EIN: 770323113
UEI: VS5KES5PLP58
Audited by: Chavan & Associates, LLP
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 19, 2026 (22 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2025 — management decision was due July 3, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2021 — management decision was due March 30, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2020 — management decision was due July 9, 2020.
During testing of Claims for Reimbursement, we noted the District utilized a percentage of total student population of free, reduced, and paid multiplied by the number of meals served in the month to determine the number of students by eligibility category (free, reduced, paid) to claim. doing so, the District did not report actual student counts by eligibility type as required. The District did not receive pre-approval to utilize an alternative method of claiming meals beyond actuals. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Due to the District?s misclassification of number of students by eligibility status, the District under reported Claims for Reimbursement by $13,265. Had the District correctly reported as indicated in criteria above, the District would have received $13,265 more in federal funding during the year. Cause: The District had software issues with loading student eligibility statuses to the point of sale system used to track student meals. Recommendation: We recommend the District enter the student eligibility status directly into the point of sale system used to track student meals to ensure that the support used to determine the Claims for Reimbursements are based on actuals instead of estimates. Corrective Action Plan: The District concords with the finding and had made the appropriate corrections. The District has revised the procedures to prevent this error from happening again. All meal application data is entered in the student nutrition services software Titan and the student eligibility status is automatically track to the point of sale.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Findings 2019-001: Eligibility - Student Status Claims (50000) Federal Program Information: 10.553 and 10.555 Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Grantor Agency: Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-Through Grantor Agency: California Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirements: Pursuant to Title 7 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations section 210.8(a) and 220.11(b), the school food authority, the District, shall establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. As well as, 210.8(a)(2) and 220.11(b)(2), the school food authority, prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, review the lunch/breakfast count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches/breakfasts served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such lunches/breakfast. Condition: During testing of Claims for Reimbursement, we noted the District utilized a percentage of total student population of free, reduced, and paid multiplied by the number of meals served in the month to determine the number of students by eligibility category (free, reduced, paid) to claim. doing so, the District did not report actual student counts by eligibility type as required. The District did not receive pre-approval to utilize an alternative method of claiming meals beyond actuals. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Due to the District?s misclassification of number of students by eligibility status, the District under reported Claims for Reimbursement by $13,265. Had the District correctly reported as indicated in criteria above, the District would have received $13,265 more in federal funding during the year. Cause: The District had software issues with loading student eligibility statuses to the point of sale system used to track student meals. Recommendation: We recommend the District enter the student eligibility status directly into the point of sale system used to track student meals to ensure that the support used to determine the Claims for Reimbursements are based on actuals instead of estimates. Corrective Action Plan: The District concords with the finding and had made the appropriate corrections. The District has revised the procedures to prevent this error from happening again. All meal application data is entered in the student nutrition services software Titan and the student eligibility status is automatically track to the point of sale.
Corrective Action Plan: The District concords with the finding and had made the appropriate corrections. The District has revised the procedures to prevent this error from happening again. All meal application data is entered in the student nutrition services software Titan and the student eligibility status is automatically track to the point of sale.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2019 — management decision was due July 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2018 — management decision was due July 7, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
