EIN: 812680851
UEI: LNHJMU2BVEM1
Audit also covers 2 related EINs: 824967849, 853240367 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: Sikich CPA LLC
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 2, 2026 (180 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2024 — management decision was due March 19, 2025.
During our testing of federal expenditures, we noted payroll expenses related to construction management fees were allocated and billed to the federal grant based on the Organization’s budgeted time allocations determined at the beginning of the year with no reconciliation to actual time allocations during 2023. We consider this instance to be a significant deficiency over compliance relating to allowable costs and the cost principles. Criteria: Expenditures charged to the federal grant must follow the cost principles outlined in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E including “Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.” Cause: Internal billings were not updated for actual 2023 payroll allocations and management did not perform reconciliation of budgeted allocations to actual time incurred. Effect: As a result of the deficiency noted, the federal grant could be charged in excess of actual expenditures necessary and reasonable to run the programs. Recommendation: We recommend management review their calculations of payroll allocations for the federal grant on a periodic basis to ensure the amounts being billed to the federal grant are reasonable and in line with actual costs incurred.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency: Payroll Allocation True Up Related to Construction Management Fees Condition: During our testing of federal expenditures, we noted payroll expenses related to construction management fees were allocated and billed to the federal grant based on the Organization’s budgeted time allocations determined at the beginning of the year with no reconciliation to actual time allocations during 2023. We consider this instance to be a significant deficiency over compliance relating to allowable costs and the cost principles. Criteria: Expenditures charged to the federal grant must follow the cost principles outlined in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E including “Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.” Cause: Internal billings were not updated for actual 2023 payroll allocations and management did not perform reconciliation of budgeted allocations to actual time incurred. Effect: As a result of the deficiency noted, the federal grant could be charged in excess of actual expenditures necessary and reasonable to run the programs. Recommendation: We recommend management review their calculations of payroll allocations for the federal grant on a periodic basis to ensure the amounts being billed to the federal grant are reasonable and in line with actual costs incurred.
Payroll allocation budgets used to develop construction management fees charged to allowable federal programs will be reviewed semi-annually to adjust for any differences between budgeted and actual costs. This review will be documented, and any adjustments will be made to the applicable federal programs.
During our review of controls over expenditures of federal awards, we noted that the program managers review the billing reports, including supporting documentation (vendor invoices) for allowability under the grant agreements and the Uniform Guidance; however, support of their review of the expenditures reported on the SEFA that are unbilled at year-end is not maintained by the Organization. Criteria: The Organization’s internal control system should be properly designed to ensure that allowable costs charged to grants are receiving the appropriate level of oversight and review. Cause: The Organization’s internal control policies require approval of all invoices prior to payment; however, support for these approvals was not maintained by the Organization outside of the program manager’s approval at the time of billing. Effect: Out of a sample of 37 expenditures, we noted 6 did not have support of the required approval by the program manager. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Our testing did not identify any questioned costs as a result of this deficiency in control. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a process to ensure that documentation on the approval of expenditures be maintained and that the review by the program manager occurs in a timely manner, not just at the time the expenditures are billed to the grantors.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Significant Deficiency: Maintain Documentation on Approval of Invoices Related to Federal Expenditures Condition: During our review of controls over expenditures of federal awards, we noted that the program managers review the billing reports, including supporting documentation (vendor invoices) for allowability under the grant agreements and the Uniform Guidance; however, support of their review of the expenditures reported on the SEFA that are unbilled at year-end is not maintained by the Organization. Criteria: The Organization’s internal control system should be properly designed to ensure that allowable costs charged to grants are receiving the appropriate level of oversight and review. Cause: The Organization’s internal control policies require approval of all invoices prior to payment; however, support for these approvals was not maintained by the Organization outside of the program manager’s approval at the time of billing. Effect: Out of a sample of 37 expenditures, we noted 6 did not have support of the required approval by the program manager. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Our testing did not identify any questioned costs as a result of this deficiency in control. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a process to ensure that documentation on the approval of expenditures be maintained and that the review by the program manager occurs in a timely manner, not just at the time the expenditures are billed to the grantors.
Invoices and receipts submitted by the Housing Team to the Business Manager will include the grant name to avoid any confusion as to the proper allocation to the federal funding source.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.