EIN: 823991844
UEI: K4U1Z32JUDS5
Audited by: Sutton Frost Cary LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2026 (109 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
In its 2025 Compliance Report, auditors made the following finding: Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. In response, Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation commits to the following Corrective Action Plan: Remedy: In order to remedy this violation, staff will take immediate action to file missing semiannual reports in cooperation with general contractor. Responsibility for Implementing Remedy: Reports will be filed by Anne Hagan, VP of Strategic Initiatives. Verification of Remedy: Reports will be reviewed by April Allen, President and CEO, and filing of reports will also be confirmed by April Allen, President and CEO Deadline for Remedy: As soon as possible but no later than 7/31/26. Consequences in the event remedy is not undertaken: Failure to file reports could result in request for reimbursement of grant revenue. Training to Prevent future violations: Reporting requirements and grant agreements will be reviewed by Anne Hagan. Statement on Consequences of Repeated Violations: If future reports are late or missed, already reimbursed grant payments may have to be repaid and SGPGF may not be eligible for future grant payments.
During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
In its 2025 Compliance Report, auditors made the following finding: Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. In response, Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation commits to the following Corrective Action Plan: Remedy: In order to remedy this violation, staff will take immediate action to file missing semiannual reports in cooperation with general contractor. Responsibility for Implementing Remedy: Reports will be filed by Anne Hagan, VP of Strategic Initiatives. Verification of Remedy: Reports will be reviewed by April Allen, President and CEO, and filing of reports will also be confirmed by April Allen, President and CEO Deadline for Remedy: As soon as possible but no later than 7/31/26. Consequences in the event remedy is not undertaken: Failure to file reports could result in request for reimbursement of grant revenue. Training to Prevent future violations: Reporting requirements and grant agreements will be reviewed by Anne Hagan. Statement on Consequences of Repeated Violations: If future reports are late or missed, already reimbursed grant payments may have to be repaid and SGPGF may not be eligible for future grant payments.
FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2026 — management decision was due January 17, 2027.
During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
In its 2025 Compliance Report, auditors made the following finding: Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. In response, Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation commits to the following Corrective Action Plan: Remedy: In order to remedy this violation, staff will take immediate action to file missing semiannual reports in cooperation with general contractor. Responsibility for Implementing Remedy: Reports will be filed by Anne Hagan, VP of Strategic Initiatives. Verification of Remedy: Reports will be reviewed by April Allen, President and CEO, and filing of reports will also be confirmed by April Allen, President and CEO Deadline for Remedy: As soon as possible but no later than 7/31/26. Consequences in the event remedy is not undertaken: Failure to file reports could result in request for reimbursement of grant revenue. Training to Prevent future violations: Reporting requirements and grant agreements will be reviewed by Anne Hagan. Statement on Consequences of Repeated Violations: If future reports are late or missed, already reimbursed grant payments may have to be repaid and SGPGF may not be eligible for future grant payments.
During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. Management’s Response: See corrective action plan
In its 2025 Compliance Report, auditors made the following finding: Finding 2025‐001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance finding. Criteria: Under this grant program, the Foundation is required to complete semi‐annual performance reports in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Condition: During reporting testing, it was noted that the Foundation had not completed or submitted the required performance reports during the year. Cause: The Foundation didn’t implement an effective control for ensuring the required reporting under the grant was completed and submitted timely. Effect: Internal control was not properly designed to identify the required reporting and prevent noncompliance, and the Foundation was not in compliance with the reporting requirement. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement internal controls over the reporting process that ensures the required reporting is submitted in a timely manner. In addition, the Foundation should ensure grant agreements are reviewed in detail so no required reporting is overlooked. In response, Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation commits to the following Corrective Action Plan: Remedy: In order to remedy this violation, staff will take immediate action to file missing semiannual reports in cooperation with general contractor. Responsibility for Implementing Remedy: Reports will be filed by Anne Hagan, VP of Strategic Initiatives. Verification of Remedy: Reports will be reviewed by April Allen, President and CEO, and filing of reports will also be confirmed by April Allen, President and CEO Deadline for Remedy: As soon as possible but no later than 7/31/26. Consequences in the event remedy is not undertaken: Failure to file reports could result in request for reimbursement of grant revenue. Training to Prevent future violations: Reporting requirements and grant agreements will be reviewed by Anne Hagan. Statement on Consequences of Repeated Violations: If future reports are late or missed, already reimbursed grant payments may have to be repaid and SGPGF may not be eligible for future grant payments.
FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2025 — management decision was due November 5, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026 — management decision was due December 30, 2026.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
