,225. In a sample of 32, the amount used in the calculation for 4 providers was based on an executed agreement that indicated the maximum amount to be used in the calculation for payment was lower. Rates used in the calculation change periodically based on various factors, however, the agreement was not reviewed to ensure the updated amount didn’t exceed the maximum indicated. Payroll In a sample of 10, there was no record of timesheet approval by a supervisor or of the overall approval of the associated payroll register. Other General Disbursements In a sample of 50, there was no check signature indicating approval of disbursement on 1 payment. The check was issued without being signed by a member of the Organization. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received and the audit for 2022 was completed during 2024. Formal policies and procedures over record retention were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started and recommendations from the prior year audit were not received during 2023. Effect or potential effect: The amounts paid to providers and employees could be improperly calculated resulting in an error in the funds covered under the federal grant. Repeat finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend that the management and finance staff work on retaining documentation and training staff to ensure processes and controls are in place over provider payment calculations and payroll. We also recommend a formal check signing process is implemented to ensure authorization of disbursement is documented appropriately. Management response: We agreed with the above comment and will update our policies and procedures to incorporate the recommendations above.

Corrective Action Plan

Other Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that the management and finance staff work on retaining documentation and training staff to ensure processes and controls are in place over provider payment calculations and payroll. We also recommend a formal check signing process is implemented to ensure authorization of disbursement is documented appropriately. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: We will update our policies and procedures to incorporate the recommendations above. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 9/30/2026

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Other →

FY 2022-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$874,148 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2024 — management decision was due April 17, 2025.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing, it was noted that the Organization did not implement policies and procedures over procurement, suspension, and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance in the year under audit. Questioned Costs: None Context: In a sample of 8, 7 did not follow 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received. Procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance going forward.Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put in place a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance and will consult with external auditors.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the Organization did not implement policies and procedures over procurement, suspension, and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance in the year under audit. Questioned Costs: None Context: In a sample of 8, 7 did not follow 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received. Procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance going forward.Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put in place a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance and will consult with external auditors.

Corrective Action Plan

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance going forward. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The Organization will implement a policy and procedure over procurement and suspension and debarment under Uniform Grant Guidance. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2024

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The Organization did not have controls in place to prevent, detect, or correct errors in reporting. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that there was no formal layer of review over the quarterly report prepared before it was submitted to the grantor. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and maintaining current operations with limited staff. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of reporting; however, the lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the report and before submission to the grantor.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Organization is required to submit quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports to the Federal Agency. Condition: The Organization did not have controls in place to prevent, detect, or correct errors in reporting. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that there was no formal layer of review over the quarterly report prepared before it was submitted to the grantor. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and maintaining current operations with limited staff. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of reporting; however, the lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Views of responsible officials: We agreed with the above comment. The Organization will put a formal layer of review after preparation of the report and before submission to the grantor.

Corrective Action Plan

Reporting Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that reports are prepared and reviewed by separate individuals. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The Organization will add a layer of review for the prepared reports prior to submission to the grantor. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2024

About Reporting →
2022-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Internal controls over compliance of allowable costs were not in place to support that the organization had implemented controls to prevent, detect, or correct errors in calculating provider payments or payroll that were allocated to the federal program. Questioned costs: None Context: Provider Payments Providers payments calculations are not reviewed for errors by a separate individual. In a sample of 20, the amount used in the calculation for 7 providers was higher than the maximum award amount per the provider agreement. A copy of the signed provider agreement was not consistently retained by the Organization. In a sample of 20, 1 attendance sheet did not support the attendance number used in the provider payment calculation. The lack of controls over the calculation resulted in an overpayment to the provider of less than $1,000. Payroll In a sample of 2, there was no record of timesheet approval by a supervisor or of the overall approval of the associated payroll register. There was no record of the approved pay rate for 1 of the 2 items selected. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received. Formal policies and procedures over record retention were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started. Effect or potential effect: The amounts paid to providers, employees, or vendors could be improperly calculated resulting in an error in the funds covered under the federal grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to recruit for staff to fill the needed positions in the finance department as they continue to grow. Management response: We agreed with the above comment and are actively recruiting for positions in the finance department.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance with respect to record retention Specific requirement-criteria: The Organization is required to provide support that internal controls over compliance are in place. Condition: Internal controls over compliance of allowable costs were not in place to support that the organization had implemented controls to prevent, detect, or correct errors in calculating provider payments or payroll that were allocated to the federal program. Questioned costs: None Context: Provider Payments Providers payments calculations are not reviewed for errors by a separate individual. In a sample of 20, the amount used in the calculation for 7 providers was higher than the maximum award amount per the provider agreement. A copy of the signed provider agreement was not consistently retained by the Organization. In a sample of 20, 1 attendance sheet did not support the attendance number used in the provider payment calculation. The lack of controls over the calculation resulted in an overpayment to the provider of less than $1,000. Payroll In a sample of 2, there was no record of timesheet approval by a supervisor or of the overall approval of the associated payroll register. There was no record of the approved pay rate for 1 of the 2 items selected. Cause: The Organization is in the startup phases and the Uniform Grant Requirements are new as 2022 was the first year federal funding was received. Formal policies and procedures over record retention were not yet in place when getting the Organization's operations started. Effect or potential effect: The amounts paid to providers, employees, or vendors could be improperly calculated resulting in an error in the funds covered under the federal grant. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to recruit for staff to fill the needed positions in the finance department as they continue to grow. Management response: We agreed with the above comment and are actively recruiting for positions in the finance department.

Corrective Action Plan

Other- Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance with respect to record retention Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to recruit for staff to fill the needed positions in the finance department as they continue to grow. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The Organization is actively seeking to hire additional staffing for the finance department. It has currently been operated on a parttime basis and our growth has exceeded that capacity. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: John C. Jones, President and CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024 If the U.S. Department of Treasury has questions regarding this plan, please call John C. Jones at 419- 720-4281.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Ohio

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.