← Back to home

Bayfield School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 846001442

UEI: SADFAQPC8DM3

Audited by: RubinBrown LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Bayfield School District4 audit years3 findings
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$1,028,295 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 18, 2024 (778 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Eligibility Material Weakness, Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: The Child Nutrition Cluster programs provide food related benefits to eligible children in public and summer programs. The District is responsible for determining the eligibility program participants based on the program requirements. Condition and Cause: The District did not have documented internal controls over the eligibility determinations for the period under audit. Effect: The District may not timely detect errors in eligibility determinations for program participants Questioned Costs: None Context: 60 participant eligibility determination were reviewed. Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that District management ensure effective internal controls are consistently documented. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has put together a correction action plan for the finding. See corrective action plan included in this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Eligibility Material Weakness, Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: The Child Nutrition Cluster programs provide food related benefits to eligible children in public and summer programs. The District is responsible for determining the eligibility program participants based on the program requirements. Condition and Cause: The District did not have documented internal controls over the eligibility determinations for the period under audit. Effect: The District may not timely detect errors in eligibility determinations for program participants Questioned Costs: None Context: 60 participant eligibility determination were reviewed. Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that District management ensure effective internal controls are consistently documented. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has put together a correction action plan for the finding. See corrective action plan included in this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Material Weakness, Internal Control over Compliance Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Julie Whitmore, Director of Nutrition Services and Leon Hanhardt, Superintendent of Schools Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024 Corrective Action Plan: The District will document the review of a sampling of eligibility determinations for program participants.

About Eligibility →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,462,030 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2023 — management decision was due July 19, 2023.

2022-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The initial SEFA was inaccurate, which led to errors in reporting federal awards. The District incorrectly reported expenditures within two programs totaling $220,070 that were in excess of actual expenditures. Cause: The District did not have adequate training and oversight in place for accounting staff to ensure its SEFA was prepared in accordance with federal requirements. The District received new sources of federal funding, and the preparer and reviewer were not familiar with federal requirements and the guidance for the SEFA; this resulted in the errors noted above. Effect: As a result of the errors, the SEFA was materially incorrect. Inaccurate identification of federal awards may also result in inaccurate identification of compliance requirements, risk assessments, major program determination, materiality determinations and reporting errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: N/A Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: The District should strengthen its internal controls by implementing additional training and oversight of personnel to ensure the SEFA accurately reflects federal expenditures for the fiscal year. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has put together a correction action plan for the finding. See corrective action plan included in this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness, Inaccurate Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (The SEFA) Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) provides guidance related to preparation and reporting of a SEFA. 2 CFR Section 200.100 identifies the required elements of the SEFA and 2 CFR Section 200.510 specifically requires that the SEFA include information on each federal award expended during the year. The District is required to prepare a complete and accurate SEFA and to have a system of internal controls, the design and operation of which allows management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions to prevent, or detect and correct, errors on a timely basis. Condition: The initial SEFA was inaccurate, which led to errors in reporting federal awards. The District incorrectly reported expenditures within two programs totaling $220,070 that were in excess of actual expenditures. Cause: The District did not have adequate training and oversight in place for accounting staff to ensure its SEFA was prepared in accordance with federal requirements. The District received new sources of federal funding, and the preparer and reviewer were not familiar with federal requirements and the guidance for the SEFA; this resulted in the errors noted above. Effect: As a result of the errors, the SEFA was materially incorrect. Inaccurate identification of federal awards may also result in inaccurate identification of compliance requirements, risk assessments, major program determination, materiality determinations and reporting errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: N/A Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: The District should strengthen its internal controls by implementing additional training and oversight of personnel to ensure the SEFA accurately reflects federal expenditures for the fiscal year. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has put together a correction action plan for the finding. See corrective action plan included in this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-002 Material Weakness, Inaccurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: John Moore, Director of Finance and Leon Hanhardt, Superintendent Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2023 Corrective Action Plan: District personnel will agree amounts reported on the SEFA to the corresponding expenditures recorded in the general ledger and an individual independent of preparation of the SEFA will review the report.

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,782,716 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2022 — management decision was due August 6, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$781,838 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 28, 2021 — management decision was due January 28, 2022.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District, did not have consistently documented internal controls over allowable costs and activities for the specified period of performance by the grant. There was partially documented evidence of internal controls over the expenditure review process within the 60 transactions tested. Cause: A documented review process was not consistently in place during the year ended June 30, 2020. Effect: Due to insufficient monitoring and internal controls over compliance, the District may not timely detect an error in allowable costs and activities determinations and may incur unallowable expenditures which would be required to be funded with funds other than federal funds. Questioned Costs: Not applicable Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions was selected for testing. Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the program management ensure that effective internal controls are effectively designed and consistently documented. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has created a corrective action plan for the finding. See the corrective action plan included in this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-001 Allowable Costs And Cost Principles, Allowable Activities And Period Of Performance Significant Deficiency, Internal Control Over Compliance CFDA 21.019 - Coronavirus Relief Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria Or Specific Requirement: Certain costs and activities are considered allowable if they are incurred during the period of performance as outlined in the grant agreement and related Uniform Guidance. Each activity and expenditure that is paid for using federal funds must be considered allowable and be within the period of performance in accordance with the guidance outlined within grant agreement and Uniform Guidance. The District is expected to have internal controls over the expenditure process that ensures only allowable costs and activities for the specified period of performance are allocated to federal funds. Condition: The District, did not have consistently documented internal controls over allowable costs and activities for the specified period of performance by the grant. There was partially documented evidence of internal controls over the expenditure review process within the 60 transactions tested. Cause: A documented review process was not consistently in place during the year ended June 30, 2020. Effect: Due to insufficient monitoring and internal controls over compliance, the District may not timely detect an error in allowable costs and activities determinations and may incur unallowable expenditures which would be required to be funded with funds other than federal funds. Questioned Costs: Not applicable Context: A nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions was selected for testing. Identification As A Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the program management ensure that effective internal controls are effectively designed and consistently documented. Views Of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Action: The District agrees with the finding and has created a corrective action plan for the finding. See the corrective action plan included in this report.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Finding 2020-001 Allowable Costs and Cost Principles, Allowable Activities and Period Of Performance Significant Deficiency, Internal Control over Compliance Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: John Moore, Director of Finance and Dr. K. Kevin Aten, Superintendent of Schools Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2021 Corrective Action Plan: The Bayfield School District agrees with the auditors? recommendation that a documented review process should be in place for Federal Awards to better enable the district to timely detect potential errors in allowable costs, allowable activities, and proper period of performance determinations. By September 30, 2021, the district will create and include a review process by which, once an expenditure has been determined to be an allowable cost allocable to a Federal Award, a summary with supporting documentation will be created and forwarded to a reviewer. The reviewer will evaluate the summary based on compliance requirements as outlined in state and federal rules. The reviewer will sign and date the summary confirming that the determination of allowable and allocable costs is accurate. The signatures/approvals and date stamps may occur electronically, for example, an email confirmation.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.