Amador Health Center, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 850413619

UEI: NJPJB9HGR7B5

Audited by: SBNG, PC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Amador Health Center, Inc.9 audit years3 findings1 repeat
9
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,605,128 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 30, 2026 (60 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of sliding fee applications, we noted that one of the patients tested was assigned an incorrect sliding fee category based on available income information. In addition, for three patients, data extracted from the billing system reflected a different sliding fee category than that shown in the patient’s individual profile. Management attributed these discrepancies to a system glitch and to timing differences in updating the poverty guidelines within the billing system. Cause: Although management has established “Sliding Fee Scale Procedure” policies, the registration guidelines are not being consistently followed. Furthermore, monitoring procedures in the Athena system have not been sufficient to detect or prevent these recurring discrepancies. Effect: Failure to properly apply the sliding fee scale may result in patients being charged an incorrect fee or no fee, a condition could be placed on the grant’s Notice of Award if HRSA determines that the Organization is not demonstrating compliance with the sliding fee program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management provide periodic training to intake personnel to ensure accurate application of the sliding fee scale based on verified income and household information. In addition, management should enhance review and monitoring procedures within the Athena system to ensure the accuracy of patient data and coordinate with billing staff as needed to update poverty guidelines by a designated cut-off date. Management's response: Management agrees with auditor's recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Health Center Program Compliance Manual requires that a health center establish and maintain systems for determining sliding fee eligibility. The Organization should implement procedures to assess and reassess all patients’ income and family size in accordance with board-approved policies and applicable poverty guidelines. Additionally, management should establish a defined cutoff date for updating poverty guidelines in the billing system and implement a review process to ensure that patient records are properly updated when discrepancies between applied categories and recorded information occur. Condition: During our testing of sliding fee applications, we noted that one of the patients tested was assigned an incorrect sliding fee category based on available income information. In addition, for three patients, data extracted from the billing system reflected a different sliding fee category than that shown in the patient’s individual profile. Management attributed these discrepancies to a system glitch and to timing differences in updating the poverty guidelines within the billing system. Cause: Although management has established “Sliding Fee Scale Procedure” policies, the registration guidelines are not being consistently followed. Furthermore, monitoring procedures in the Athena system have not been sufficient to detect or prevent these recurring discrepancies. Effect: Failure to properly apply the sliding fee scale may result in patients being charged an incorrect fee or no fee, a condition could be placed on the grant’s Notice of Award if HRSA determines that the Organization is not demonstrating compliance with the sliding fee program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management provide periodic training to intake personnel to ensure accurate application of the sliding fee scale based on verified income and household information. In addition, management should enhance review and monitoring procedures within the Athena system to ensure the accuracy of patient data and coordinate with billing staff as needed to update poverty guidelines by a designated cut-off date. Management's response: Management agrees with auditor's recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Corrective Action Plan

Management’s View: During the recent audit, a finding was identified within the Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) related primarily to data entry errors, incomplete documentation, and lack of proper review. Errors included incorrect or missing income calculations, misclassification of SFDP categories, and inaccuracies entered into the EHR. These discrepancies were attributed to inconsistent staff performance, insufficient oversight, and gaps in training. Since the audit, the former Office Manager and two front desk employees responsible for SFDP data entry have left the organization. Proposed Corrective Action: 1. Strengthening Oversight & Accountability Office Manager Signature Required on ALL SFDP Forms signifying they have reviewed for accuracy, completeness, verified income documentation, ensure calculations are correct, and confirm appropriately and accurately entered into Athena software. 2. Updated Workflow & Process Improvement 3. Training & Competency Development - Annual Refresher Training (All Front Office Staff) The next training has already been scheduled for the week of December 8th. 4. Onboarding Process for New Front Office Employees A strengthened onboarding process will ensure new hires understand the SFDP accurately from day one. 5. Ongoing Monitoring & Quality Assurance Monthly Internal Reviews The Office Manager will audit a percentage of SFDP applications monthly, they will be documented and accuracy rates will be documented for all frontdesk staff. The Director of Administration will ensure these are maintained monthly. 6. Reinforcing the Importance of SFDP Accuracy Anticipated Completion Date: No later then December 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Diana Salcedo, Director of Administration

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,795,696 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2025 — management decision was due September 28, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,110,614 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,891,535 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

2022-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-002

During our procedures on the application of the sliding fee, it was noted that 2 out of 53 patients tested were placed on the incorrect sliding fee based on available information regarding the individual?s income. For 1 patient out of 53, no documentation was maintained supporting sliding fee placement. Cause: The Organization began training intake staff on policies regarding application of sliding fees during the fiscal year under audit; however, corrective action was not fully implemented due to lack of time. Effect: In addition to charging an incorrect fee or no fee to the patient, a condition could be placed on the grant?s Notice of Award if HRSA determines that the Organization is not demonstrating compliance with the sliding fee program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue providing trainings to intake personnel to ensure that patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. Management?s response: Management agrees with auditor recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Health Center Program Compliance Manual requires that a health center establish systems for sliding fee eligibility determination. The Organization should implement procedures that include assessing and re-assessing all patients for income and family size consistent with board-approved policies and poverty guidelines, including the maintenance of related records of such assessments. Condition: During our procedures on the application of the sliding fee, it was noted that 2 out of 53 patients tested were placed on the incorrect sliding fee based on available information regarding the individual?s income. For 1 patient out of 53, no documentation was maintained supporting sliding fee placement. Cause: The Organization began training intake staff on policies regarding application of sliding fees during the fiscal year under audit; however, corrective action was not fully implemented due to lack of time. Effect: In addition to charging an incorrect fee or no fee to the patient, a condition could be placed on the grant?s Notice of Award if HRSA determines that the Organization is not demonstrating compliance with the sliding fee program requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue providing trainings to intake personnel to ensure that patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. Management?s response: Management agrees with auditor recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s view: Management agrees with auditor recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion. Proposed corrective action: Continue to revisit procedures to ensure patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. All front office staff and backup staff have and will continue to receive annual training from an expert on the sliding scale fee. The Office Manager has put steps in place to ensure proper data entry into the Electronic Medical Records system by front office staff. These steps include, detailed document outlining step by step instructions for data entry pertaining to SSF for office staff, periodic audits of patient charts and continued training of staff. Amador Health is implementing a new Electronic Health Records that is expected to streamline processes and provide additional training for staff. Anticipated correction date: September 15, 2023, allowing for implementation of new system and training. Responsible official: Eileen McKeen, CFO

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,086,783 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 8, 2022 — management decision was due February 8, 2023.

2021-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our procedures on the application of the sliding fee, it was noted that 2 out of 25 patients tested were placed on the incorrect sliding fee based on available information regarding the individual?s income. Cause: The health center experienced turnover during the year under audit which caused a disruption in the intake process for patients admitted with sliding fee discounts. Effect: An incorrect fee or no fee was charged to the patient. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. In addition, we recommend that new staff receive appropriate training on the health center?s policies regarding application of sliding fees. Management?s response: Management agrees with auditor recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Health Center Program Compliance Manual requires that a health center establish systems for sliding fee eligibility determination. The health center should implement procedures that include assessing and re-assessing all patients for income and family size consistent with board-approved policies and poverty guidelines. Condition: During our procedures on the application of the sliding fee, it was noted that 2 out of 25 patients tested were placed on the incorrect sliding fee based on available information regarding the individual?s income. Cause: The health center experienced turnover during the year under audit which caused a disruption in the intake process for patients admitted with sliding fee discounts. Effect: An incorrect fee or no fee was charged to the patient. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure that patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. In addition, we recommend that new staff receive appropriate training on the health center?s policies regarding application of sliding fees. Management?s response: Management agrees with auditor recommendation. Refer to Corrective Action Plan for expected date of completion.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s view: Management was dealing with high staff turnover in Office Manager and Front Office staff with experience and training in Sliding Fee data entry into the electronic health records during the COVID Pandemic. Vacancies were due to employees' choice to leave or illness of staff and/or their family members. Proposed corrective action: Revisit established procedures to ensure that patients are placed on the correct sliding fee category based on information provided upon admission and that the fee determination is reviewed and updated as needed. In addition, we recommend that new staff receive appropriate training on the health center?s policies regarding application of sliding fees. Staff training for the Sliding Fee with experts in this area was implemented mid-2021. This training has already occurred twice and will recur annually for staff to include the office manager, front office and employees who cover for front office staff when needed. The Office Manager has reviewed the policy, does a weekly internal audit of patient charts and staff data entry then follows up with staff regarding errors found. Anticipated correction date: August 31, 2022, following up on actions implemented. Responsible official: Eileen McKeen, CFO.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,498,945 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021 — management decision was due September 30, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,426,416 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2020 — management decision was due September 4, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,460,119 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2019 — management decision was due August 10, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,376,896 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.