EIN: 812847693
UEI: G5RDP1CNJMW4
Audited by: PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (73 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 97.036, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 752894 and 752895; 2025 Pass through Entity - Michigan State Police (MSP) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - According to 2 CFR § 200.403(f), which outlines factors affecting the allowability of costs under federal awards, costs must not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. This provision is intended to prevent duplication of federal funding and ensure that each program bears only its fair share of costs. Condition - Costs charged to ALN 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance were also charged to ALN 84.425 - Education Stabilization Fund (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief - ESSER) in prior fiscal years, indicating potential duplication of expenditures across federal programs. Questioned Costs - $70,015,657 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A - questioned costs were determinable. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Questioned costs represent all of the expenditures reported on the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2025. Refer to the Context section below for additional details. Context -In April 2022, FEMA issued an advisory regarding its funding support for the in-person operation of schools and school districts. The advisory clarified that schools and districts could utilize ESSER funds under ALN 84.425, administered by the U.S. Department of Education, to cover upfront costs for health and safety measures. These costs could later be submitted for reimbursement through FEMA’s Public Assistance program. However, the advisory emphasized that once FEMA reimbursement is received, the district must return the corresponding amount to the ESSER grant. The School District was awarded two grants under ALN 97.036 in December 2024 and January 2025. These grants were used to cover costs associated with COVID-19 diagnostic and screening testing. The ESSER grant period concluded on September 30, 2024. On October 16, 2025, the School District received reimbursement from MSP. Cause and Effect - The obligation dates for the FEMA awards occurred after the end of the ESSER grant period under ALN 84.425. Although FEMA’s advisory permitted districts to use ESSER funds for eligible upfront costs, the School District was unable to reimburse the ESSER grant prior to the expiration of its period of availability. As a result, approximately $70 million in expenditures are considered questioned costs. Recommendation - Because the obligation dates for the FEMA awards occurred after the conclusion of the ESSER grant period, we recommend that the School District coordinate with the Michigan Department of Education as the pass-through entity for ESSER funding and the Michigan State Police as the pass-through entity for FEMA funding. This collaboration is essential to address the timing misalignment, which prevented reimbursement to the ESSER grant prior to its period of availability. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The School District applied for reimbursement of potentially eligible COVID-19 expenditures in 2022. Per an April 5, 2022 FEMA memo, "FEMA Continues Funding to Support the Safe Operations of Schools," school districts could apply for reimbursement for ESSER-funded expenditures and then, upon approval of application, shift the funds to general fund. “Schools and school districts may utilize FEMA Public Assistance to receive full reimbursement for costs for the purposes above. Schools and districts may also use Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funding from the U.S. Department of Education as a way to provide the up-front cost for the above health and safety measures, and later seek reimbursement through the FEMA Public Assistance process. For example, a local education agency (LEA) may use ESSER funds for costs that may ultimately be covered by FEMA; however, once it receives funds from FEMA for those costs, it must reimburse the ESSER grant account.” FEMA provided district award notification for COVID-19 testing in December 2024 and January 2025. By this time, the ESSER grant had closed on September 30, 2024 and the final expenditure reports for ESSER had been submitted to MDE in November 2024. Therefore, the School District could not complete the allowable general fund swaps. The School District notified Michigan Department of Education and Michigan State Police of the timing issue. Upon request from Michigan State Police, the School District provided documentation that general funds were available to conduct the swaps if the FEMA approval had been received in a timely manner.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 97.036, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 752894 and 752895; 2025 Pass through Entity - Michigan State Police (MSP) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - According to 2 CFR § 200.403(f), which outlines factors affecting the allowability of costs under federal awards, costs must not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. This provision is intended to prevent duplication of federal funding and ensure that each program bears only its fair share of costs. Condition - Costs charged to ALN 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance were also charged to ALN 84.425 - Education Stabilization Fund (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief - ESSER) in prior fiscal years, indicating potential duplication of expenditures across federal programs. Questioned Costs - $70,015,657 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A - questioned costs were determinable. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Questioned costs represent all of the expenditures reported on the SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2025. Refer to the Context section below for additional details. Context -In April 2022, FEMA issued an advisory regarding its funding support for the in-person operation of schools and school districts. The advisory clarified that schools and districts could utilize ESSER funds under ALN 84.425, administered by the U.S. Department of Education, to cover upfront costs for health and safety measures. These costs could later be submitted for reimbursement through FEMA’s Public Assistance program. However, the advisory emphasized that once FEMA reimbursement is received, the district must return the corresponding amount to the ESSER grant. The School District was awarded two grants under ALN 97.036 in December 2024 and January 2025. These grants were used to cover costs associated with COVID-19 diagnostic and screening testing. The ESSER grant period concluded on September 30, 2024. On October 16, 2025, the School District received reimbursement from MSP. Cause and Effect - The obligation dates for the FEMA awards occurred after the end of the ESSER grant period under ALN 84.425. Although FEMA’s advisory permitted districts to use ESSER funds for eligible upfront costs, the School District was unable to reimburse the ESSER grant prior to the expiration of its period of availability. As a result, approximately $70 million in expenditures are considered questioned costs. Recommendation - Because the obligation dates for the FEMA awards occurred after the conclusion of the ESSER grant period, we recommend that the School District coordinate with the Michigan Department of Education as the pass-through entity for ESSER funding and the Michigan State Police as the pass-through entity for FEMA funding. This collaboration is essential to address the timing misalignment, which prevented reimbursement to the ESSER grant prior to its period of availability. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The School District applied for reimbursement of potentially eligible COVID-19 expenditures in 2022. Per an April 5, 2022 FEMA memo, "FEMA Continues Funding to Support the Safe Operations of Schools," school districts could apply for reimbursement for ESSER-funded expenditures and then, upon approval of application, shift the funds to general fund. “Schools and school districts may utilize FEMA Public Assistance to receive full reimbursement for costs for the purposes above. Schools and districts may also use Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funding from the U.S. Department of Education as a way to provide the up-front cost for the above health and safety measures, and later seek reimbursement through the FEMA Public Assistance process. For example, a local education agency (LEA) may use ESSER funds for costs that may ultimately be covered by FEMA; however, once it receives funds from FEMA for those costs, it must reimburse the ESSER grant account.” FEMA provided district award notification for COVID-19 testing in December 2024 and January 2025. By this time, the ESSER grant had closed on September 30, 2024 and the final expenditure reports for ESSER had been submitted to MDE in November 2024. Therefore, the School District could not complete the allowable general fund swaps. The School District notified Michigan Department of Education and Michigan State Police of the timing issue. Upon request from Michigan State Police, the School District provided documentation that general funds were available to conduct the swaps if the FEMA approval had been received in a timely manner.
Condition: Costs charged to ALN 97.036 – Disaster Grants: Public Assistance were also charged to ALN 84.425 - Education Stabilization Fund (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief - "ESSER") in prior fiscal years, indicating potential duplication of expenditures across federal programs. Planned Corrective Action: The District applied for reimbursement of potentially eligible COVID expenditures in 2022. Per an April 5, 2022 FEMA memo “FEMA Continues Funding to Support the Safe Operations of Schools”, school districts could apply for reimbursement for ESSER funded expenditures, and then upon approval of application shift the funds to general fund. “Schools and school districts may utilize FEMA Public Assistance to receive full reimbursement for costs for the purposes above. Schools and districts may also use Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funding from the U.S. Department of Education as a way to provide the up-front cost for the above health and safety measures, and later seek reimbursement through the FEMA Public Assistance process. For example, a local education agency (LEA) may use ESSER funds for costs that may ultimately be covered by FEMA; however, once it receives funds from FEMA for those costs, it must reimburse the ESSER grant account.” FEMA provided District award notification for COVID testing in December 2024 and January 2025, by this time the ESSER grant had closed on September 30, 2024 and the final expenditure reports for ESSER had been submitted to MDE in November 2024. Therefore the District could not complete the allowable general fund swaps. The District notified Michigan Department of Education and Michigan State Police of the timing issue. Upon request from MI State Police, the District provided documentation that available general funds were available to conduct the swaps if the FEMA approval had been received in a timely manner. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jeremy Vidito, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: Requested documentation was submitted to Michigan State Police on November 7, 2025
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.424, U.S. Department of Education, Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 250750; 2025 Pass through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR § 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, duplicative costs charged to the grant. Questioned Costs - None If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Within a sample of 40 special pay home visit payroll transactions, there was one transaction identified that consisted of duplicative costs where the same payroll costs were charged to the grant twice. The School District determined that duplicative costs were submitted for pay during a time of staffing transition in the department that is responsible for tracking home visits. The costs were submitted to payroll by the former employee responsible for tracking the time, as well as submitted by the new employee within that role. Special pay for home visits does not follow the standard payroll procedures; instead, it is processed and approved manually. The costs submitted did go through a manual review process prior to being charged to the grant, but the review in place did not operate effectively to identify the duplicative costs. The School Districted identified a total of five transactions in total that amounted to $3,023 in duplicative costs. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent or detect and correct duplicative costs charged to the program. As a result, the School District received reimbursement in excess of the actual amount spent on the grant and the initial SEFA provided to the auditors was overstated by $3,023. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended June, 30, 2025 was corrected. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review the controls in place to ensure that the review control is at a sufficient level to address the risk of duplicative expenses being charged to the grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The School District annually processes thousands of supplemental payments for home visits. The audit found only five individual payments were duplicated. The duplication was caused by human error during an internal staff transition within the Family and Community Engagement (FACE) department. This led the new manager to incorrectly report employee home visit logs twice. The FACE team will add internal controls during staff transitions to ensure documentation is not duplicated.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.424, U.S. Department of Education, Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 250750; 2025 Pass through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR § 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, duplicative costs charged to the grant. Questioned Costs - None If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Within a sample of 40 special pay home visit payroll transactions, there was one transaction identified that consisted of duplicative costs where the same payroll costs were charged to the grant twice. The School District determined that duplicative costs were submitted for pay during a time of staffing transition in the department that is responsible for tracking home visits. The costs were submitted to payroll by the former employee responsible for tracking the time, as well as submitted by the new employee within that role. Special pay for home visits does not follow the standard payroll procedures; instead, it is processed and approved manually. The costs submitted did go through a manual review process prior to being charged to the grant, but the review in place did not operate effectively to identify the duplicative costs. The School Districted identified a total of five transactions in total that amounted to $3,023 in duplicative costs. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent or detect and correct duplicative costs charged to the program. As a result, the School District received reimbursement in excess of the actual amount spent on the grant and the initial SEFA provided to the auditors was overstated by $3,023. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended June, 30, 2025 was corrected. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review the controls in place to ensure that the review control is at a sufficient level to address the risk of duplicative expenses being charged to the grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The School District annually processes thousands of supplemental payments for home visits. The audit found only five individual payments were duplicated. The duplication was caused by human error during an internal staff transition within the Family and Community Engagement (FACE) department. This led the new manager to incorrectly report employee home visit logs twice. The FACE team will add internal controls during staff transitions to ensure documentation is not duplicated.
Condition: The School District's controls did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, duplicative costs charged to the grant. Planned Corrective Action: The District annually processes thousands of supplemental payments for Home Visits. The audit found only 5 individual payments were duplicated. The duplication was caused by human error during an internal staff transition within the Family and Community Engagement (FACE) department. This led the new manager to incorrectly report employee home visit logs twice. The FACE team will add internal controls during staff transitions to ensure documentation is not duplicated. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jeremy Vidito, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: January 1, 2026
FAC accepted this audit on November 22, 2024 — management decision was due May 22, 2025.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID-19 - Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2024 Pass through Entity - Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.300(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented. Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, costs charged to the grant in excess of the related invoices. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A - Refer to context below. Context - In a sample of 13 non payroll related transactions, we identified 3 transactions where the costs charged to the grant exceeded the related invoices. The School District used a manual allocation process through a manual journal entry to charge expenses to the grant that resulted in the grant being charged $48,447 in excess of the supporting invoices. As of June 30, 2024, the School District had not yet requested reimbursement for the excess costs charged; the request was made and payment was received subsequent to year end. Upon identification of the error, the School District posted a manual journal entry to remove the duplicate costs of $48,447 from the grant fund and reduced the SEFA by this amount for the year ended June 30, 2024. The School District followed the guidance of the pass through entity provided subsequent to year end. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, an instance of noncompliance. The controls in place to verify that the manual adjusting journal entry was complete and accurate were not effective. As a result, the initial SEFA provided to the auditors was overstated by $48,447. The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024 was corrected. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review its processes and controls to ensure the preparation and review of journal entries to charge costs to grant funds include a review for duplicate expenses. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Grant Accounting team will develop a standard operating procedure on review and approval of journal entries. The Grant Account Team will provide training to Grant Compliance staff members on the defined process. Grant Compliance Senior Director and Assistant Director will be responsible for ensuring journal requests are submitted following the outlined operating procedure. Grant Accounting staff members will review submitted materials to ensure no invoice is overcharged and then process journal request.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID-19 - Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2024 Pass through Entity - Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.300(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented. Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, costs charged to the grant in excess of the related invoices. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A - Refer to context below. Context - In a sample of 13 non payroll related transactions, we identified 3 transactions where the costs charged to the grant exceeded the related invoices. The School District used a manual allocation process through a manual journal entry to charge expenses to the grant that resulted in the grant being charged $48,447 in excess of the supporting invoices. As of June 30, 2024, the School District had not yet requested reimbursement for the excess costs charged; the request was made and payment was received subsequent to year end. Upon identification of the error, the School District posted a manual journal entry to remove the duplicate costs of $48,447 from the grant fund and reduced the SEFA by this amount for the year ended June 30, 2024. The School District followed the guidance of the pass through entity provided subsequent to year end. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent, or detect and correct in a timely manner, an instance of noncompliance. The controls in place to verify that the manual adjusting journal entry was complete and accurate were not effective. As a result, the initial SEFA provided to the auditors was overstated by $48,447. The SEFA for the year ended June 30, 2024 was corrected. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review its processes and controls to ensure the preparation and review of journal entries to charge costs to grant funds include a review for duplicate expenses. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Grant Accounting team will develop a standard operating procedure on review and approval of journal entries. The Grant Account Team will provide training to Grant Compliance staff members on the defined process. Grant Compliance Senior Director and Assistant Director will be responsible for ensuring journal requests are submitted following the outlined operating procedure. Grant Accounting staff members will review submitted materials to ensure no invoice is overcharged and then process journal request.
Condition: The School District's controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, costs charged to the grant that were more than the related invoices. Planned Corrective Action: The Grant Accounting team will develop a standard operating procedure on review and approval of journal entries. The Grant Account Team will provide training to Grant Compliance staff members on the defined process. Grant Compliance Senior Director and Assistant Director will be responsible for ensuring journal requests are submitted following the outlined operating procedure. Grant Accounting staff members will review submitted materials to ensure no invoice is overcharged and then process journal request. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jeremy Vidito, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 3/1/2025
FAC accepted this audit on February 29, 2024 — management decision was due August 29, 2024.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.027, U.S. Department of Education, Special Education Cluster 84.425U, U.S. Department of Education, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2023 IDEA Flowthrough 22/23 (Special Education Cluster) 213713 - 2122 (Education Stabilization Fund) Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect work performed. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with the statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, an employee's time being charged to the Special Education Cluster that did not have adequate documentation. Additionally, the School District's internal controls did not detect and correct, in a timely manner, updates to an employee status upon termination for employees charged to the Special Education Cluster and the Education Stabilization Fund. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A - No questioned costs reported. Context - In a sample of 40, we identified that one employee, who was terminated, was inappropriately charged to the Special Education Cluster. The detective controls of the School District identified that the employee lacked appropriate documentation for the time charged and paid, and, thus, the School District requested repayment from the employee. However, the School District's internal controls did not notify the grants department of the overpayment to address the improper charge. In conjunction with tailored procedures to address an identified risk of overpayment for federal grants, one out of seven employees improperly received a payment subsequent to their termination date, which was charged to the Education Stabilization Fund. Based on review of the final payroll audit performed by the School District, there was no overpayment of grant funds. However, we noted that the controls were not operating timely. In this instance, the employee was terminated in March 2023, a final payroll audit was conducted in August 2023, subsequent to the School District's fiscal year, and final payout was not yet disbursed as of the testing date. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, an instance of noncompliance. The controls in place to notify the grants department of an employee overpayment were not effective. Furthermore, the controls in place to update a change in an employee's status, from active to terminated, did not occur timely. The lack of timely controls may result in inappropriate charges to the grant, inappropriate request for reimbursement, repayment of funds to the funder, and the inability to recoup improper payments from the employee. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review its procedures and controls to ensure terminated employees statuses are updated timely within the system. We further recommend that the grants department receive notification of the final payroll audit results to assess what action, if any, is necessary to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The School District concurs with the audit finding. The District has worked to strengthen internal controls to eliminate errors. The District will review its internal controls and provide additional training to staff. The School District is in the process of filling a Project Manager role on the Payroll Team who will be responsible for reviewing employee terminations and identifying potential overpayments. Until the role is filled, the Senior Director of Payroll and CFO will review employee exits quarterly to identify any potential overpayments and move funds to the general fund. New procedures for employee exit were rolled out in July in an effort to improve timely exiting of employees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.027, U.S. Department of Education, Special Education Cluster 84.425U, U.S. Department of Education, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 2023 IDEA Flowthrough 22/23 (Special Education Cluster) 213713 - 2122 (Education Stabilization Fund) Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Education Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect work performed. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with the statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. Condition - The School District's controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, an employee's time being charged to the Special Education Cluster that did not have adequate documentation. Additionally, the School District's internal controls did not detect and correct, in a timely manner, updates to an employee status upon termination for employees charged to the Special Education Cluster and the Education Stabilization Fund. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A - No questioned costs reported. Context - In a sample of 40, we identified that one employee, who was terminated, was inappropriately charged to the Special Education Cluster. The detective controls of the School District identified that the employee lacked appropriate documentation for the time charged and paid, and, thus, the School District requested repayment from the employee. However, the School District's internal controls did not notify the grants department of the overpayment to address the improper charge. In conjunction with tailored procedures to address an identified risk of overpayment for federal grants, one out of seven employees improperly received a payment subsequent to their termination date, which was charged to the Education Stabilization Fund. Based on review of the final payroll audit performed by the School District, there was no overpayment of grant funds. However, we noted that the controls were not operating timely. In this instance, the employee was terminated in March 2023, a final payroll audit was conducted in August 2023, subsequent to the School District's fiscal year, and final payout was not yet disbursed as of the testing date. Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, an instance of noncompliance. The controls in place to notify the grants department of an employee overpayment were not effective. Furthermore, the controls in place to update a change in an employee's status, from active to terminated, did not occur timely. The lack of timely controls may result in inappropriate charges to the grant, inappropriate request for reimbursement, repayment of funds to the funder, and the inability to recoup improper payments from the employee. Recommendation - We recommend that the School District review its procedures and controls to ensure terminated employees statuses are updated timely within the system. We further recommend that the grants department receive notification of the final payroll audit results to assess what action, if any, is necessary to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The School District concurs with the audit finding. The District has worked to strengthen internal controls to eliminate errors. The District will review its internal controls and provide additional training to staff. The School District is in the process of filling a Project Manager role on the Payroll Team who will be responsible for reviewing employee terminations and identifying potential overpayments. Until the role is filled, the Senior Director of Payroll and CFO will review employee exits quarterly to identify any potential overpayments and move funds to the general fund. New procedures for employee exit were rolled out in July in an effort to improve timely exiting of employees.
Condition: The School District’s controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, an employee’s time being charged to the Special Education Cluster that did not have adequate documentation. Additionally, the School District’s controls did not prevent or detect and correct, in a timely manner, updates to an employee status upon termination for employees charged to the Special Education Cluster and the Education Stabilization Fund. Planned Corrective Action: The School District concurs with the audit finding. The District has worked to strengthen internal controls to eliminate errors. The District will review its internal controls and provide additional training to staff. The School District is in the process of filling a Project Manager role on the Payroll Team who will be responsible for reviewing employee terminations and identifying potential overpayments. Until the role is filled, the Senior Director of Payroll and CFO will review employee exits quarterly to identify any potential overpayments and move funds to the general fund. New procedures for employee exit were rolled out in July in an effort to improve timely exiting of employees. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jeremy Vidito, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024
FAC accepted this audit on November 10, 2022 — management decision was due May 10, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2021 — management decision was due May 2, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2020 — management decision was due May 11, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2019 — management decision was due July 23, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-004
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-014
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-010
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-012
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-013
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.