← Back to home

WASHAKIE COUNTYLocal Government

EIN: 836000129

UEI: UKEKHDR39KH7

Audited by: CARVER FLOREK & JAMES, CPAs

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

WASHAKIE COUNTY6 audit years5 findings1 repeat
6
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$3.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,446,053 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 16, 2026 (12 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,457,149 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2025 — management decision was due September 26, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$1,787,082 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024 — management decision was due September 15, 2024.

2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-002OTHER MATTERS

The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2. Payment (200.305) 3. General procurement standards (200.318) 4. Competition (200.319) 5. Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6. Compensation - personal services (200.430) 7. Compensation - fringe benefits (200.431) 8. Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9. Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement proceduresto ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not syspended, bebarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1. Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2. Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County. 3. Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4. Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards. 5. Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their responsibilities to the federal award. 6. Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-002 - Significant Deficiency - Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Lack of Written Policies and Procedures including Suspension & Debarment and Conflict of Interest Federal Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 21.027 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, "(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity]." A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well-written policies and procedures: 1. Compliance 2. Operational Needs 2. Managing Risks 4. Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical funciton of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County's officials, and are consistent way that meets the County's needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2. Payment (200.305) 3. General procurement standards (200.318) 4. Competition (200.319) 5. Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6. Compensation - personal services (200.430) 7. Compensation - fringe benefits (200.431) 8. Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9. Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement proceduresto ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not syspended, bebarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1. Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2. Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County. 3. Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4. Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards. 5. Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their responsibilities to the federal award. 6. Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-002 Contact Person: Lily Rakness Parra, County Clerk Corrective Action Planned: Washakie County agrees with the finding of 2023-002. Washakie County is currently working on implementing a more thorough tracking procedure in order to document all of the significant processes for our federal awards. Also, in order to further track funds disbursed, a sams.gov account has been set up and is currently utilized in order to determine if an entity is eligible for disbursement of federal funds. An amendment to implement sams.gov utilization will be produced in order to add it to our current Procurement Policy.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-06-30

$949,501 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.

2022-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 10.664 Grant Number: 18-DG-11020000-050 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ? 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, ?(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity].? A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well written policies and procedures: 1.Compliance 2.Operational Needs 3.Managing Risks 4.Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical function of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County?s officials, and are consistent way that meets the County?s needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2.Payment (200.305) 3.General procurement standards (200.318) 4.Competition (200.319) 5.Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6.Compensation ? personal services (200.430) 7.Compensation ? fringe benefits (200.431) 8.Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9.Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1.Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2.Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County 3.Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4.Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards 5.Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their Responsibilities to the federal award. 6.Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-002 Contact Person: Lily Rakness Parra, County Clerk Corrective Action Planned: Washakie County agrees with the finding of 2022-002. A Sams.gov account has been activated in order to verify that entities that are being utilized for County business are not excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. Also, the County is currently drafting a Procurement Policy for Washakie County to utilize for the use of Federal funding as well as in an everyday manor of purchasing and maintenance of county facilities in order to satisfy above finding.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Cause: Questioned Costs: The County requires that contracts over $20,000 to be competitively bid. Expenditures over $5,000 should have written quotes from other vendors. The County has policies on this threshold of expenditures requiring bidding and quotes. The County entered into a contract with a vendor and the contract was over the threshold of $20,000. No competitive bidding was performed prior to the contract awarded to the vendor. The County should follow their policy related to bidding and obtaining competitive quotes to ensure compliance. None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Noncompliance Recommendation: We recommend that the County follow their procurement policy as it relates to obtaining bids and competitive quotes in an effort to ensure compliance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Requirement: Procurement ALN Number: 93.276 Grant Number: 6H79SP080706-01M001 Criteria: Condition: Cause: Questioned Costs: The County requires that contracts over $20,000 to be competitively bid. Expenditures over $5,000 should have written quotes from other vendors. The County has policies on this threshold of expenditures requiring bidding and quotes. The County entered into a contract with a vendor and the contract was over the threshold of $20,000. No competitive bidding was performed prior to the contract awarded to the vendor. The County should follow their policy related to bidding and obtaining competitive quotes to ensure compliance. None Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Noncompliance Recommendation: We recommend that the County follow their procurement policy as it relates to obtaining bids and competitive quotes in an effort to ensure compliance.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-003 Contact Person: Lily Rakness Parra, County Clerk Corrective Action Planned: Washakie County agrees with the finding of 2022-003. As noted above, a Procurement Policy is being drafted which will in turn allow guidance in use of Federal funds for competitive bidding, obtaining quotes etc. in order for The County to satisfy the above finding.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

$2,090,516 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2021 — management decision was due June 9, 2022.

2021-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Criteria: 2 CFR, Part 200, Section 200.430 requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that adequately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition & Cause: The County?s records did not accurately reflect the hours worked and supported by time sheets for employees whose salaries and wages were charged to the Coronavirus Relief Fund grant. Questioned Costs: $35,946 Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: Hours Calculation In connection with our detailed test work, we found payrolls that contained differences between the hours/days marked as quarantine, or COVID related, and what was reimbursed under the grant. Total identified questioned costs associated with this matter for the year ended June 30, 2021 totaled $27,486 and when extrapolated to the entire population the additional likely questioned costs equaled $8,460. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement a review procedure for salaries and wages that are paid for by grant funding to ensure accurate documentation

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR, Part 200, Section 200.430 requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that adequately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition & Cause: The County?s records did not accurately reflect the hours worked and supported by time sheets for employees whose salaries and wages were charged to the Coronavirus Relief Fund grant. Questioned Costs: $35,946 Context for Calculation Of Questioned Costs: Hours Calculation In connection with our detailed test work, we found payrolls that contained differences between the hours/days marked as quarantine, or COVID related, and what was reimbursed under the grant. Total identified questioned costs associated with this matter for the year ended June 30, 2021 totaled $27,486 and when extrapolated to the entire population the additional likely questioned costs equaled $8,460. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement a review procedure for salaries and wages that are paid for by grant funding to ensure accurate documentation

Corrective Action Plan

We agree with this finding and will take steps to ensure that these funds are tracked and reported appropriately.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

$865,629 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2021 — management decision was due July 24, 2021.

2020-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The County did not have written procedures addressing an actual or imminent breach of PII as stated in the contract at the time the forensic imaging equipment was received. Effect: Without these written procedures the PII to be stored on this forensic imaging equipment is at risk and the County is not in compliance with the terms of the award. Recommendation: We recommend that the County draft and adopt the required written procedures to ensure the PII stored on the forensic imaging equipment is properly safeguarded.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: As part of the County?s award for Forensic Imaging, the County agreed to have written procedures in place to respond in the event of an actual or imminent breach. These breach procedures must include a requirement to report actual or imminent breach of personally identifiable information (PII) to an OVW Program Manager no later than 24 hours after an occurrence of an actual breach or the detection of an imminent breach. Condition: The County did not have written procedures addressing an actual or imminent breach of PII as stated in the contract at the time the forensic imaging equipment was received. Effect: Without these written procedures the PII to be stored on this forensic imaging equipment is at risk and the County is not in compliance with the terms of the award. Recommendation: We recommend that the County draft and adopt the required written procedures to ensure the PII stored on the forensic imaging equipment is properly safeguarded.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Planned: The policies will be worked on as the camera becomes available for use but due to the COVID-19 pandemic no training can be conducted at this time so the camera is unusable.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wyoming

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.