← Back to home

219 Health Network, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 822299994

UEI: MMG8UZ1ABXF3

Audited by: Forvis, LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

219 Health Network, Inc.1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$989.1K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$989,125 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 23, 2024 (863 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

The Organization entered to various professional services contracts for marketing, advertising and information dissemination that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and are considered micro-purchase awards, but did not maintain appropriate documentation to document the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history to support its procurement decisions. Contracts entered into also do not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, vendor contracts over the micro-purchase threshold did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection (documentation of the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history). Also, related to the vendor payments, noted that vendor contracts do not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Micro-purchases were made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the required provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization does not have a comprehensive procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance requirements. Adequate supporting documentation on the procurements were not obtained or maintained within vendor files and vendor contracts do not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions. We also recommend the Organization perform a comprehensive review of its procurement policy and ensure that it is in compliance and in-line with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will develop a policy and checklist to maintain written documentation of vendor selection and procurement process, along with the review and approval process required under the Uniform Guidance requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on the Federal Program Federal Program Name: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Affordable Care Act (ACA) Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program, 93.527 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii)), micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. Also, the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (Appendix II to Part 200), require that Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Condition: The Organization entered to various professional services contracts for marketing, advertising and information dissemination that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and are considered micro-purchase awards, but did not maintain appropriate documentation to document the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history to support its procurement decisions. Contracts entered into also do not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, vendor contracts over the micro-purchase threshold did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection (documentation of the price reasonableness based on research, experience, and purchase history). Also, related to the vendor payments, noted that vendor contracts do not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Micro-purchases were made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the required provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization does not have a comprehensive procurement policy that is in line with Uniform Guidance requirements. Adequate supporting documentation on the procurements were not obtained or maintained within vendor files and vendor contracts do not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions. We also recommend the Organization perform a comprehensive review of its procurement policy and ensure that it is in compliance and in-line with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will develop a policy and checklist to maintain written documentation of vendor selection and procurement process, along with the review and approval process required under the Uniform Guidance requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

219 Health Network will develop a policy and checklist to maintain written documentation of vendor selection and procurement process, along with the review and approval process required under the Uniform Guidance requirements.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Indiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.