← Back to home

SAN JUAN COLLEGEHigher Education

EIN: 850295969

UEI: R8MXJRCHRVG9

Audited by: CORDOVA CPAS LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

SAN JUAN COLLEGE8 audit years9 findings4 repeat
8
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$17.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$17,752,578 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 29, 2024 (644 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-005
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The College’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, single audit reporting package was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after the end of the audit period as required by 2 CFR Section 200.50(c). Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that the Single Audit reporting package be submitted within nine months after the end of the audit period. Effect: The College is not in compliance with reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College experienced significant turnover during this fiscal year, and it resulted in both operations and closing of the previous fiscal year to be delayed which made everything late. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the College should work to catch up the closing process in order to ensure that the next year’s audit is performed timely in order for the next year’s audit reporting package to be submitted by the federal clearing house due date. Agency’s Response: With the ERP conversion project mostly behind it, and a key staff vacancy filled, the College fully expects that in FY24 it will again be to resume its long-time pattern of timely filing its Single Audit reporting package incompliance with the Uniform Guidance. The Controller and/or Assistant Controller(s) are responsible for insuring success in this.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program information: Funding agency: All Programs Title: All Programs Federal Assistance Listing Number: All Programs Compliance Requirement Reporting Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Condition: The College’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, single audit reporting package was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after the end of the audit period as required by 2 CFR Section 200.50(c). Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that the Single Audit reporting package be submitted within nine months after the end of the audit period. Effect: The College is not in compliance with reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College experienced significant turnover during this fiscal year, and it resulted in both operations and closing of the previous fiscal year to be delayed which made everything late. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the College should work to catch up the closing process in order to ensure that the next year’s audit is performed timely in order for the next year’s audit reporting package to be submitted by the federal clearing house due date. Agency’s Response: With the ERP conversion project mostly behind it, and a key staff vacancy filled, the College fully expects that in FY24 it will again be to resume its long-time pattern of timely filing its Single Audit reporting package incompliance with the Uniform Guidance. The Controller and/or Assistant Controller(s) are responsible for insuring success in this.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-005 Single Audit Report Submission (Non-Compliance) • The College will timely submit its FY24 Audit Report in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. • The Controller is responsible for compliance

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$21,856,087 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2023 — management decision was due July 3, 2023.

2022-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-004

In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds, we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 3 out of 25 students examined, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. ? One student?s calculation of return of funds was incorrect, the amount of funds returned should have been $520 but $887 was returned to the Department of Education. The College did not make complete progress in fiscal year 2022. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements and because of one student?s miscalculation of returned funds, the College sent $367 more to the Department of Education than the required amount. Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for a few of our samples examined because the financial aid office was not made aware certain students were no longer attending the College until after the end of the semester. The calculated dates for return of funds are the last date the student attended the College which meant that the College?s staff would not be informed of the withdrawal until after the 45 days was lapsed. All three of these instances had money transferred within 45 days of the semester end. The incorrect calculation of the one student occurred when there was a change in the student?s status of loan funds awarded; the change was not updated appropriately in the College?s system (Colleague), which resulted in the incorrect calculation. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College ensure that the professors inform the financial aid office as soon as a student is no longer attending classes so that the College can ensure they send the Return of Title IV funds within the required 45 days and that when calculating the return of funds, the staff review to ensure they have taken into account all changes of the student status. Agency Response: Management agrees with this finding to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. ? Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. At the end of the semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Timeline: Management has already implemented the corrective actions. ? Mindi Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Greg Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds, we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 3 out of 25 students examined, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. ? One student?s calculation of return of funds was incorrect, the amount of funds returned should have been $520 but $887 was returned to the Department of Education. The College did not make complete progress in fiscal year 2022. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements and because of one student?s miscalculation of returned funds, the College sent $367 more to the Department of Education than the required amount. Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for a few of our samples examined because the financial aid office was not made aware certain students were no longer attending the College until after the end of the semester. The calculated dates for return of funds are the last date the student attended the College which meant that the College?s staff would not be informed of the withdrawal until after the 45 days was lapsed. All three of these instances had money transferred within 45 days of the semester end. The incorrect calculation of the one student occurred when there was a change in the student?s status of loan funds awarded; the change was not updated appropriately in the College?s system (Colleague), which resulted in the incorrect calculation. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College ensure that the professors inform the financial aid office as soon as a student is no longer attending classes so that the College can ensure they send the Return of Title IV funds within the required 45 days and that when calculating the return of funds, the staff review to ensure they have taken into account all changes of the student status. Agency Response: Management agrees with this finding to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. ? Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. At the end of the semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Timeline: Management has already implemented the corrective actions. ? Mindi Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Greg Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with this finding to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. ? Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. At the end of the semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Timeline: Management has already implemented the corrective actions. ? Mindi Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Greg Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Prior Finding References

2021-004

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,662,366 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2021 — management decision was due June 29, 2022.

2021-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-003

In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 8 out of 25 students examined, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for many of our samples examined because the deadline for sending the funds either occurred during the winter break or soon after the winter break. The College?s staff also were not in the College?s offices during part of the year due to the COVID-19 pandemic which caused delays. Of the eight late students tested, six of them were unofficial withdrawals which meant the College?s staff was not made aware of the withdrawal until after the semester ended but had calculated dates that were at the mid-point of the semester which meant that the College?s staff would not be informed of the withdrawal until after the 45 days was lapsed. Five of these instances had money transferred within 45 days of the semester end. Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of the Return of Title IV funds for the Official withdrawals to ensure that they are remitting the funds to the Department of Education within the 45-days as required. Agency Response: Management agrees with this finding to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. ? Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. At the end of the semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-004 ? Return of Title IV Funds (Significant Deficiency) Repeated and Modified from FS 2020-003 Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 8 out of 25 students examined, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for many of our samples examined because the deadline for sending the funds either occurred during the winter break or soon after the winter break. The College?s staff also were not in the College?s offices during part of the year due to the COVID-19 pandemic which caused delays. Of the eight late students tested, six of them were unofficial withdrawals which meant the College?s staff was not made aware of the withdrawal until after the semester ended but had calculated dates that were at the mid-point of the semester which meant that the College?s staff would not be informed of the withdrawal until after the 45 days was lapsed. Five of these instances had money transferred within 45 days of the semester end. Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of the Return of Title IV funds for the Official withdrawals to ensure that they are remitting the funds to the Department of Education within the 45-days as required. Agency Response: Management agrees with this finding to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. ? Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. At the end of the semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Corrective Action Plan

According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), a return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations is required when a student does not attend all of the days the student was scheduled to complete within a period of enrollments. A student who does not complete his/her payment period is considered to have withdrawn whether or not credits were earned. The R2T4 calculation is done to determine the amount of aid earned by the student. Title IV funds are required to be returned no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines the student withdrew. ? To meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds, Financial Aid is running a weekly report to capture all students that have dropped/withdrawn from classes. This became important with the impact of COVID-19 on students which caused disruptions and difficulty in managing course loads. At the end of each semester (fall, spring or summer), a report is run to identify withdrawals, failed, or incomplete grades to determine if a return of funds calculation is warranted. Financial Aid processes had a built in assumption that failed grades were unearned but, in reviewing and updating our processes most failed grades are actually earned. The return of funds has traditionally been calculated with the assumption the student did not earn the failed grade so the mid-point of the term was used for last date of attendance. ? Financial Aid is updating processes based on actuals and will continue working with Learning on the most efficient methodology to determine if a student has earned a failed grade or has stopped attending during the semester. ? Financial Aid will generate a weekly report to identify student withdrawals utilizing a new reporting tool being implemented late 2021. With the enhanced reporting tool and changes in methodology and process?s, we fully anticipate the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Financial Aid Office has communicated with the Vice-President of Learning about the necessity for proper reporting by faculty with regards to non-attendance reporting and last date of attendance. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Prior Finding References

2020-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-004

During our verification testwork, we noted deviations from the College?s key controls over the verification process. Students are flagged to be verified in the Colleague system by the Department of Education and this is completed by one of the College?s employees, reviewed and approved by a student advisor who is deemed by the College to be a qualified person to ensure accuracy of the verification. Our examination revealed the following: ? In 3 out of 53 verifications examined, we noted that there was no evidence of a verification form for the current year under audit, there was evidence of this being completed for these students in past school years but not for fiscal year 2021 for which they were chosen to receive an updated verification completed. ? In 1 out of 53 verifications examined, we noted that there was no documented review on the verification worksheet documenting evidence of a review of the worksheet. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College either did not perform an updated verification for fiscal year 2021 or the documentation of the verification was not retained as required by the College?s procedures for review of the auditor. For the missing signature, the student advisor either did not review the verification tested or reviewed but did not sign off that they reviewed the worksheet. Effect: San Juan College is in violation of its internal controls over compliance of having a student advisor review all verification worksheets for the Student Financial Aid Program. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that San Juan College ensure that all verification worksheets are reviewed, filed and signed to document that reviews have been performed. Agency Response: Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, financial aid advisors worked diligently to follow all compliance items regarding internal controls. Duplicate files were created for review, records in question did not get initialed due to duplication. ? Operating efficiencies were gained using electronic resources for managing student data. Advisors now have the ability to upload student information, review, update and award through the ERP system. If information is missing, the record stays in the queue and students is electronically notified that additional information is needed. Verification and controls are built into the electronic processes, which not only allows for a clean review it also enhances internal controls. The advisor signature field must be complete before awarding can take place, which insures verification has been properly completed. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: During our verification testwork, we noted deviations from the College?s key controls over the verification process. Students are flagged to be verified in the Colleague system by the Department of Education and this is completed by one of the College?s employees, reviewed and approved by a student advisor who is deemed by the College to be a qualified person to ensure accuracy of the verification. Our examination revealed the following: ? In 3 out of 53 verifications examined, we noted that there was no evidence of a verification form for the current year under audit, there was evidence of this being completed for these students in past school years but not for fiscal year 2021 for which they were chosen to receive an updated verification completed. ? In 1 out of 53 verifications examined, we noted that there was no documented review on the verification worksheet documenting evidence of a review of the worksheet. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College either did not perform an updated verification for fiscal year 2021 or the documentation of the verification was not retained as required by the College?s procedures for review of the auditor. For the missing signature, the student advisor either did not review the verification tested or reviewed but did not sign off that they reviewed the worksheet. Effect: San Juan College is in violation of its internal controls over compliance of having a student advisor review all verification worksheets for the Student Financial Aid Program. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that San Juan College ensure that all verification worksheets are reviewed, filed and signed to document that reviews have been performed. Agency Response: Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, financial aid advisors worked diligently to follow all compliance items regarding internal controls. Duplicate files were created for review, records in question did not get initialed due to duplication. ? Operating efficiencies were gained using electronic resources for managing student data. Advisors now have the ability to upload student information, review, update and award through the ERP system. If information is missing, the record stays in the queue and students is electronically notified that additional information is needed. Verification and controls are built into the electronic processes, which not only allows for a clean review it also enhances internal controls. The advisor signature field must be complete before awarding can take place, which insures verification has been properly completed. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the process.

Corrective Action Plan

According to 34 CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. ? The COVID-19 shutdown and remote work environment encouraged major efficiencies for managing student data through an electronic resource. A work-flow was established through the ?On-Base system?. Students upload their verification documents to On-Base for the financial aid advisors to review. ? Advisors now have the ability to review and process the student information electronically through the ERP system and/or make the final awards for the year. If something is missing, the record remains in the queue and students are notified additional information is needed. ? Verification and controls are built into the electronic processes, allowing for an automatic review which enhances internal controls. ? Students receive automatic email message regarding the status of their file, incomplete or complete. A students record will not leave the queue until it is complete. Students access ?Self-Service? for review of their electronic information. There is an advisor signature field that must be complete before awarding can take place. This insures verification has been completed properly. ? Mindi-Kim Schrum, Sr. Director and/or Gary Gallegos, Assistant Director will oversee the process.

Prior Finding References

2020-004

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-006
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,888,722 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2021 — management decision was due July 10, 2021.

2020-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-002

In our testwork over the disbursements of federal loans to students, we noted 2 out of 25 students tested were first semester students who received their student loan funds within the first 30 days of the student?s first day of classes. The College has made some progress towards implementing their corrective action plan from the prior year and are working on completing the implementation of their plan during fiscal year 2021. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.164(i)(2), Institutions may not disburse or deliver the first installment of direct loans to first-year undergraduates who are first time borrowers until 30 days after the student?s first day of classes. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College disbursed the loan funds for all students approximately the same time period for the semesters without reviewing to verify which students were first-year undergraduates. Effect: The College is out of compliance with the disbursements to students for the Direct Student Loans. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of disbursements of student loans to ensure any new first-year undergraduates do not receive their student loan funds until 30 days after their classes start. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with the finding and recommendations to address the student loan processes regarding first time borrowers. Financial Aid has already created and implemented a query to identify first time borrowers in order to cross reference the loan code assigned. ? Advisors have received and will continue additional training on all direct loan borrowing processes. A requirement will be established, in FY21, for advisors to review students loan history in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) before processing a loan. If the student has never borrowed or previously borrowed a loan period code with an automatic 30-day delay will be assigned. The code automatically sets the first disbursement to 30 days after the start of the semester for specific borrowing period based on established rules. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will monitor the policies and procedures to ensure they are being followed correctly.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 - Notification of Disbursements of Loan Funds (Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency)) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: In our testwork over the disbursements of federal loans to students, we noted 2 out of 25 students tested were first semester students who received their student loan funds within the first 30 days of the student?s first day of classes. The College has made some progress towards implementing their corrective action plan from the prior year and are working on completing the implementation of their plan during fiscal year 2021. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.164(i)(2), Institutions may not disburse or deliver the first installment of direct loans to first-year undergraduates who are first time borrowers until 30 days after the student?s first day of classes. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College disbursed the loan funds for all students approximately the same time period for the semesters without reviewing to verify which students were first-year undergraduates. Effect: The College is out of compliance with the disbursements to students for the Direct Student Loans. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of disbursements of student loans to ensure any new first-year undergraduates do not receive their student loan funds until 30 days after their classes start. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with the finding and recommendations to address the student loan processes regarding first time borrowers. Financial Aid has already created and implemented a query to identify first time borrowers in order to cross reference the loan code assigned. ? Advisors have received and will continue additional training on all direct loan borrowing processes. A requirement will be established, in FY21, for advisors to review students loan history in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) before processing a loan. If the student has never borrowed or previously borrowed a loan period code with an automatic 30-day delay will be assigned. The code automatically sets the first disbursement to 30 days after the start of the semester for specific borrowing period based on established rules. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will monitor the policies and procedures to ensure they are being followed correctly.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-002 - Disbursements to Students for Direct Loan Funds (Significant Deficiency) According to 34 CFR 668.164(i)(2), Institutions may not disburse or deliver the first installment of direct loans to first-year undergraduates who are first time borrowers until 30 days after the student?s first day of classes. ? Financial Aid has already created a query to identify first time borrowers in order to cross reference the loan code assigned. If the student has never borrowed or previously borrowed a loan period code with an automatic 30-day delay will be assigned. ? Advisors are receiving training on all direct loan borrowing processes, with a requirement being added in FY21 for the review of student loan history in the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). ? Financial Aid Advisors will document the research conducted in NSLDS and initial their work. ? The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Sr. Director of Financial Aid and the Vice-President of Student Affairs.

Prior Finding References

2019-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 11 out of 25 students tested, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. ? One student?s calculation of return of funds that was incorrect; the amount of funds returned should have been $1,042, but only $152 was returned to the Department of Education. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for many of our samples examined was because the deadline for sending the funds either occurred during the winter break or soon after the winter break. The College?s staff were catching up on many tasks before getting to the return of funds. The incorrect calculation of the one student occurred when there was a change in the student?s status of loan funds awarded; the change was not updated appropriately in the College?s system (Colleague), which resulted in the incorrect calculation. Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of the Return of Title IV funds to ensure that they are remitting the funds to the Department of Education within the 45-days as required. We also recommend that student?s calculation of the return of funds be reviewed after any changes have been made to their status. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with this finding and recommendations to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. Financial Aid has already updated their policy and procedures to include running a weekly report to capture all students that have disenrolled from classes. In FY21 the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-003 ? Return of Title IV Funds (Significant Deficiency) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: In our testwork over the Return of Title IV funds we noted the following noncompliance: ? In 11 out of 25 students tested, the College did not return the funds to the Department of Education in the required 45 days after the withdrawal date of the student. ? One student?s calculation of return of funds that was incorrect; the amount of funds returned should have been $1,042, but only $152 was returned to the Department of Education. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), return of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the Student Financial Assistance account or electronic fund transfers initiated to the Education Department as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. According to 34 CFR 668.22(g), The institution must return the lesser of (1) the total amount of unearned Title IV assistance to be returned as described above, or (2) an amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student. If, for a non-term program, an institution chooses to calculate the treatment of Title IV assistance on a payment period basis, but the institution charges for a period that is longer than the payment period, ?total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period? is the greater of (1) the prorated amount of institutional charges for the longer period, or (2) the amount of Title IV assistance retained for institutional charges as of the student?s withdrawal date Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College was late in sending the returned funds to the Department of Education for many of our samples examined was because the deadline for sending the funds either occurred during the winter break or soon after the winter break. The College?s staff were catching up on many tasks before getting to the return of funds. The incorrect calculation of the one student occurred when there was a change in the student?s status of loan funds awarded; the change was not updated appropriately in the College?s system (Colleague), which resulted in the incorrect calculation. Effect: The College returned Title IV funds to the Department of Education later than the timeframe required by the program requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) regarding the timing of the Return of Title IV funds to ensure that they are remitting the funds to the Department of Education within the 45-days as required. We also recommend that student?s calculation of the return of funds be reviewed after any changes have been made to their status. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with this finding and recommendations to meet compliance with the 45 day return of Title IV funds. Financial Aid has already updated their policy and procedures to include running a weekly report to capture all students that have disenrolled from classes. In FY21 the return of funds will be calculated and remitted to the Department of Education within the required time. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will oversee the implementation of these.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-003 ? Return of Title IV Funds (Significant Deficiency) According to 34 CFR 668.173(b), a return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations is required when a student does not attend all of the days the student was scheduled to complete within a period of enrollments. A student who does not complete his/her payment period is considered to have withdrawn whether or not credits were earned. The R2T4 calculation is done to determine the amount of aid earned by the student. Title IV funds are required to be returned no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines the student withdrew. ? Financial Aid has already updated their policy and procedures to include running a weekly report to capture all students that have disenrolled from classes. This process will assist in identifying students that have disenrolled from classes. ? A review of the R2T4 calculation will be performed when changes are brought to Financial Aid?s attention by Records and Registration. ? In FY21 Calculations will be completed within the 45 day period and notification will be issued to students. ? Financial Aid will work with Learning for processes that require faculty to report non-attendance, last day of attendance, and any course changes promptly so that financial aid awards can be adjusted timely and correctly based on actual enrollment. ? The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Sr. Director of Financial Aid and the Vice-President of Student Affairs.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our verification testwork, we noted deviations from the College?s key controls over the verification process. Students are flagged to be verified in the Colleague system by the Department of Education and this is completed by one of the College?s employees, reviewed and approved by a student advisor who is deemed by the College to be a qualified person to ensure accuracy of the verification. In 3 out of 40 verifications tested, we noted that there was no documented review on the verification worksheet showing evidence of a review of the worksheet. Criteria: According to 34CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. Cause: The student advisor either did not review the verifications tested or reviewed but did not sign off that they reviewed the worksheet. Effect: San Juan College is in violation of its internal controls over compliance of having a student advisor review all verification worksheets for the Student Financial Aid Program. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that San Juan College ensure that all verification worksheets are reviewed and signed to document that reviews have been performed. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Advisors failed to sign off on the completed verification worksheets and a review was not performed. To ensure proper procedures are followed by the advisors including signing off on compleded worksheets, effective in the first half of FY21 an independent review will be performed by another advisor or other qualified personnel to verify completion. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will oversee the process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-004 Controls over Verification of Students for the Student Financial Aid Program (Significant Deficiency) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: During our verification testwork, we noted deviations from the College?s key controls over the verification process. Students are flagged to be verified in the Colleague system by the Department of Education and this is completed by one of the College?s employees, reviewed and approved by a student advisor who is deemed by the College to be a qualified person to ensure accuracy of the verification. In 3 out of 40 verifications tested, we noted that there was no documented review on the verification worksheet showing evidence of a review of the worksheet. Criteria: According to 34CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. Cause: The student advisor either did not review the verifications tested or reviewed but did not sign off that they reviewed the worksheet. Effect: San Juan College is in violation of its internal controls over compliance of having a student advisor review all verification worksheets for the Student Financial Aid Program. Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that San Juan College ensure that all verification worksheets are reviewed and signed to document that reviews have been performed. Agency Response: ? Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Advisors failed to sign off on the completed verification worksheets and a review was not performed. To ensure proper procedures are followed by the advisors including signing off on compleded worksheets, effective in the first half of FY21 an independent review will be performed by another advisor or other qualified personnel to verify completion. ? The Sr. Director and/or the Assistant Director will oversee the process.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-004 Controls over Verification of Students for the Student Financial Aid Program (Significant Deficiency) According to 34 CFR 668.51 through 668.61, an institution is required to establish written policies and procedures for verifying applicant information. ? Financial Aid has policies and procedures for verification which requires advisors to review data and initial the internal controls verification worksheet. ? To ensure proper procedures are followed by the advisors, effective in the first half of FY21 all worksheets will be independently reviewed and signed off by another advisor or other qualified personnel for completion. ? The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Sr. Director of Financial Aid and the Assistant Director of Financial Aid.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,201,904 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2020 — management decision was due September 3, 2020.

2019-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

In our testwork over the disbursements of federal loans to or on behalf of students, we noted 14 out of 25 students tested that did not receive their notification letter within the required 30-day period before or after the date of disbursement. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.165, Institutions that implement an affirmative confirmation process must make a notification to the student or parent no earlier than 30 days before, and no later than 30 days after, crediting the student?s account at the institution with Direct Loan or TEACH grants. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College attempted to get ahead on their workload and send out many of the notification letters early in the summer for both the fall and spring semesters. Effect: The College is out of compliance with the notification requirements set for Direct Student Loans. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) over the timing of notifications with regards to the disbursements of student loans to ensure all notification letters for loan disbursements are sent either 30 days before or 30 days after the disbursement of funds. Agency Response: Effective with the 2019-2020 academic year, the Financial Aid Office has revised its notification process for loan notification procedures under 34 CFR 668.165 to insure that the required notification is being sent by email on the date the disbursement happens. The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Senior Director of Financial Aid and the Vice President of Student Services.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 - Notification of Disbursements of Loan Funds (Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Education Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, & 84.268 Award year: July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Condition: In our testwork over the disbursements of federal loans to or on behalf of students, we noted 14 out of 25 students tested that did not receive their notification letter within the required 30-day period before or after the date of disbursement. Criteria: According to 34 CFR 668.165, Institutions that implement an affirmative confirmation process must make a notification to the student or parent no earlier than 30 days before, and no later than 30 days after, crediting the student?s account at the institution with Direct Loan or TEACH grants. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The College attempted to get ahead on their workload and send out many of the notification letters early in the summer for both the fall and spring semesters. Effect: The College is out of compliance with the notification requirements set for Direct Student Loans. Auditor?s Recommendations: We recommend that the College adjust their process(es) over the timing of notifications with regards to the disbursements of student loans to ensure all notification letters for loan disbursements are sent either 30 days before or 30 days after the disbursement of funds. Agency Response: Effective with the 2019-2020 academic year, the Financial Aid Office has revised its notification process for loan notification procedures under 34 CFR 668.165 to insure that the required notification is being sent by email on the date the disbursement happens. The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Senior Director of Financial Aid and the Vice President of Student Services.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-003: Loan notification not consistent within the 30 day time frame Effective with the 2019-2020 academic year, the Financial Aid Office has revised its notification process for loan notification procedures under 34 CFR 668.165 to insure that the required notification is being sent by email on the date the disbursement happens. ? As loan funds are transmitted to the Business Office for application to student account or disbursement, contemporaneous notification to student is being sent. This will meet the requirement that notification to student occur no earlier than 30 days before, and no later than 30 days after crediting the student?s account with direct loan. ? The contact person responsible for monitoring and maintaining corrective procedures is the Senior Director of Financial Aid and the Vice President of Student Services.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,759,130 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2019 — management decision was due July 13, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,227,609 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,905,960 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2017 — management decision was due July 8, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Mexico

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.