← Back to home

AFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONSNon-Profit

EIN: 800345712

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: ABDO LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

AFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS1 audit years5 findings
1
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2020)

FY 2020-12-31

$2,928,263 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 5, 2022 (1493 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-003
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During our audit, we noted a significant number of errors on the SEFA related to calculations of federal expenditures. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires proper reporting of federal expenditures. Cause: Management did not track the information needed to properly prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Effect: Federal expenditures under two CFDA numbers and three federal awards were excluded from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, resulting in expenditures being materially understated. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization track the necessary information during the year and implement a review process to ensure correct reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards prior to the audit.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: During our audit, we noted a significant number of errors on the SEFA related to calculations of federal expenditures. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires proper reporting of federal expenditures. Cause: Management did not track the information needed to properly prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Effect: Federal expenditures under two CFDA numbers and three federal awards were excluded from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, resulting in expenditures being materially understated. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization track the necessary information during the year and implement a review process to ensure correct reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards prior to the audit.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-003 ? Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization track the necessary information during the year and implement a review process to ensure correct reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards prior to the audit. Planned Action: AEDS took steps to hire accountant to make sure there is segregation of duties. We are in the process of hiring for this position. The one we hire left the position and now we posted the job again.

About Other →
2020-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

There were several transactions that could not be traced from the reported expenditures to the bank activity. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that reported expenditures agree to the actual expenditures. Cause: A sufficient record trail was not kept to ensure and support that amounts requested from Federal funds through the State were disbursed to the appropriate recipients. Effect: Grants payments totaling $90,000 were received from the State of Minnesota but could not be located being disbursed from the bank to the grant recipients. Recommendation: Sufficient records should be kept to accurately track receipts of funds and the subsequent disbursements to recipients to ensure that all funds are properly disbursed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: There were several transactions that could not be traced from the reported expenditures to the bank activity. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that reported expenditures agree to the actual expenditures. Cause: A sufficient record trail was not kept to ensure and support that amounts requested from Federal funds through the State were disbursed to the appropriate recipients. Effect: Grants payments totaling $90,000 were received from the State of Minnesota but could not be located being disbursed from the bank to the grant recipients. Recommendation: Sufficient records should be kept to accurately track receipts of funds and the subsequent disbursements to recipients to ensure that all funds are properly disbursed.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-004 ? Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: Sufficient records should be kept to accurately track receipts of funds and the subsequent disbursements to recipients to ensure that all funds are properly disbursed. Planned Action: We collected all the record, but due to pandemic the documents were saved on drop box and difficult to trace. Moving forward, all the documents will be save hard copy at our office and electronically.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Several grants could not be matched to supporting authorization of payments to grantees. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that recipients establish and maintain internal controls to prevent and detect unallowable expenditures. Cause: The Organization could not substantiate that the controls around maintaining documentation for disbursements were effective. Controls around disbursement approval and the related documentation were not maintained appropriately to comply with control requirements. Effect: Payments may have been made that would not have been approved. Recommendation: We recommend that controls be set up and documented to ensure that payments of funds are not made without approval. In addition, we recommend that documentation of approved disbursements be kept in records for a reasonable time from 5-7 years.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Several grants could not be matched to supporting authorization of payments to grantees. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that recipients establish and maintain internal controls to prevent and detect unallowable expenditures. Cause: The Organization could not substantiate that the controls around maintaining documentation for disbursements were effective. Controls around disbursement approval and the related documentation were not maintained appropriately to comply with control requirements. Effect: Payments may have been made that would not have been approved. Recommendation: We recommend that controls be set up and documented to ensure that payments of funds are not made without approval. In addition, we recommend that documentation of approved disbursements be kept in records for a reasonable time from 5-7 years.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend that controls be set up and documented to ensure that payments of funds are not made without approval. In addition, we recommend that documentation of approved disbursements be kept in records for a reasonable time from 5-7 years. Planned Action: All the payments were paid with appropriate signatures, but difficulty in tracing the transition during the pandemic and the electronic signature platform didn?t work and used email for signature during the technical issue. Moving forward, we will have both hard copy signature saved at AEDS office and electronic copy saved electronically in drop box.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-006
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Payments were made to small businesses directly and through cultural mall grants to the same small businesses. In addition, payments were made twice to the same small business. Criteria: The grant that the Organization received had two main objectives: grants to small businesses and grants to cultural malls. The cultural mall grants include payments to mall tenants. The State of Minnesota requires that grantees are not paid more than once in the form of either small business grants or cultural mall grants. Cause: The cultural mall request information was not reviewed thoroughly enough to find that payments were disallowed because of previous payment. In addition, previous payments were not reviewed thoroughly enough to ensure that small businesses were not receiving two payments from two applications and grants. Effect: Grantees were improperly paid twice. Recommendation: We recommend that grants be checked for accuracy or duplication before they are approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Payments were made to small businesses directly and through cultural mall grants to the same small businesses. In addition, payments were made twice to the same small business. Criteria: The grant that the Organization received had two main objectives: grants to small businesses and grants to cultural malls. The cultural mall grants include payments to mall tenants. The State of Minnesota requires that grantees are not paid more than once in the form of either small business grants or cultural mall grants. Cause: The cultural mall request information was not reviewed thoroughly enough to find that payments were disallowed because of previous payment. In addition, previous payments were not reviewed thoroughly enough to ensure that small businesses were not receiving two payments from two applications and grants. Effect: Grantees were improperly paid twice. Recommendation: We recommend that grants be checked for accuracy or duplication before they are approved.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-006 ? Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend that grants be checked for accuracy or duplication before they are approved. Planned Action: Moving forward we will have more staff work on checking for accuracy.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-007
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Organization did not present a payroll allocation report to support COVID-19 payroll distributions for employees whose work was not substantially dedicated to COVID-19 response. Criteria: Funds used for payroll sourced from the Coronavirus Relief Fund must be paid to employees who substantially use all of their time for COVID-19 response. Alternatively, the funds can be paid to employees for their time spent on COVID-19 response if they are not substantially dedicated to COVID-19 response and have a payroll activity report to support their time allocation. This payroll activity report must report real hours worked and cannot report estimated or budgeted hours worked on COVID-19 response. Cause: The Organization did not implement an effective strategy for tracking employee time spent working on COVID-19 projects. Effect: Payroll funds may have been spent from Federal funds that were not allowable. Recommendation: We recommend that payroll activity reports be kept when it is required by Federal funding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The Organization did not present a payroll allocation report to support COVID-19 payroll distributions for employees whose work was not substantially dedicated to COVID-19 response. Criteria: Funds used for payroll sourced from the Coronavirus Relief Fund must be paid to employees who substantially use all of their time for COVID-19 response. Alternatively, the funds can be paid to employees for their time spent on COVID-19 response if they are not substantially dedicated to COVID-19 response and have a payroll activity report to support their time allocation. This payroll activity report must report real hours worked and cannot report estimated or budgeted hours worked on COVID-19 response. Cause: The Organization did not implement an effective strategy for tracking employee time spent working on COVID-19 projects. Effect: Payroll funds may have been spent from Federal funds that were not allowable. Recommendation: We recommend that payroll activity reports be kept when it is required by Federal funding.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-007 ? Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend that payroll activity reports be kept when it is required by Federal funding. Planned Action: Moving forward we will be crosschecking before approving it.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.