EIN: 846000729
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: LAUER, SZABO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Oversight agency: 15 [Department of the Interior]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 12, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 12, 2023 (1331 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 9, 2021 — management decision was due March 9, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2020 — management decision was due February 27, 2021.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2019-001 Airport Improvement Program ? CFDA No. 20.106 Grant period ? Year ended December 31, 2019 Significant Deficiency: As discussed at Finding 2019-002, costs submitted for reimbursement are not required to be reviewed to determine whether or not they have been paid for with entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. Because of the failure to require these reviews, there is a possibility that costs could be claimed for reimbursement before being paid. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2019-001 Airport Improvement Program ? CFDA No. 20.106 Grant period ? Year ended December 31, 2019 Significant Deficiency: As discussed at Finding 2019-002, costs submitted for reimbursement are not required to be reviewed to determine whether or not they have been paid for with entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. Because of the failure to require these reviews, there is a possibility that costs could be claimed for reimbursement before being paid. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement.
2019-001 ? Airport Improvement Program ? CFDA No. 20.106 Significant Deficiency Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Action taken: We concur with the recommendation, and it was implemented effective immediately.
When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs mut be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. The entity has not complied with this requirement. Context: A sample of 20 invoices totaling $4,670,592 was selected for audit from a population of 25 invoices totaling $5,089,668. The test found one invoice that was not paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause: Costs submitted for reimbursement are not required to be reviewed to determine whether or not they have been paid for with entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. Effect: $25,838 of costs are questioned as a result of failing to meet cash management requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the auditors? recommendation and the procedures will be implemented to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. The City issued payment on the invoice on May 22, 2020.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2019-002 Airport Improvement Program ? CFDA No. 20.106 Grant period ? Year ended December 31, 2019 Criteria and Condition: When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs mut be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. The entity has not complied with this requirement. Context: A sample of 20 invoices totaling $4,670,592 was selected for audit from a population of 25 invoices totaling $5,089,668. The test found one invoice that was not paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause: Costs submitted for reimbursement are not required to be reviewed to determine whether or not they have been paid for with entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the federal government. Effect: $25,838 of costs are questioned as a result of failing to meet cash management requirements. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the auditors? recommendation and the procedures will be implemented to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. The City issued payment on the invoice on May 22, 2020.
2019-002 ? Airport Improvement Program ? CFDA No. 20.106 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to ensure that costs have been paid prior to being submitted for reimbursement. Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the auditors? recommendation and the procedures will be implemented to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. The City issued payment on the invoice on May 22, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2018 — management decision was due February 16, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2017 — management decision was due March 12, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.