← Back to home

Carmel Unified School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 770322693

UEI: J4VVGN8D6CN3

Audited by: Christy White Inc

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Carmel Unified School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,371,814 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 9, 2026 (56 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,676,764 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,799,502 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2024 — management decision was due August 20, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,582,433 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2023 — management decision was due July 12, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred for 2 out of the 5 vendors tested. Questioned costs: None as none of the vendors selected were suspended or debarred. Context: There were a total of 7 vendors with contracts equaling or exceeding $25,000. Cause: The District was unaware that vendors were not being reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. This was a result of turnover in the department. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of vendors identified as suspended or debarred; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements resulted in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District design procedures and controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to determine vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Education Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of suspension and debarment. The District should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred for 2 out of the 5 vendors tested. Questioned costs: None as none of the vendors selected were suspended or debarred. Context: There were a total of 7 vendors with contracts equaling or exceeding $25,000. Cause: The District was unaware that vendors were not being reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. This was a result of turnover in the department. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of vendors identified as suspended or debarred; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements resulted in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District design procedures and controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to determine vendors are not suspended or debarred.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District will implement procedures in the 22-23 fiscal year to correct this compliance issue. District staff will follow procedures to verify that the District is not using vendors who are either suspended or debarred by the federal government, using the SAM.gov website. The following language has been communicated to CUSD staff and added to the District?s Business Users Guidelines Document. To process a requisition using Federal Monies (resource codes 3000-5999), staff shall perform the following procedures: Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities (2 CFR 200.213). To check if a vendor is disbarred or suspended: a. Go to the website at www.sam.gov (you do not need to register). b. Verify the status of the vendor by performing the following: ? Click on the search records icon on the top left. ? Use the "quick search" box and enter the vendor's name (leave remaining classifications blank) c. Click search at the bottom of the web page. d. Print a copy of the search results including if results were not found. e. If the vendor is not debarred, note on the requisition and / or contract if applicable, that the vendor has been checked in the SAM system and is not debarred. Include a copy of the printed page with the requisition. f. If a vendor search produces no results, print the page and attach as supporting documentation to the requisition. Note on the requisition and / or contract is applicable that the vendor has been checked in the SAM system. ? The District is prohibited from doing business with a vendor or individual that is debarred or suspended.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,750,729 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2022 — management decision was due August 16, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$972,641 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2020 — management decision was due June 16, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$789,954 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$816,838 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2018 — management decision was due June 14, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$865,831 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2018 — management decision was due July 28, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$925,579 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2017 — management decision was due August 1, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.