← Back to home

GREAT OAKS ACADEMYNon-Profit

EIN: 830401079

UEI: UJ8QTYMUN3F4

Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

GREAT OAKS ACADEMY10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,054,945 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2026 (84 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,482,173 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024 — management decision was due May 1, 2025.

2024-001
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.425U - COVID-19 ESSER Formula Fund III Grants to Local Education Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 213713 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The Academy applies the simplified method to determine indirect costs for the ESSER program. The allocation of indirect costs and the computation of an indirect cost rate may be accomplished through simplified allocation procedures described in 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix VII, paragraph C.2. The indirect cost rate is approved by the Michigan Department of Education. Condition - The Academy did not accurately apply the approved indirect cost rate for the program at the time drawdown requests were submitted creating a cash management issue involving unallowable cost reimbursements. Questioned Costs - $60,672 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not Applicable Context - Proper segregation of duties and review functions are critical key internal control functions to detect errors prior to requesting a grant reimbursement. The indirect cost allocation for the ESSER program included an error in the indirect cost rate applied causing draw downs on unallowable costs. Management identified the error after the draw occurred and reduced the indirect costs charged to the ESSER program by $60,672 prior to year end to correct the error. A deferred revenue balance is reported for the program at June 30, 2024. This deferred balance is attributed to the excess reimbursement request and reduction of indirect costs for the accurate rate after the drawdown was completed. Cause and Effect - The Academy calculated indirect costs using an inaccurate rate, then submitted and received reimbursement requests for overstated indirect costs. Recommendation - We recommend that prior to drawdowns occurring, a review of the indirect cost calculations occur to detect errors in the indirect cost rates applied to prevent noncompliance in cash management. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of enhancing procedures to prevent overdrawn amounts in the future.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.425U - COVID-19 ESSER Formula Fund III Grants to Local Education Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 213713 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - The Academy applies the simplified method to determine indirect costs for the ESSER program. The allocation of indirect costs and the computation of an indirect cost rate may be accomplished through simplified allocation procedures described in 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix VII, paragraph C.2. The indirect cost rate is approved by the Michigan Department of Education. Condition - The Academy did not accurately apply the approved indirect cost rate for the program at the time drawdown requests were submitted creating a cash management issue involving unallowable cost reimbursements. Questioned Costs - $60,672 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not Applicable Context - Proper segregation of duties and review functions are critical key internal control functions to detect errors prior to requesting a grant reimbursement. The indirect cost allocation for the ESSER program included an error in the indirect cost rate applied causing draw downs on unallowable costs. Management identified the error after the draw occurred and reduced the indirect costs charged to the ESSER program by $60,672 prior to year end to correct the error. A deferred revenue balance is reported for the program at June 30, 2024. This deferred balance is attributed to the excess reimbursement request and reduction of indirect costs for the accurate rate after the drawdown was completed. Cause and Effect - The Academy calculated indirect costs using an inaccurate rate, then submitted and received reimbursement requests for overstated indirect costs. Recommendation - We recommend that prior to drawdowns occurring, a review of the indirect cost calculations occur to detect errors in the indirect cost rates applied to prevent noncompliance in cash management. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of enhancing procedures to prevent overdrawn amounts in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number: 2024-001 Condition: The Academy did not accurately apply the approved indirect cost rate for the program at the time drawdown requests were submitted creating a cash management issue involving unallowable cost reimbursements. Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Management identified the error after the draw down occurred and reduced the indirect costs and is in the process of enhancing procedures to prevent overdrawn amounts in the future. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Rebecca Joyner Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024

About Cash Management →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,447,380 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,667,818 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,105,712 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2021 — management decision was due May 28, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,008,950 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2021 — management decision was due July 6, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,028,193 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$958,728 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2019 — management decision was due July 7, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$937,547 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2017 — management decision was due May 15, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$942,638 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.