← Back to home

W-A-Y ACADEMYNon-Profit

EIN: 800816678

UEI: ZPXAHN84UJ46

Audited by: ALAN C. YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

W-A-Y ACADEMY4 audit years3 findings
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$918.5K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$918,452 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 1, 2025 (494 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$918,984 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2023 — management decision was due June 13, 2024.

2023-004
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Criteria – Grant drawdowns should be based on actual costs incurred and must be properly documented. Condition and Description – During our procedures we noted the Academy had $78,155 in drawdowns for the Title I grant, but only $4,906 could be supported. The Academy had $1,191 in drawdowns for Title II that could not be supported. Questioned Costs - $73,349 – Title I $ 1,916 – Title II

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria – Grant drawdowns should be based on actual costs incurred and must be properly documented. Condition and Description – During our procedures we noted the Academy had $78,155 in drawdowns for the Title I grant, but only $4,906 could be supported. The Academy had $1,191 in drawdowns for Title II that could not be supported. Questioned Costs - $73,349 – Title I $ 1,916 – Title II

Corrective Action Plan

Management believes that the previous Director of Finance drew down the funds in error. Going forward, a record of all funds drawn will be maintained and will include documentation to support the amount of the drawdown.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

$901,548 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2022 — management decision was due May 1, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$899,806 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 3, 2021 — management decision was due May 3, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2021-003 ? Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ? Disbursements Finding Type. Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires the Academy to support disbursements charged to federal cost objectives with adequate documentation in accordance with the Academy's purchasing policies, which require approved purchase orders and invoices. These purchase orders should be properly reviewed and approved. Condition. Eighteen of the twenty seven disbursements selected for testing did not include the required purchase order and other documentation of approvals by the appropriate, authorizing individual. Cause. While the Academy has procedures in place to cover thse areas, due to staff turnover, the small size of its accounting staff, and limited resources, the Academy did not adequately follow through on documenting and retaining evidence of approvals for disbursements as is their policy. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that disbursements of federal awards could be made for unallowable costs. Questioned Costs. No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the Academy review its written policies and procedures over federal awards to ensure that all disbursements have the appropriate documentation and evidence of review and approval prior to payment.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-003 ? Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ? Disbursements Finding Type. Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires the Academy to support disbursements charged to federal cost objectives with adequate documentation in accordance with the Academy's purchasing policies, which require approved purchase orders and invoices. These purchase orders should be properly reviewed and approved. Condition. Eighteen of the twenty seven disbursements selected for testing did not include the required purchase order and other documentation of approvals by the appropriate, authorizing individual. Cause. While the Academy has procedures in place to cover thse areas, due to staff turnover, the small size of its accounting staff, and limited resources, the Academy did not adequately follow through on documenting and retaining evidence of approvals for disbursements as is their policy. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that disbursements of federal awards could be made for unallowable costs. Questioned Costs. No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the Academy review its written policies and procedures over federal awards to ensure that all disbursements have the appropriate documentation and evidence of review and approval prior to payment.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal program(s): U.S. Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Auditor Description of Condition and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires the Academy to support disbursements charged to federal cost objectives with adequate documentation in accordance with the Academy's purchasing policies, which require approved purchase orders and invoices. These purchase orders should be properly reviewed and approved. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that disbursements of federal awards could be made for unallowable costs. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the Academy review its written policies and procedures over federal awards to ensure that all disbursements have the appropriate documentation and evidence of review and approval prior to payment. Corrective Action: The Academy will develop the appropriate policies under Uniform Guidance and ensure that these policies are being followed. Responsible Person: Kerry Sitar (Finance Director) Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-004
Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2021-004 ? Written Policies Required by the Uniform Grant Guidance Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (?200.302(6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (?200.318) 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (?200.302(7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (?200.430 and ?200.431); and 5)Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (?200.474). Condition. Although the Academy has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs, compensation, and travel costs in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause. This condition is a result of the Academy?s limited resources, and the small size of its accounting staff. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that grant requirements under 2 CFR 200 would not be followed. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the Academy develop and implement the required policies as soon as practical.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-004 ? Written Policies Required by the Uniform Grant Guidance Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance; Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Federal program(s) U.S. Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Criteria. The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (?200.302(6)); 2) Procurement (including bidding and a conflict of interest policy) (?200.318) 3) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (?200.302(7)); 4) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (?200.430 and ?200.431); and 5)Travel costs (including mileage and per diem) (?200.474). Condition. Although the Academy has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs, compensation, and travel costs in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause. This condition is a result of the Academy?s limited resources, and the small size of its accounting staff. Effect. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that grant requirements under 2 CFR 200 would not be followed. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the Academy develop and implement the required policies as soon as practical.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal program(s): U.S. Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA# 84.425); Passed through MDE; All project numbers Auditor Description of Condition and Effect: Although the Academy has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, procurement, allowability of costs, compensation, and travel costs in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. As a result of this condition, the Academy was exposed to increased risk that grant requirements under 2 CFR 200 would not be followed. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the Academy develop and implement the required policies as soon as practical. Corrective Action: A written policy will be developed and implemented to meet the requirements under Federal guidance. Responsible Person: Kerry Sitar (Finance Director) Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.