EIN: 800163521
UEI: RDJPEGMWL4R8
Audited by: CBIZ CPAs P.C.
Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 25, 2026 (113 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Finding – Reporting – Congressional Grants; Assistance Listing Number 59.059; 9/1/22-8/31/27 Award Period, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria or Specific Requirement Recipients must use the standard financial reporting forms or such other forms as may be authorized by OMB when reporting to the federal awarding agency. Each recipient must report program outlays and program income on a cash or accrual basis, as prescribed by the federal awarding agency. Financial reporting requirements for cost reimbursement contracts subject to the FAR are contained in the terms and conditions of the contract. Non-profit entities may be required to submit performance reports at least annually but not more frequently than quarterly, using form or format authorized by OMB. (Financial reporting 2 CFR 200.327; Performance reporting 2 CFR 200.301 and 200.329). Condition and Context The Organization's federal award agreement requires SF-425 Federal Financial Report and a performance report to be filed annually. The Organization did not file these reports in 2025 as required. Cause The Organization did not follow the award agreement reporting requirements. Effect The Organization was not in compliance with the Federal Reporting compliance requirement. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that management review the reporting requirements in their federal award agreement to identify and file any required reports by applicable due dates. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding – Reporting – Congressional Grants; Assistance Listing Number 59.059; 9/1/22-8/31/27 Award Period, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria or Specific Requirement Recipients must use the standard financial reporting forms or such other forms as may be authorized by OMB when reporting to the federal awarding agency. Each recipient must report program outlays and program income on a cash or accrual basis, as prescribed by the federal awarding agency. Financial reporting requirements for cost reimbursement contracts subject to the FAR are contained in the terms and conditions of the contract. Non-profit entities may be required to submit performance reports at least annually but not more frequently than quarterly, using form or format authorized by OMB. (Financial reporting 2 CFR 200.327; Performance reporting 2 CFR 200.301 and 200.329). Condition and Context The Organization's federal award agreement requires SF-425 Federal Financial Report and a performance report to be filed annually. The Organization did not file these reports in 2025 as required. Cause The Organization did not follow the award agreement reporting requirements. Effect The Organization was not in compliance with the Federal Reporting compliance requirement. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend that management review the reporting requirements in their federal award agreement to identify and file any required reports by applicable due dates. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding: Reporting: Congressional Grants - The Organization's federal award agreement requires SF-425 Federal Financial Report and a performance report to be filed annually. The Organization did not file these reports in 2025 as required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is in agreement with this finding Below is the corrective action plan Management acknowledges that required grant reporting, including the SF-425 Federal Financial Report and annual performance report, was not submitted in accordance with the federal award agreement. This was due to a breakdown in tracking reporting deadlines and responsibilities. To address this matter, management will implement the following corrective actions: • Centralized Grant Compliance Tracking: Establish a comprehensive reporting calendar that includes all federal grant reporting requirements, due dates, and assigned responsible parties. • Assignment of Accountability: Designate a specific individual responsible for monitoring compliance with all grant reporting requirements and ensuring timely submission of required reports. • Formalized Review and Submission Process: Implement a standardized process requiring preparation, supervisory review, and documented approval of all grant-related reports prior to submission. • Periodic Compliance Monitoring: Conduct periodic (e.g., quarterly) reviews of grant agreements to confirm all reporting requirements are identified, tracked, and fulfilled. • Training and Awareness: Provide training to relevant personnel on federal grant compliance requirements, including reporting obligations and applicable deadlines. Responsible Official: Warren McLean Completion Date: June 30, 2026
Finding – Procurement, Suspension & Debarment - Congressional Grants; Assistance Listing Number 59.059; 9/1/22-8/31/27 Award Period, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria or Specific Requirement Non-federal entities other than states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition and Context One procurement transaction for a building construction contract which covers 100% of the major program expenditures was tested. We noted that the expenditures of the major program were for valid allowable activities and costs, however we noted that the procurement, suspension and debarment requirements for a procurement transaction over the simplified acquisition threshold were not followed including, not obtaining competitive bids, missing cost/price analysis, and selecting the contractor primarily on qualifications but without a valid noncompetitive justification. Also, the suspension and debarment search was not conducted however, we noted through a search that the contractor is not suspended or debarred. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause The Organization’s written procurement policy was not followed. Effect The procurement transaction for the federal award was not in compliance with the procurement requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Questioned Costs Undeterminable – Questioned costs are costs identified as potentially noncompliant due to a violation of a statute, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a federal award; where costs are not supported by adequate documentation or where costs incurred appear unreasonable, not reflecting actions a prudent person would take in the circumstances. The expenditure incurred was tested and determined to be for valid allowable activities and costs but was not in compliance with the procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization’s procurement policy for purchasing and contracting decisions be distributed and reviewed by all appropriate staff to ensure that the procurement policy is followed and procurement requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding – Procurement, Suspension & Debarment - Congressional Grants; Assistance Listing Number 59.059; 9/1/22-8/31/27 Award Period, U.S. Small Business Administration Criteria or Specific Requirement Non-federal entities other than states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition and Context One procurement transaction for a building construction contract which covers 100% of the major program expenditures was tested. We noted that the expenditures of the major program were for valid allowable activities and costs, however we noted that the procurement, suspension and debarment requirements for a procurement transaction over the simplified acquisition threshold were not followed including, not obtaining competitive bids, missing cost/price analysis, and selecting the contractor primarily on qualifications but without a valid noncompetitive justification. Also, the suspension and debarment search was not conducted however, we noted through a search that the contractor is not suspended or debarred. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause The Organization’s written procurement policy was not followed. Effect The procurement transaction for the federal award was not in compliance with the procurement requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Questioned Costs Undeterminable – Questioned costs are costs identified as potentially noncompliant due to a violation of a statute, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a federal award; where costs are not supported by adequate documentation or where costs incurred appear unreasonable, not reflecting actions a prudent person would take in the circumstances. The expenditure incurred was tested and determined to be for valid allowable activities and costs but was not in compliance with the procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization’s procurement policy for purchasing and contracting decisions be distributed and reviewed by all appropriate staff to ensure that the procurement policy is followed and procurement requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment: Congressional Grants - One procurement transaction for a building construction contract which covers 100% of the major program expenditures was tested. We noted that the expenditures of the major program were for valid allowable activities and costs however, we noted that the procurement, suspension and debarment requirements for a procurement transaction over the simplified acquisition threshold were not followed including, not obtaining competitive bids, missing cost/price analysis, and selecting the contractor primarily on qualifications but without a valid noncompetitive justification. Also, the suspension and debarment search was not conducted. valid. Management is in agreement with this finding. Below is the corrective action plan Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges that procurement procedures did not fully comply with federal requirements for procurements exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Specifically, required elements such as competitive bidding, cost/price analysis, formal justification for noncompetitive procurement, and suspension and debarment verification were not consistently performed or documented. To address this matter, management will implement the following corrective actions: • Formalized Procurement Policy Update: Update and formalize procurement policies to align with federal grant requirements, including specific guidance for procurements exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. • Competitive Procurement Procedures: Require documented competitive bidding or proposals for all applicable procurements unless a valid and documented sole-source or noncompetitive justification is approved in advance. • Cost/Price Analysis Requirement: Implement a standard requirement to perform and document cost or price analysis for all significant procurement transactions. • Suspension and Debarment Verification: Require documented verification (e.g., SAM.gov search) that all contractors are not suspended or debarred prior to contract award. • Enhanced Review and Oversight: Implement a secondary review control to ensure all procurement documentation is complete and compliant prior to contract execution and payment. • Training and Compliance Awareness: Provide training to relevant personnel on federal procurement requirements, including documentation standards and compliance expectations. Responsible Official Warren McLean Completion Date: The project was completed on December 30, 2025. Mortenson is the largest contractor in Minnesota, and the 5th largest contractor in the United States. They completed a very complex commercial kitchen, NEON Collective Kitchens, a 25,000 square foot facility, one of the 5 largest commercial kitchens in the country. Going forward, we will adhere to the corrective action plan that we outlined above.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
