HEART BUTTE SCHOOL DISTRICT #1Local Government

EIN: 816000759

UEI: XXXXXXXXXXXX

Audited by: DENNING, DOWNEY AND ASSOCIATES CPA'S

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

HEART BUTTE SCHOOL DISTRICT #17 audit years5 findings
7
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,967,995 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 27, 2023 (976 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2021-06-30

$5,122,188 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2022 — management decision was due December 27, 2022.

2021-010
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

The District did not maintain and provide the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) report submitted to the Montana Governor's Office for compliance testing. Context: During our testing of the CRF program, we requested the reports filed with the Montana Governor's Office. Criteria: Internal control procedures should be in place to ensure all required reports for grant funding are maintained and available for audit. Effect: We were unable to audit the required CRF reports for internal control review and compliance with program requirements. Cause: An inadequate system of internal control noted with regards to the maintenance of documentation related to report compliance. Recommendation: The District should establish an internal control procedure to ensure all reports submitted for grant funding are maintained and available.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-010 Coronavirus Relief Fund Reporting Compliance CFDA Number: Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Award Number: 21.019 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Montana Governor's Office Condition: The District did not maintain and provide the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) report submitted to the Montana Governor's Office for compliance testing. Context: During our testing of the CRF program, we requested the reports filed with the Montana Governor's Office. Criteria: Internal control procedures should be in place to ensure all required reports for grant funding are maintained and available for audit. Effect: We were unable to audit the required CRF reports for internal control review and compliance with program requirements. Cause: An inadequate system of internal control noted with regards to the maintenance of documentation related to report compliance. Recommendation: The District should establish an internal control procedure to ensure all reports submitted for grant funding are maintained and available.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2021-010: Coronavirus Relief Fund Reporting Compliance Response: The District shall establish internal controls to ensure all Grant filing and paperwork are maintained properly.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,111,396 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2021 — management decision was due December 29, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,875,583 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

2019-007
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Material Weakness over internal controls in federal program expenditure processing. The District is not in compliance with federal program requirements to obtain and retain proper supporting documentation of program expenditures. Proper expenditure documentation was missing on expenditures for three federal programs in excess of $25,000 and for four federal programs under $25,000. While the Impact Aid fund is able to be spent on any District expenditure, we were unable to determine whether the costs were actual District expenditures, and whether the coding reported was accurate due to missing supporting documentation. Context: Warrants were paid for federal expenditures of $90,726 in the Miscellaneous Fund and $33,710 in the Impact Aid fund totaling $124,436 without proper documentation of the expenditure to allow verification of whether the expenditure was for actual District purposes and whether the coding was accurately reported. Expenditures missing proper documentation by federal program as illustrated below: Miscellaneous Fund: Amount Title 1- Part A $ 7,102 School Improvement Grant SIG 32,306 Title VII (Indian Education) 29,836 Gear-Up 5,205 Title I - Part A (School Support) 12,420 Title IV- Part B (21st Century) 3,857 Subtotal Miscellaneous Fund $90,726 Impact Aid Fund $33,710 Total Federal Program Questioned Coding $124,436 Possible Effect: Expenditures may be reported in wrong functions in the audit report. Cause: The District did not properly assess its risks in expenditure processing. Proper checks and balances were not implemented to prevent this situation from occurring. There was an overall sense that it is not anyone?s job to chase the staff members down to obtain expenditure documentation. Recommendation: We recommend that the District enforce a policy that requires each staff member to turn in all receipts and invoices and that the District Clerk assure that all claims include proper documentation prior to presenting warrants to the Board for approval.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING NUMBER 2019-007 ? FEDERAL PROGRAM QUESTIONED COSTS/CODING: Federal Award Name: CFDA# Amount Award Number Year School Improvement Grant SIG 84.377A $32,306 03712268219 2019 Title VII (Indian Education) 84.060 29,836 S060A180383 2019 Impact Aid 84.041 33,710 S041B-2019-2878 2019 Criteria: The Office of Management & Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance requires adequate documentation for each federal program. Questioned costs are costs that at the time of the audit are not supported by adequate documentation for the auditor to determine whether the expenditure was proper for the grant, properly coded and properly reported. The District?s expenditure policy requires that proper documentation of expenditures be present prior to issuing warrants. Condition: Material Weakness over internal controls in federal program expenditure processing. The District is not in compliance with federal program requirements to obtain and retain proper supporting documentation of program expenditures. Proper expenditure documentation was missing on expenditures for three federal programs in excess of $25,000 and for four federal programs under $25,000. While the Impact Aid fund is able to be spent on any District expenditure, we were unable to determine whether the costs were actual District expenditures, and whether the coding reported was accurate due to missing supporting documentation. Context: Warrants were paid for federal expenditures of $90,726 in the Miscellaneous Fund and $33,710 in the Impact Aid fund totaling $124,436 without proper documentation of the expenditure to allow verification of whether the expenditure was for actual District purposes and whether the coding was accurately reported. Expenditures missing proper documentation by federal program as illustrated below: Miscellaneous Fund: Amount Title 1- Part A $ 7,102 School Improvement Grant SIG 32,306 Title VII (Indian Education) 29,836 Gear-Up 5,205 Title I - Part A (School Support) 12,420 Title IV- Part B (21st Century) 3,857 Subtotal Miscellaneous Fund $90,726 Impact Aid Fund $33,710 Total Federal Program Questioned Coding $124,436 Possible Effect: Expenditures may be reported in wrong functions in the audit report. Cause: The District did not properly assess its risks in expenditure processing. Proper checks and balances were not implemented to prevent this situation from occurring. There was an overall sense that it is not anyone?s job to chase the staff members down to obtain expenditure documentation. Recommendation: We recommend that the District enforce a policy that requires each staff member to turn in all receipts and invoices and that the District Clerk assure that all claims include proper documentation prior to presenting warrants to the Board for approval.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan: The District shall create and enforce policies and procedures that require each staff member to turn in all receipts and invoices to the District Clerk to assure that claims include all proper documentation. Actions have taken place immediately and by the end of the fiscal year, the District will fully execute and be in alignment the corrective action plan.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,894,580 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2019 — management decision was due September 3, 2019.

2018-006
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-007
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,410,762 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2018 — management decision was due September 19, 2018.

2017-006
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$1,710,238 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2017 — management decision was due August 27, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.