EIN: 813941213
UEI: JGYVD6FNQEU3
Audited by: Hirsch | Dinter & Co. CPAs
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 6, 2027 (126 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2025 — management decision was due December 1, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2025 — management decision was due August 12, 2025.
The modified total direct cost base used to calculate indirect costs included food costs. Food costs are considered a distorting item and should have been excluded from the base calculation. Criteria: Section 200.403 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations lists several criteria that must be met for costs to be allowable under federal awards. One criterion is the requirement for consistency in treating costs as direct or indirect. A cost cannot be assigned as a direct cost if other costs incurred in similar circumstances, for the same purpose, are assigned as indirect costs. Effect: Including food costs in the base calculation for indirect costs results in an overstatement of indirect costs. Thus, the indirect costs charged to the nonprofit food service is too high. Cause: Distorting costs were included when calculating the indirect cost base. Recommendation: The Organization will use the correct modified total direct cost base to calculate indirect costs. Congregation Masores Hachinuch, Inc. DBA Bas Mikroh will restore the excess funds to its nonprofit food service account. Amount of Questioned Cost: $599,140 Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization submitted a payment plan and is reimbursing its nonprofit food service for the excess indirect costs charged. The Organization does not agree that the indirect costs were improperly calculated. The requirement to omit food costs in the modified total direct cost base is being disputed by other Organizations. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2033
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The modified total direct cost base used to calculate indirect costs included food costs. Food costs are considered a distorting item and should have been excluded from the base calculation. Criteria: Section 200.403 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations lists several criteria that must be met for costs to be allowable under federal awards. One criterion is the requirement for consistency in treating costs as direct or indirect. A cost cannot be assigned as a direct cost if other costs incurred in similar circumstances, for the same purpose, are assigned as indirect costs. Effect: Including food costs in the base calculation for indirect costs results in an overstatement of indirect costs. Thus, the indirect costs charged to the nonprofit food service is too high. Cause: Distorting costs were included when calculating the indirect cost base. Recommendation: The Organization will use the correct modified total direct cost base to calculate indirect costs. Congregation Masores Hachinuch, Inc. DBA Bas Mikroh will restore the excess funds to its nonprofit food service account. Amount of Questioned Cost: $599,140 Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization submitted a payment plan and is reimbursing its nonprofit food service for the excess indirect costs charged. The Organization does not agree that the indirect costs were improperly calculated. The requirement to omit food costs in the modified total direct cost base is being disputed by other Organizations. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2033
Recommendation: The Organization will use the correct modified total direct cost base to calculate indirect costs. Congregation Masores Hachinuch, Inc. DBA Bas Mikroh will restore the excess funds to its nonprofit food service account. Action Taken: As per an approved payment plan, Congregation Masores Hachinuch, Inc. DBA Bas Mikroh is restoring the full amount specified above to its nonprofit food service account. We have implemented the above-mentioned recommendation regarding calculation of indirect costs to ensure that only proper indirect costs are included in the base calculation of indirect costs. We have designated Rabbi Shaul Rosengarten, administrator, to implement and monitor the plan of corrective action for this finding. Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2033
The Organization does not have a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Criteria: Section 200.318(c)(1) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that non-federal entities must maintain written standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions in cases of violations of standards by officers, employees, and agents. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the requirement to have a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations of standards. Cause: The Organization’s written code for conduct does not include the disciplinary actions for violations of standards. Recommendation: The Organization will develop a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Amount of Questioned Cost: N/A Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization agrees with the finding and updated the written code of conduct to include disciplinary actions, in the area of acceptance of gratuities, for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Completion Date: August 31, 2022
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Organization does not have a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Criteria: Section 200.318(c)(1) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that non-federal entities must maintain written standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions in cases of violations of standards by officers, employees, and agents. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the requirement to have a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations of standards. Cause: The Organization’s written code for conduct does not include the disciplinary actions for violations of standards. Recommendation: The Organization will develop a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Amount of Questioned Cost: N/A Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization agrees with the finding and updated the written code of conduct to include disciplinary actions, in the area of acceptance of gratuities, for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Completion Date: August 31, 2022
Recommendation: The Organization will develop a written code of conduct that provides disciplinary actions for violations by officers, employees, or agents. Action Taken: The SFA has updated the written code of conduct to include disciplinary actions, in the area of acceptance of gratuities, for violations by officers, employees, or agents. The SFA will ensure that the written code of conduct is followed. We have designated Rabbi Shaul Rosengarten, administrator, to implement and monitor the plan of corrective action for this finding. Completion Date: 08/31/2022
The Organization did not maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. The Organization did not ensure that vendors complied with all contract terms, conditions, and specifications. Criteria: Section 200.318(i) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that entities must maintain detailed records showing the history of procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Section 200.318(b) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that entities must ensure that suppliers are following the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the requirements to have detailed records of the procurement history and to ensure that their vendors and suppliers follow the terms of their contracts. Cause: Detailed records of procurement history were not kept by the Organization. The Organization did not follow through with ensuring that contract terms, conditions, and specifications were followed by suppliers. Recommendation: The Organization will ensure that detailed documentation is kept for every procurement and that every product/service is properly procured according to all regulations and requirements. The Organization will monitor vendor compliance with terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Amount of Questioned Cost: N/A Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization agrees with the finding and has executed a plan to ensure sufficient record keeping of the procurement process. Completion Date: August 31, 2022
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The Organization did not maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement. The Organization did not ensure that vendors complied with all contract terms, conditions, and specifications. Criteria: Section 200.318(i) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that entities must maintain detailed records showing the history of procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Section 200.318(b) of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that entities must ensure that suppliers are following the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the requirements to have detailed records of the procurement history and to ensure that their vendors and suppliers follow the terms of their contracts. Cause: Detailed records of procurement history were not kept by the Organization. The Organization did not follow through with ensuring that contract terms, conditions, and specifications were followed by suppliers. Recommendation: The Organization will ensure that detailed documentation is kept for every procurement and that every product/service is properly procured according to all regulations and requirements. The Organization will monitor vendor compliance with terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Amount of Questioned Cost: N/A Auditor’s Summary of Auditee’s Comments: The Organization agrees with the finding and has executed a plan to ensure sufficient record keeping of the procurement process. Completion Date: August 31, 2022
Recommendation: The Organization will ensure that detailed documentation is kept for every procurement and that every product/service is properly procured according to all regulations and requirements. The Organization will monitor vendor compliance with terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts. Action Taken: We have put a process in place, ensuring that records are sufficiently maintained to detail each step we take with the procurement process. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, solicitation documents/specifications, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. These records, along with all other procurement documentation, will be retained on file for three years plus the current year. We have designated Rabbi Shaul Rosengarten, administrator, to implement and monitor the plan of corrective action for this finding. Completion Date: 08/31/2022
FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2023 — management decision was due November 30, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2022 — management decision was due December 1, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on May 27, 2021 — management decision was due November 27, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.