EIN: 850535332
UEI: SSN2YM3D71P5
Audited by: Snyder & Brown CPAS
Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (155 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2024 — management decision was due July 8, 2024.
The Foundation did not retain documentation to support performance a price analysis nor provide the opportunity for open competition. Additionally, the Foundation did not review for suspension or debarment and required contract provisions were not followed. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of procurement. Effect: Improper expenses may be paid and charged to the federal program and covered transactions could be potentially entered into with suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were unable to be determined. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 12 transactions out of 60 total transactions were selected for testing totaling $148,605 of $275,567 procurement expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation follow designed control processes which includes performing required procurement procedures and maintaining within the procurement file documentation of a review to ensure the party to the covered transaction is not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Foundation is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the federal award. The non‐Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327 which also requires documentation to be retained to detail the history of procurements. In addition, as outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The Foundation did not retain documentation to support performance a price analysis nor provide the opportunity for open competition. Additionally, the Foundation did not review for suspension or debarment and required contract provisions were not followed. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of procurement. Effect: Improper expenses may be paid and charged to the federal program and covered transactions could be potentially entered into with suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were unable to be determined. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 12 transactions out of 60 total transactions were selected for testing totaling $148,605 of $275,567 procurement expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation follow designed control processes which includes performing required procurement procedures and maintaining within the procurement file documentation of a review to ensure the party to the covered transaction is not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding Summary: The Foundation did not retain documentation to support performance of a price analysis nor provide the opportunity for open competition. Additionally, the Foundation did not review for suspension or debarment and required contract provisions were not followed. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Televerde Foundation has experienced significant growth from inception in March 2020 to fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. We have grown from contributions and grants of $83 thousand and $50 thousand, respectively, in March 2020 to contributions and grants of $236 thousand and $978 thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2022. During this same period, Televerde Foundation went from 3 employees to 21 employees and experienced significant turnover in finance staff including 2 CFO’s, 2 Controllers, and four staff accountants. The growth combined with lack of a consistent finance team is the primary cause of this deficiency. To address the deficiency, management will perform the actions below. Management will retain and catalog documentation related to price quotes for certain Foundation expenditures. We will update our procurement policy to be consistent with federal guidelines to assist in streamlining the procurement process. We have hired a Grant Administrator and Analyst who is responsible for reviewing contractors against the System for Award Management for suspension or debarment, including subrecipients. Responsible Individuals: Michelle Cirocco, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: January 2024
51 out of 60 expenditures tested lacked proper documentation of review and approval. 51 out of 60 expenditures tested were based on budgeted amounts expended and not actual amounts with no true up performed. 1 out of 60 expenditures tested were deemed unallowable based on the terms of the grant agreement. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of expenditures charged to the program for allowable activities and allowable costs. The Organization did not have controls in place to properly allocate, record and track actual costs incurred to the grant. Effect: Not having a system to track actual grant expenditures incurred properly to grants increases risk that improper expenses may be paid and charged to the federal program or charged at the wrong amount. Questioned Costs: Total known questioned costs are $53,986. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions were selected for testing, which accounted for $297,033 of $640,075 reported program expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management implement a process that allows for actual expenditures to tracked, allocated, and be billed to the specific program and ensure that supporting documentation of review is retained to demonstrate compliance with the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Foundation is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions. A complete system of internal controls requires all expenditures be properly approved and supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, all expenditures charged to the federal program are required to be allowable costs under the program and based on actual, and not budgeted amounts. Condition: 51 out of 60 expenditures tested lacked proper documentation of review and approval. 51 out of 60 expenditures tested were based on budgeted amounts expended and not actual amounts with no true up performed. 1 out of 60 expenditures tested were deemed unallowable based on the terms of the grant agreement. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of expenditures charged to the program for allowable activities and allowable costs. The Organization did not have controls in place to properly allocate, record and track actual costs incurred to the grant. Effect: Not having a system to track actual grant expenditures incurred properly to grants increases risk that improper expenses may be paid and charged to the federal program or charged at the wrong amount. Questioned Costs: Total known questioned costs are $53,986. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions were selected for testing, which accounted for $297,033 of $640,075 reported program expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management implement a process that allows for actual expenditures to tracked, allocated, and be billed to the specific program and ensure that supporting documentation of review is retained to demonstrate compliance with the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding Summary: The auditors identified certain expenditures tested lacked proper documentation of review and approval and those expenditures submitted for reimbursement were based on budgeted amounts expended rather than actual with no true up performed. They also identified one expenditure deemed potentially unallowable. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Televerde Foundation has experienced significant growth from inception in March 2020 to fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. We have grown from contributions and grants of $83 thousand and $50 thousand, respectively, in March 2020 to contributions and grants of $236 thousand and $978 thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2022. During this same period, Televerde Foundation went from 3 employees to 21 employees and experienced significant turnover in finance staff including 2 CFO’s, 2 Controllers, and four staff accountants. The growth combined with lack of a consistent finance team is the primary cause of this deficiency. To address the deficiency, management will perform the actions below. Management will leverage our general ledger to retain documentation for approval and review of expenditures. We will utilize actual amounts for expenditures and in circumstances where budgeted amounts are needed, we will perform a true-up on a quarterly basis. Responsible Individuals: Michelle Cirocco, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: July 2023
Although the reports were reviewed in accordance with internal controls, the review process did not properly identify on two out of the two reports tested that they were submitted with inaccurate information. Supporting documentation for the reports submitted used budgeted expensed amounts, not actual, and the budgeted expensed amounts for the period did not agree to amounts reported. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of information included in reports to ensure completeness and accuracy. Effect: Inaccurate information may be provided to the grantor regarding performance of the Foundation. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 reports submitted were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management routinely review and consider modifications that would strengthen the internal controls surrounding the reporting process, recordkeeping, and the management thereof. Specifically, management should ensure that financial records are such to provide actual amounts of grant expenditures incurred for reporting purposes at required reporting dates, and that the review control ensures that reports provided to grantors agree with internal financial records. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements, to assure performance expectations are being achieved, and to report these items in accordance with program requirements. The Foundation is required to submit quarterly performance reports. Reports should be prepared complete, accurate, and in accordance with the required basis for reporting, submitted timely with the terms of the grant award, and reviewed by an individual prior to submission to ensure accuracy. Condition: Although the reports were reviewed in accordance with internal controls, the review process did not properly identify on two out of the two reports tested that they were submitted with inaccurate information. Supporting documentation for the reports submitted used budgeted expensed amounts, not actual, and the budgeted expensed amounts for the period did not agree to amounts reported. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of information included in reports to ensure completeness and accuracy. Effect: Inaccurate information may be provided to the grantor regarding performance of the Foundation. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 reports submitted were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management routinely review and consider modifications that would strengthen the internal controls surrounding the reporting process, recordkeeping, and the management thereof. Specifically, management should ensure that financial records are such to provide actual amounts of grant expenditures incurred for reporting purposes at required reporting dates, and that the review control ensures that reports provided to grantors agree with internal financial records. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding Summary: The Foundation’s existing controls over federal award reporting did not identify and correct that reports submitted to the grantor were submitted with inaccurate information and that the supporting documentation used to prepare the reports were utilizing budgeted expensed amounts rather than actual. Furthermore, the budgeted expensed amounts from the supporting documentation that were the basis for the amounts to report, did not agree with the ultimate amount reported. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Televerde Foundation has experienced significant growth from inception in March 2020 to fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. We have grown from contributions and grants of $83 thousand and $50 thousand, respectively, in March 2020 to contributions and grants of $236 thousand and $978 thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2022. During this same period, Televerde Foundation went from 3 employees to 21 employees and experienced significant turnover in finance staff including 2 CFO’s, 2 Controllers, and four staff accountants. The growth combined with lack of a consistent finance team is the primary cause of this deficiency. To address the deficiency, management will perform the actions below. Management will leverage our general ledger to retain documentation for approval and review of expenditures. We will utilize actual amounts for expenditures and in circumstances where budgeted amounts are needed, we will perform a true-up on a quarterly basis. Management will perform quarterly reviews over financial reporting. Responsible Individuals: Michelle Cirocco, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: July 2023
The Foundation’s internal controls were not designed to properly ensure an review over program expenditures and that they were incurred within the grant award’s period of performance. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of expenditures charged to the program to ensure they were incurred within the period of performance. Effect: Lack of a formal review control over period of performance requirements increases the risk that expenditures could be submitted under the grant that are incurred outside of the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions were selected for testing, of which 51 out of 60 expenditures tested lacked proper documentation of review and approval with period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management implement a process that allows for expenditures claimed for reimbursement under federal awards to be reviewed to ensure those expenditures are incurred within the grant award’s period of performance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal awards that provide assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the conditions of the federal award. A complete system of internal controls requires all expenditures be properly approved and supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, all expenditures charged to the federal program are required to be reviewed to ensure they are within the grant award’s period of performance. Condition: The Foundation’s internal controls were not designed to properly ensure an review over program expenditures and that they were incurred within the grant award’s period of performance. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of expenditures charged to the program to ensure they were incurred within the period of performance. Effect: Lack of a formal review control over period of performance requirements increases the risk that expenditures could be submitted under the grant that are incurred outside of the period of performance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions were selected for testing, of which 51 out of 60 expenditures tested lacked proper documentation of review and approval with period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Foundation’s management implement a process that allows for expenditures claimed for reimbursement under federal awards to be reviewed to ensure those expenditures are incurred within the grant award’s period of performance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through State of Arizona, Maricopa County (Maricopa County), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #21.027, PE386182260A4 2022 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding Summary: The Foundation’s internal controls were not designed to properly ensure a review over program expenditures occurred that expenses being incurred and the basis for ultimate reimbursement were incurred within the grant award’s period of performance. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: Televerde Foundation has experienced significant growth from inception in March 2020 to fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. We have grown from contributions and grants of $83 thousand and $50 thousand, respectively, in March 2020 to contributions and grants of $236 thousand and $978 thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2022. During this same period, Televerde Foundation went from 3 employees to 21 employees and experienced significant turnover in finance staff including 2 CFO’s, 2 Controllers, and four staff accountants. The growth combined with lack of a consistent finance team is the primary cause of this deficiency. To address the deficiency, management will perform the actions below. Management will implement controls that address whether expenses incurred have a basis for reimbursement and are incurred within the period of performance. Responsible Individuals: Michelle Cirocco, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: March 2024
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arizona →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
