EIN: 826003449
UEI: PM27HW6REBL6
Audited by: DZA PLLC
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 17, 2026 (47 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2025 — management decision was due September 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.
Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response Award Numbers HC319700 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X ] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 3, Compliance Requirement A, Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Compliance Requirement B, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, requires the cost to be spent on budgeted allowable costs within the grant document. Our testing of the September 30, 2023, costs noted a retention bonus not allowed in grant budget and grant expenditures in amounts different than the approved amounts in the grant documents. Condition The retention bonus was given under the condition that the employee will have to pay back the bonus if the employee decides to part ways with Franklin within the time period stated in the contract. This period was greater than the period of availability for the funds under the grant agreement. This condition is not allowable under federal regulations. Context This finding appears to be isolated. Cause The Hospital’s internal controls over compliance were not adequate to prevent or detect errors in how grant funds were spent and cost charged to the federal award. Effect The federal award funds were spent on non-allowable costs. Questioned Costs Questioned cost for retention bonus is $275,585. Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement procedures to ensure federal awards are expended based on budgets outlined in the grant documents and the Federal cost principles are followed during the expenditure of federal awards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action The Hospital acted only under the express authority and permission of the granting body who pre-approved this activity. The Hospital reasonably took that approval as a signature of a compliant activity. Despite the finding on grounds of activity dates, the activities were none the less aligned to the purposes and aims of the funding opportunity, and no intent to operate outside of compliance was present. For federal grants going forward, the Hospital will utilize a CPA experienced in federal awards to review our proposal activities for ongoing compliance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response Award Numbers HC319700 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X ] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 3, Compliance Requirement A, Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Compliance Requirement B, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, requires the cost to be spent on budgeted allowable costs within the grant document. Our testing of the September 30, 2023, costs noted a retention bonus not allowed in grant budget and grant expenditures in amounts different than the approved amounts in the grant documents. Condition The retention bonus was given under the condition that the employee will have to pay back the bonus if the employee decides to part ways with Franklin within the time period stated in the contract. This period was greater than the period of availability for the funds under the grant agreement. This condition is not allowable under federal regulations. Context This finding appears to be isolated. Cause The Hospital’s internal controls over compliance were not adequate to prevent or detect errors in how grant funds were spent and cost charged to the federal award. Effect The federal award funds were spent on non-allowable costs. Questioned Costs Questioned cost for retention bonus is $275,585. Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement procedures to ensure federal awards are expended based on budgets outlined in the grant documents and the Federal cost principles are followed during the expenditure of federal awards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action The Hospital acted only under the express authority and permission of the granting body who pre-approved this activity. The Hospital reasonably took that approval as a signature of a compliant activity. Despite the finding on grounds of activity dates, the activities were none the less aligned to the purposes and aims of the funding opportunity, and no intent to operate outside of compliance was present. For federal grants going forward, the Hospital will utilize a CPA experienced in federal awards to review our proposal activities for ongoing compliance.
Corrective action planned: Utilize a CPA experienced with federal award to review and ensure compliance with grant proposals and activities. Anticipated completion date: April 30, 2024 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jalen Tollefson, Grant Director
Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response Award Numbers HC319700 Criteria [ ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 7, Compliance Requirement I, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, requires the Hospital to review vendors to the debarment and suspension listing Condition The Hospital does not have procedures to compare vendors to the debarment and suspension listing before procuring goods or services. Context This finding appears to be isolated. Cause The Hospital’s internal controls over compliance were not adequate to prevent or detect errors in the selection of debarred or suspended vendors. Effect There is a risk federal funds may be expended out of conformity with federal regulations and compliance requirements. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement procedures to ensure grant money is not given to vendors on the debarment and suspension listing. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action A procedure and policy will be drafted and implemented this fiscal year.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response Award Numbers HC319700 Criteria [ ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ X] Material Weakness Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F, Compliance Supplement, Part 7, Compliance Requirement I, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, requires the Hospital to review vendors to the debarment and suspension listing Condition The Hospital does not have procedures to compare vendors to the debarment and suspension listing before procuring goods or services. Context This finding appears to be isolated. Cause The Hospital’s internal controls over compliance were not adequate to prevent or detect errors in the selection of debarred or suspended vendors. Effect There is a risk federal funds may be expended out of conformity with federal regulations and compliance requirements. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement procedures to ensure grant money is not given to vendors on the debarment and suspension listing. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action A procedure and policy will be drafted and implemented this fiscal year.
Corrective action planned: A procedure and policy will be drafted and implemented this fiscal year. Anticipated completion date: May 31, 2024 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jalen Tollefson, Grant Director
FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2023 — management decision was due September 9, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2021 — management decision was due December 28, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Idaho →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.