EIN: 810533986
UEI: C45QN5JHELW7
Audited by: BAKER MEINZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 30, 2026 (121 days ago).
What is a management decision? →One of the tenant files tested did not contain a copy of the tenant's signed application. Criteria: All tenant files should contain a copy of the tenant's signed application. Effect: There is no financial effect. Context: A sample of tenant files was selected to ensure compliance with HUD regulations. The test found that one of the files tested was not in compliance. The non compliance did not have a financial effect. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 37, Dollars - N/A; Sample - 4, Dollars - N/A; Not in Compliance - 1, Dollars - N/A; Questioned Costs - None; Cause: Project management failed to obtain the tenant's signature on the initial application. Recommendation: Project management should be reminded that obtaining proper documentation during the move-in process is important in tenant management. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Project management will be reminded to obtain the proper documentation during the move-in process. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - None; Non-compliance code - R
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: One of the tenant files tested did not contain a copy of the tenant's signed application. Criteria: All tenant files should contain a copy of the tenant's signed application. Effect: There is no financial effect. Context: A sample of tenant files was selected to ensure compliance with HUD regulations. The test found that one of the files tested was not in compliance. The non compliance did not have a financial effect. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 37, Dollars - N/A; Sample - 4, Dollars - N/A; Not in Compliance - 1, Dollars - N/A; Questioned Costs - None; Cause: Project management failed to obtain the tenant's signature on the initial application. Recommendation: Project management should be reminded that obtaining proper documentation during the move-in process is important in tenant management. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Project management will be reminded to obtain the proper documentation during the move-in process. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - None; Non-compliance code - R
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: One of the tenant files tested did not contain a copy of the tenant's signed application. Recommendation: Project management should be reminded that obtaining proper documentation during the move-in process is important in tenant management. Action taken: The Project agrees with the finding. Project management will be reminded to obtain the proper documentation during the move-in process.
The Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Criteria: The Project should not pay the expense of another project. Effect: The amount of expense incorrectly paid was $559. Context: The Accounts Receivable - Operations account was tested at June 30, 2025. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $559; Cause: the Project mistakenly paid an invoice of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to ensure it pays the correct amount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $559; Non-compliance code - R
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-002: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: The Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Criteria: The Project should not pay the expense of another project. Effect: The amount of expense incorrectly paid was $559. Context: The Accounts Receivable - Operations account was tested at June 30, 2025. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $559; Cause: the Project mistakenly paid an invoice of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to ensure it pays the correct amount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $559; Non-compliance code - R
FINDING 2025-002: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: The Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to make sure it pays the correct amount. Action taken: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. The finding was corrected in July 2025. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding these plans, please call Ling Han at 651-645-7271.
FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2024 — management decision was due June 11, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2023 — management decision was due August 28, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2021 — management decision was due June 14, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2020 — management decision was due June 20, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2019 — management decision was due May 18, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2018 — management decision was due May 28, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2018 — management decision was due July 30, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2017 — management decision was due September 14, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
