← Back to home

NORTHERN AREA LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDLocal Government

EIN: 850477634

UEI: P9FUDLN6XN46

Audited by: Hinkle +Landers, PC

Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

NORTHERN AREA LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD10 audit years6 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$4.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,075,083 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 25, 2026 (8 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,675,532 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2025 — management decision was due September 5, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,561,867 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,882,765 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2023 — management decision was due August 27, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,358,702 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2022 — management decision was due August 16, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$5,042,534 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2021 — management decision was due September 22, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$4,551,177 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2020 — management decision was due September 12, 2020.

2019-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001

2019-003 (2018-001) SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING (Material Weakness, Non-compliance) Statement of Condition During FY19, the NALWDB lacked proper sub-recipient monitoring procedures. It did not appear that any formal sub-recipient monitoring had been completed for the program year PY19. Discussion with current Board personnel during the audit indicated they felt that a former employee had performed program monitoring during the year, however there were no reports issued or available files to support this suggestion. We also confirmed with the Board?s fiscal agent that no fiscal monitoring has been performed at the Board level or regarding program sub-recipients. This is a repeat finding from the prior year. During the year the Board did not make significant improvement on resolving the non-compliance. Criteria 2 CFR ?200.328 (a) provides, the non-Federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the Federal award supported activities. The non-Federal entity must monitor its activities under Federal awards to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved. Monitoring by the non-Federal entity must cover each program, function or activity. 2 CFR ?200.430 (i) provides, in part, that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate. 2 CFR ?200.403 provides, in part, that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles (g) Be adequately documented Cause Significant transition at the Board hindered its ability to perform necessary monitoring efforts believed that the monitoring provided was adequate under the terms of the grant. Effect Without complete and accurate monitoring of sub-recipients expenditures of federal funds, NALWDB cannot ensure the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and charged in accordance with the applicable regulations. Recommendation NALWDB should ensure it properly monitors sub-recipients according to the requirements as required by the terms of the WIOA grant agreements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003 (2018-001) SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING (Material Weakness, Non-compliance) Statement of Condition During FY19, the NALWDB lacked proper sub-recipient monitoring procedures. It did not appear that any formal sub-recipient monitoring had been completed for the program year PY19. Discussion with current Board personnel during the audit indicated they felt that a former employee had performed program monitoring during the year, however there were no reports issued or available files to support this suggestion. We also confirmed with the Board?s fiscal agent that no fiscal monitoring has been performed at the Board level or regarding program sub-recipients. This is a repeat finding from the prior year. During the year the Board did not make significant improvement on resolving the non-compliance. Criteria 2 CFR ?200.328 (a) provides, the non-Federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the Federal award supported activities. The non-Federal entity must monitor its activities under Federal awards to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved. Monitoring by the non-Federal entity must cover each program, function or activity. 2 CFR ?200.430 (i) provides, in part, that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate. 2 CFR ?200.403 provides, in part, that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles (g) Be adequately documented Cause Significant transition at the Board hindered its ability to perform necessary monitoring efforts believed that the monitoring provided was adequate under the terms of the grant. Effect Without complete and accurate monitoring of sub-recipients expenditures of federal funds, NALWDB cannot ensure the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and charged in accordance with the applicable regulations. Recommendation NALWDB should ensure it properly monitors sub-recipients according to the requirements as required by the terms of the WIOA grant agreements.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-003 (2018-001) ? SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING (Material Weakness, Non-Compliance) ? Prior Year Finding-Repeated/Modified Name of contact person: Deborah Wildenstein Corrective Action: Currently due to transition in personnel, the Monitoring was not completed for PY 2017 and PY 2018 during the 2019 audit. However new staff has been hired for program monitoring and currently monitoring has been completed for PY 2017 & 2018 monitoring reviews. PY 2019 monitoring will be conducted beginning March 2020. Proposed Completion Date: PY 2017 & PY 2018 have been completed on February 2020 and Proposed completion of PY 2019 is May 2020.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2019-004
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002

2019-004 (2018-002) WIOA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (Other Non-compliance) Statement of Condition It was observed that the Board did not have certain policies and procedures required by WIOA and the Uniform Guidance. In many cases, the Board was relying on sub-recipients to have the policies in place. These included policies related to: ? Grievance and Complaint procedures: 20 CPR ?683.600(a), (b), and (c) ? Definition of "requires additional assistance" for out of school youth per 20 CPR ?681.300 ? Definition of "requires additional assistance" for ISY per 20 CPR ?681.310( a) ? Level of needs-related payments per 20 CPR ?680.970(a) and State Technical Assistance ? Guide, dated July 2015 ? Supportive services per 20 CPR ?680.900 ? Allowable Costs: 2 CFR ?200.302 (7) ? Financial Management: 2 CFR ?200.302 ? Payments: 2 CFR ??200.302(6), and 305 ? Internal Controls: 2 CFR ?200.303 ? Program Income: 2 CFR ?200.307 ? Equipment: 2 CFR ?200.313 ? Procurement: 2 CFR ? ?200 .317 and 318 ? Competition: 2 CFR ?200.319 ? Methods of Procurement to be followed: 2 CFR ?200.320 ? Requirements for pass-through entities: 2 CFR ?200.331 ? Cost Principles: 2 CFR ?200.400-475 This is a repeat finding from the prior year. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Board did not make significant progress toward implementing the required policies and procedures. Due to delays related to personnel transition and Board composition, the policies and procedures were not approved by the estimated completion date noted in management?s response from the prior year. Criteria 2 CFR ?200.303 (a) requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and related terms and conditions. TEGL No. 15-14, Section 5, Implementation of the Uniform Guidance, requires grantees to review and update all financial and administrative policies and procedures. Cause The Board believed that as long as the grant sub-recipient had all necessary policies in place it was adequate. Effect Without complete and accurate policies and procedures in place, the NALWDB was unable to ensure compliance with the WIOA grant. Recommendation NALWDB should implement all policies and procedures as required by the WIOA grant and Uniform Guidance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-004 (2018-002) WIOA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (Other Non-compliance) Statement of Condition It was observed that the Board did not have certain policies and procedures required by WIOA and the Uniform Guidance. In many cases, the Board was relying on sub-recipients to have the policies in place. These included policies related to: ? Grievance and Complaint procedures: 20 CPR ?683.600(a), (b), and (c) ? Definition of "requires additional assistance" for out of school youth per 20 CPR ?681.300 ? Definition of "requires additional assistance" for ISY per 20 CPR ?681.310( a) ? Level of needs-related payments per 20 CPR ?680.970(a) and State Technical Assistance ? Guide, dated July 2015 ? Supportive services per 20 CPR ?680.900 ? Allowable Costs: 2 CFR ?200.302 (7) ? Financial Management: 2 CFR ?200.302 ? Payments: 2 CFR ??200.302(6), and 305 ? Internal Controls: 2 CFR ?200.303 ? Program Income: 2 CFR ?200.307 ? Equipment: 2 CFR ?200.313 ? Procurement: 2 CFR ? ?200 .317 and 318 ? Competition: 2 CFR ?200.319 ? Methods of Procurement to be followed: 2 CFR ?200.320 ? Requirements for pass-through entities: 2 CFR ?200.331 ? Cost Principles: 2 CFR ?200.400-475 This is a repeat finding from the prior year. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Board did not make significant progress toward implementing the required policies and procedures. Due to delays related to personnel transition and Board composition, the policies and procedures were not approved by the estimated completion date noted in management?s response from the prior year. Criteria 2 CFR ?200.303 (a) requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and related terms and conditions. TEGL No. 15-14, Section 5, Implementation of the Uniform Guidance, requires grantees to review and update all financial and administrative policies and procedures. Cause The Board believed that as long as the grant sub-recipient had all necessary policies in place it was adequate. Effect Without complete and accurate policies and procedures in place, the NALWDB was unable to ensure compliance with the WIOA grant. Recommendation NALWDB should implement all policies and procedures as required by the WIOA grant and Uniform Guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-004 (2018-002) ? WIOA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ? Other Noncompliance ? Prior Year Finding - Repeated Name of contact person: Dr. LeAnne Salazar-Montoya Corrective Action: Policy and procedures noted in the audit report are currently in development and was presented to the Board for final approval on December 19, 2019. However, we had some revision and were resubmitted, and board approved on February 13, 2020 Proposed Completion Date: Completed and approved February 13, 2020

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Other →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,205,102 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2019 — management decision was due September 6, 2019.

2018-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2018-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-003
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,685,277 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2018 — management decision was due August 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,777,620 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.

2016-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Mexico

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.