← Back to home

IDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 91Local Government

EIN: 826001158

UEI: UKVMYDXWEQE7

Audited by: QUEST CPAS PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

IDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 9110 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$9.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$9,787,322 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 19, 2026 (72 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$12,139,711 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2024 — management decision was due May 11, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,669,618 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2023 — management decision was due June 1, 2024.

2023-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The initial information provided for the audit was unreconciled and contained overspending in several grant funds that could not be requested due to grant limitations. Many funds included in the SEFA had to be adjusted, some by material amounts to bring expenditures down to requestable levels, and during the process, it was noted that at least one fund carried an accounts receivable balance which had not been requested. Layered in that balance was at least three years’ worth of unrequested funds causing District staff to have to work with the state to shift expenditures into the appropriate grant years to recover all amounts owed and spent by the District. Context: As part of our review of the SEFA, and during our testing over accounts receivable and revenues, Wipfli found that grant requests were often done once or twice a year rather than monthly, and amounts requested did not line up with accounts receivable as shown in the financial statements. Although there was no evidence of unallowable expenditures being charged to the funds, the fact that funds were over-expended and in excess of budget suggests that the budget is not driving expenditures and regular reconciliation and review is not happening. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The District staff and auditors had to spend additional time reviewing historical information and adjusting the classification of expenditures, often to the general fund, to keep grant funds in line with available grant amounts. This resulted in significant adjustments to the general fund for expenditures that were not likely budgeted in the current year. Cause: The District was not reconciling federal spending with available funding, requests for reimbursement were not timely, and the internal controls over review and spending do not appear to be functioning adequately. See also finding 2023-002. Repeat: No Auditor's Recommendation: Wipfli recommends continued training and timely requests for reimbursement for all applicable federal funds. In addition, regular review of budget and actual, district needs, and changes since the budget was set are integral to having an awareness of the funds and potential issues before they arise. By resetting the procedures of the District and completing these tasks, the reporting of the District will improve, and forward planning and preparation will improve. View of Responsible Official: The District will strive for monthly requests for reimbursement for all applicable federal funds, thus creating awareness of the funds and potential issues before they arise.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-003 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Preparation Federal Program Information: Funding agency: All Title: All CFDA number: All Award year and number: 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Section 200.510(b)), the auditee should identify all federal awards received and prepare a SEFA for the period under audit. The information contained in the SEFA shall be derived from, and relate directly to, the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. Expenditures should include only those which are both allowable and within the grant award. Grant reimbursement requests should be done monthly. Condition: The initial information provided for the audit was unreconciled and contained overspending in several grant funds that could not be requested due to grant limitations. Many funds included in the SEFA had to be adjusted, some by material amounts to bring expenditures down to requestable levels, and during the process, it was noted that at least one fund carried an accounts receivable balance which had not been requested. Layered in that balance was at least three years’ worth of unrequested funds causing District staff to have to work with the state to shift expenditures into the appropriate grant years to recover all amounts owed and spent by the District. Context: As part of our review of the SEFA, and during our testing over accounts receivable and revenues, Wipfli found that grant requests were often done once or twice a year rather than monthly, and amounts requested did not line up with accounts receivable as shown in the financial statements. Although there was no evidence of unallowable expenditures being charged to the funds, the fact that funds were over-expended and in excess of budget suggests that the budget is not driving expenditures and regular reconciliation and review is not happening. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The District staff and auditors had to spend additional time reviewing historical information and adjusting the classification of expenditures, often to the general fund, to keep grant funds in line with available grant amounts. This resulted in significant adjustments to the general fund for expenditures that were not likely budgeted in the current year. Cause: The District was not reconciling federal spending with available funding, requests for reimbursement were not timely, and the internal controls over review and spending do not appear to be functioning adequately. See also finding 2023-002. Repeat: No Auditor's Recommendation: Wipfli recommends continued training and timely requests for reimbursement for all applicable federal funds. In addition, regular review of budget and actual, district needs, and changes since the budget was set are integral to having an awareness of the funds and potential issues before they arise. By resetting the procedures of the District and completing these tasks, the reporting of the District will improve, and forward planning and preparation will improve. View of Responsible Official: The District will strive for monthly requests for reimbursement for all applicable federal funds, thus creating awareness of the funds and potential issues before they arise.

Corrective Action Plan

Response to Finding 2023-003 - Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Preparation The district will strive for monthly requests for reimbursement for all applicable federal funds, thus creating awareness of the funds and potential issues before they arise. The District Director of Finance will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of these responses and anticipates corrective dates to be immediate. Person(s) responsible for action: Lanell Farmer/Director of Finance

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,154,685 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2022 — management decision was due May 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,235,084 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2022 — management decision was due December 12, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,405,714 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 4, 2020 — management decision was due May 4, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,506,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2019 — management decision was due April 21, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,729,773 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2018 — management decision was due May 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,490,499 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,173,628 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2016 — management decision was due May 7, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.