EIN: 770288737
UEI: PBWNXNDDAGP8
Audited by: Chavan and Associates, LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 19, 2026 (12 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2025 — management decision was due July 3, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2024 — management decision was due September 21, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2023 — management decision was due March 11, 2024.
Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the District?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Questioned Costs None reported Context Although the District?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The District?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect The District?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Cause The District?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the District continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the District?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Questioned Costs None reported Context Although the District?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The District?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect The District?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Cause The District?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the District continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2022-002 (50000) Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Number: 10.555, 10.553 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through: California Department of Education Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Management?s or Department?s Response We concur. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: Name of Responsible Person: Dr. John Pappalardo, Chief Financial Officer Correction Action Plan: We will perform revision of procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Implementation Date: Fiscal Year 2022-2023
FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2022 — management decision was due August 3, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2021 — management decision was due July 21, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2020 — management decision was due July 5, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2019 — management decision was due July 13, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2017 — management decision was due July 8, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
