EIN: 840617567
UEI: D73LZHSBX331
Audited by: SORREN CPAS, P.C.
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 6, 2026 (61 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2025 — management decision was due October 11, 2025.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition –The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that two encounters selected where the patients were charged incorrect copays. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 42,422 encounters in the population totaling $13,260,495. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $468. Total discounts in the sample were $22,415. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found was due to inadvertent errors. Effect or Potential Effect – Patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $468. The amount was determined by totaling all the inaccurate discounts received by the two patients. Recommendation – The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding the monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition –The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that two encounters selected where the patients were charged incorrect copays. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 42,422 encounters in the population totaling $13,260,495. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $468. Total discounts in the sample were $22,415. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found was due to inadvertent errors. Effect or Potential Effect – Patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $468. The amount was determined by totaling all the inaccurate discounts received by the two patients. Recommendation – The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding the monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Condition – Peak Vista (“the Organization”) determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that two encounters selected where the patients were charged incorrect copays. Recommendation – The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding the monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed. Anticipated Date of Completion – In progress. Action Taken – We have reviewed the recommendation and have developed a plan for addressing this issue. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan – Ryan Spillane, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action Plan – Ryan Spillane, Chief Financial Officer
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2024 — management decision was due October 23, 2024.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition – The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient’s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 25,539 encounters in the population. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $335. Total discounts in the sample were $13,734. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found related to the encounters whose applications were not retained was due to missing documentation of the application. This activity occurs at the time of service by the reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient’s health record. Effect or Potential Effect – Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. For patients who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount and the patient who received an incorrect co‐pay, patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $335. The amount was determined by totaling all of the discounts received by the two patients, and assumed the two patients without supporting documentation were ineligible for the discount received. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health care services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients’ ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition – The Organization determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient’s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. Context – In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 25,539 encounters in the population. Sliding fee discounts provided to the two encounters totaled $335. Total discounts in the sample were $13,734. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause – Condition found related to the encounters whose applications were not retained was due to missing documentation of the application. This activity occurs at the time of service by the reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient’s health record. Effect or Potential Effect – Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. For patients who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount and the patient who received an incorrect co‐pay, patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs – $335. The amount was determined by totaling all of the discounts received by the two patients, and assumed the two patients without supporting documentation were ineligible for the discount received. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Organization has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Condition – Peak Vista (“the Organization”) determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient’s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. The Organization management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed. Anticipated Date of Completion – In progress. Action Taken – We have reviewed the recommendation and have developed a plan for addressing this issue. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan – Ryan Spillane, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action Plan – Ryan Spillane, Deputy Chief Financial Officer
2022-001
FAC accepted this audit on June 16, 2023 — management decision was due December 16, 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement ? In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients? ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition ? Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient?s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. We found two separate encounters where the patient did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount. We found one separate encounter where the patient was charged an incorrect co-pay. Context ? In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 35,338 encounters in the population. Sliding fee discounts provided to the five encounters totaled $1,461. Total discounts in the sample were $7,283. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause ? Condition found related to the encounters whose applications were not retained was due to missing documentation of the application. This activity occurs at the time of service by the reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient?s health record. Condition found related to the encounters who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount was due to inadvertently recording the patients as sliding fee discount recipients. Condition found related to the encounter who had the incorrect co-pay applied was due to an inadvertent error. Effect or Potential Effect ? Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. For patients who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount and the patient who received an incorrect co-pay, patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs ? $1,461. The amount was determined by totaling all of the discounts received by the four patients, and assumed the two patients without supporting documentation were ineligible for the discount received. Amount also includes the variance between the correct and incorrect co-pay charged to one patient. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement ? In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients? ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition ? Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient?s annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. We found two separate encounters where the patient did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount. We found one separate encounter where the patient was charged an incorrect co-pay. Context ? In testing of sliding fee discounts, we selected 40 encounters with sliding fee discounts applied during the year. There were 35,338 encounters in the population. Sliding fee discounts provided to the five encounters totaled $1,461. Total discounts in the sample were $7,283. The sample procedures were not statistical. The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause ? Condition found related to the encounters whose applications were not retained was due to missing documentation of the application. This activity occurs at the time of service by the reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient?s health record. Condition found related to the encounters who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount was due to inadvertently recording the patients as sliding fee discount recipients. Condition found related to the encounter who had the incorrect co-pay applied was due to an inadvertent error. Effect or Potential Effect ? Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. For patients who did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount and the patient who received an incorrect co-pay, patients received an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs ? $1,461. The amount was determined by totaling all of the discounts received by the four patients, and assumed the two patients without supporting documentation were ineligible for the discount received. Amount also includes the variance between the correct and incorrect co-pay charged to one patient. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Condition - Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient's annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. We found two separate encounters where the patient did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount. We found one separate encounter where the patient was charged an incorrect co-pay. Recommendation - We recommend that Peak Vista's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center's policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed. Anticipated Date of Completion - In progress, estimated completion 12/31/2023. Action Taken - We have reviewed the recommendation and have a corrective procedure in place for addressing this issue. Will continue to monitor improvement. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan - Ryan Spillane, CFO
2021-001
Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Peak Vista is required to submit a Uniform Data System (UDS) Grant Report with the Health Resource and Service Administration (HRSA) with respect to the Health Center Program Cluster grants. Such report includes reporting certain line items such as Physician Clinic visits, Physician Virtual visits, NPs, PAs and CNMs Clinic visits and NPs, PAs and CNMs Virtual visits. Condition ? Peak Vista?s UDS Grant Report contained misstatements of visits for the year ended December 31, 2022. Context ? The remaining key line items as identified by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement were accurately reported for the year ended December 31, 2022. Cause ? Peak Vista inadvertently misstated visits by type and provider. Effect or Potential Effect ? The visits reported to HRSA for the year were misstated. Questioned Costs ? There are no questioned costs. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure accurate reporting. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding the review and reconciliation of supporting information used to complete the UDS Grant Report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. Additionally, the UDS Grant Report has been subsequently re-submitted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Peak Vista is required to submit a Uniform Data System (UDS) Grant Report with the Health Resource and Service Administration (HRSA) with respect to the Health Center Program Cluster grants. Such report includes reporting certain line items such as Physician Clinic visits, Physician Virtual visits, NPs, PAs and CNMs Clinic visits and NPs, PAs and CNMs Virtual visits. Condition ? Peak Vista?s UDS Grant Report contained misstatements of visits for the year ended December 31, 2022. Context ? The remaining key line items as identified by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement were accurately reported for the year ended December 31, 2022. Cause ? Peak Vista inadvertently misstated visits by type and provider. Effect or Potential Effect ? The visits reported to HRSA for the year were misstated. Questioned Costs ? There are no questioned costs. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure accurate reporting. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding the review and reconciliation of supporting information used to complete the UDS Grant Report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. Additionally, the UDS Grant Report has been subsequently re-submitted.
Condition - Peak Vista is required to submit a Uniform Data System (UDS) Grant Report with the Health Resource and Service Administration (HRSA) with respect to the Health Center Program Cluster grants. Such report includes reporting certain line items such as Physician Clinic visits, Physician Virtual visits NPs, PAs and CNMs Clinic visits and NPs, PAs and CNMs Virtual visits. Recommendation - We recommend that Peak Vista's procedures be strengthened to ensure accurate reporting. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding the review and reconciliation of supporting information used to complete the UDS Grant Report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. Additionally, the UDS Grant Report has been subsequently re-submitted. Anticipated Date of Completion - correction completed 06/01/2023 Action Taken - We have reviewed the recommendation and has developed a plan for addressing this issue. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan - Ryan Spillane, CFO
FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2022 — management decision was due March 25, 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement ? In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients? ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition ? Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that five out of the 40 encounters selected were given a sliding fee discount, however a sliding fee application with gross income and household size was not retained. Sliding fee discounts provided to these five encounters totaled $845. There was a total of 53,259 encounters in the population. The sample procedures were not statistical. Context ? The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause ? Condition found was due to missing documentation of the self-attestation form, detailing the patient?s income and family size for eligibility determination. This activity occurs at the time of service by the Reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient?s health record. Effect or Potential Effect ? Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs ? $845 of the $8,045.36 discount amounts sampled. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement ? In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients? ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition ? Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that five out of the 40 encounters selected were given a sliding fee discount, however a sliding fee application with gross income and household size was not retained. Sliding fee discounts provided to these five encounters totaled $845. There was a total of 53,259 encounters in the population. The sample procedures were not statistical. Context ? The audit finding represents a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause ? Condition found was due to missing documentation of the self-attestation form, detailing the patient?s income and family size for eligibility determination. This activity occurs at the time of service by the Reception team and there are times when the paperwork is not scanned into the patient?s health record. Effect or Potential Effect ? Without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income, patients may have been given an improper sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs ? $845 of the $8,045.36 discount amounts sampled. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed.
Condition ? Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discounts, we found that five out of the 40 encounters selected were given a sliding fee discount, however a sliding fee application with gross income and household size was not retained. Sliding fee discounts provided to these five encounters totaled $845. There was a total of 53,259 encounters in the population. The sample procedures were not statistical. Recommendation ? We recommend that Peak Vista?s procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed. Anticipated Date of Completion ? In progress. Action Taken ? We have reviewed the recommendation and has developed a plan for addressing this issue. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan ? Cindy Pratt, Chief Financial Officer
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2022 — management decision was due July 5, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on April 13, 2020 — management decision was due October 13, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2019 — management decision was due October 8, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on April 17, 2018 — management decision was due October 17, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on April 9, 2017 — management decision was due October 9, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
