EIN: 840837398
UEI: NNVKE3A6XNX5
Audited by: Kundinger, Corder and Montoya, P.C.
Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (20 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2025 — management decision was due August 7, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2024 — management decision was due August 6, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2023 — management decision was due August 13, 2023.
Uniform Guidance section 200.318 states non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurements. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: We selected one vendor, out of the four which were paid an amount over CEF?s micro-purchase threshold for testing. We noted that the vendor file did not contain documentation that the vendor was not suspended or debarred, nor did it contain documentation regarding the selection process. Effect: Procuring vendors without full and open competition. Context: Vendor file selected for testing of procurement and suspension and debarment did not have proper documentation as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that CEF institute an internal policy that the selection process for all procurements over the organization?s micro-purchase threshold be documented and retained in a vendor file. This should also include documentation to support that a search that was performed on the SAM.gov website to verify that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. CEF should also update its procurement policies to be in compliance with the revised Uniform Guidance, which may allow for CEF to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000 if certain criteria is met.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria and Condition: Uniform Guidance section 200.318 states non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurements. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: We selected one vendor, out of the four which were paid an amount over CEF?s micro-purchase threshold for testing. We noted that the vendor file did not contain documentation that the vendor was not suspended or debarred, nor did it contain documentation regarding the selection process. Effect: Procuring vendors without full and open competition. Context: Vendor file selected for testing of procurement and suspension and debarment did not have proper documentation as required by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that CEF institute an internal policy that the selection process for all procurements over the organization?s micro-purchase threshold be documented and retained in a vendor file. This should also include documentation to support that a search that was performed on the SAM.gov website to verify that the vendor is not suspended or debarred. CEF should also update its procurement policies to be in compliance with the revised Uniform Guidance, which may allow for CEF to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000 if certain criteria is met.
CEF will review their internal processes and procedures in order to ensure appropriate documentation is maintained for purchasing related to federal programs.
FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2022 — management decision was due July 31, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2021 — management decision was due August 4, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2020 — management decision was due July 27, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2019 — management decision was due July 22, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2018 — management decision was due July 29, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2017 — management decision was due July 23, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.