EIN: 810650329
UEI: PMHARB4UNHJ4
Audited by: MENGEL METZGER BARR & CO. LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 16, 2026 (49 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2024 — management decision was due May 18, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2023 — management decision was due July 26, 2023.
During our audit procedures, we reviewed the grant schedules prepared by the outsourced financial consulting firm and noted they did not properly reconcile to the grant activity as recorded. Consequently, we proposed significant adjustments to properly record the grant activity. We consider this to be a material weakness in internal control over compliance in the area of allowable costs/cost principles. Cause: During the 2022 fiscal year, the outsourced financial consulting firm did not identify expenditures of federal funds on a timely or consistent basis throughout the year, resulting in significant effort to properly identify and reflect allowable expenditures of federal funds at year-end. Effect or Potential Effect: If expenditures of federal funds are not properly tracked throughout the year, management may not fully utilize grant funds during the grant period or may improperly identify unallowable costs as federal expenditures under the applicable grants. This could result in disallowance of grant expenditures. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The outsourced financial consulting firm estimated amounts of federal grant expenditures throughout the year but did not have a process in place to reconcile the estimated amounts to the specific expenditures. As a result, the outsourced financial consulting firm went through multiple iterations of preparing the federal expenditure details. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization transfer the day-to-day finance operations to the expanded internal finance team to reduce reliance on the outsourced financial consulting firm. This will allow the Organization to devote the necessary resources to managing the finance and accounting function, including tracking of expenditures of federal funds, on a more accurate and timely basis. Federal grant revenues and expenditures should be reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure charges are in accordance with GAAP, adequately documented, and allocable to the federal award. Views of responsible officials: Public Prep agrees with the audit finding and acknowledges our responsibility for the design, implementation and reviews of internal controls related to financial reporting on Federal awards.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Requirements per section 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance state that costs charged to federal awards must be determined in accordance with GAAP, be adequately documented, and be allocable to the federal award, and be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our audit procedures, we reviewed the grant schedules prepared by the outsourced financial consulting firm and noted they did not properly reconcile to the grant activity as recorded. Consequently, we proposed significant adjustments to properly record the grant activity. We consider this to be a material weakness in internal control over compliance in the area of allowable costs/cost principles. Cause: During the 2022 fiscal year, the outsourced financial consulting firm did not identify expenditures of federal funds on a timely or consistent basis throughout the year, resulting in significant effort to properly identify and reflect allowable expenditures of federal funds at year-end. Effect or Potential Effect: If expenditures of federal funds are not properly tracked throughout the year, management may not fully utilize grant funds during the grant period or may improperly identify unallowable costs as federal expenditures under the applicable grants. This could result in disallowance of grant expenditures. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The outsourced financial consulting firm estimated amounts of federal grant expenditures throughout the year but did not have a process in place to reconcile the estimated amounts to the specific expenditures. As a result, the outsourced financial consulting firm went through multiple iterations of preparing the federal expenditure details. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization transfer the day-to-day finance operations to the expanded internal finance team to reduce reliance on the outsourced financial consulting firm. This will allow the Organization to devote the necessary resources to managing the finance and accounting function, including tracking of expenditures of federal funds, on a more accurate and timely basis. Federal grant revenues and expenditures should be reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure charges are in accordance with GAAP, adequately documented, and allocable to the federal award. Views of responsible officials: Public Prep agrees with the audit finding and acknowledges our responsibility for the design, implementation and reviews of internal controls related to financial reporting on Federal awards.
Public Prep agrees with the audit finding and acknowledges our responsibility for the design, implementation and reviews of internal controls related to financial reporting on Federal awards, the internal finance team will: 1. Assign several accountants who understands the reporting/ invoicing/ and accounting components required for Federal awards. 2. On a monthly basis, the accountants will tag all the allowable, allocable, and appropriate expenses to each of the various federal awards. 3. The accountants will provide Grant Status reports to the schools to report on all expenses expended against the grant funds, to ensure the funds are used appropriately for their intended use. 4. The accountants will have a cost allocation plan to monitor all the expenses being allocated to all the grants funds.
FAC accepted this audit on November 23, 2021 — management decision was due May 23, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on November 10, 2020 — management decision was due May 10, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2019 — management decision was due May 11, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.