← Back to home

City of San AngeloLocal Government

EIN: 756000659

UEI: KZC2VLA6F2P9

Audited by: Pattillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

City of San Angelo10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$12M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$11,963,262 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 17, 2026 (47 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

$16,610,386 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2025 — management decision was due October 16, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$13,211,698 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2024 — management decision was due November 6, 2024.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

There were noted instances of timecards initiated and approved by the same person, and there were instances of timecards calculating excessive overtime per payroll for two employees, one of which had the authority to approve the timecards. Cause: Approvals for overtime worked were provided by an employee who also entered and was paid for excessive overtime. She approved excessive overtime for herself and another employee. Effect: Overtime was paid to two employees for excessive overtime over several pay periods. Context: An automated timecard system is used by the department, but overrides were made to input and approve excessive overtime. Recommendation: Work with the automated timecard system company to provide reports of overrides made. Designate a department head that does not have access to overrides in the timecard system to approve all time worked. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Repeat Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Description: Overtime Approval Criteria: Timecards must be approved by department managers prior to payroll processing. Through this process, overtime must be approved. Condition: There were noted instances of timecards initiated and approved by the same person, and there were instances of timecards calculating excessive overtime per payroll for two employees, one of which had the authority to approve the timecards. Cause: Approvals for overtime worked were provided by an employee who also entered and was paid for excessive overtime. She approved excessive overtime for herself and another employee. Effect: Overtime was paid to two employees for excessive overtime over several pay periods. Context: An automated timecard system is used by the department, but overrides were made to input and approve excessive overtime. Recommendation: Work with the automated timecard system company to provide reports of overrides made. Designate a department head that does not have access to overrides in the timecard system to approve all time worked. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Assistant Director of Finance, Ryan Gaddy Corrective Action: Reports from the automated timecard system company have been identified to which provide exceptions for overrides made. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed Corrective Action: Work with automated timecard system company to designate a department head who does not have access to overrides in the timecard system to approve all time worked. Time entered will be first approved by the employee, secondly by the department timekeeper, and finally by the department manager/director. Timekeepers are unable to edit their own time; only the department manager/director will have the ability to edit the timekeeper’s time. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2024 Corrective Action: Overtime will no longer be manually input into timecard system; overtime will only be calculated by the timecard system. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2022-09-30

$8,147,496 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 8, 2023 — management decision was due November 8, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$14,710,097 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 18, 2022 — management decision was due October 18, 2022.

2021-001
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

A major program was not included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and was identified as a Federal program. Cause: The Federal program was administered by the City?s discretely presented component unit and its applicability to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards was not identified until the audit was nearing completion. Effect: The original Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards did not originally include a major program and was not included in the original major program determination. Context: Because this program was major and has not been audited in the prior two years, it was mandatory that this program be tested as a major program. Recommendation: The City should centralize all Federal programs to ensure completeness and compliance throughout the year and when the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is populated. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001: Major Program Not Captured on Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Type of Finding: Internal Control over Compliance (Material Weakness) Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200 requires that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards report all expenditures of the government expended in the year under audit. Condition: A major program was not included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and was identified as a Federal program. Cause: The Federal program was administered by the City?s discretely presented component unit and its applicability to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards was not identified until the audit was nearing completion. Effect: The original Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards did not originally include a major program and was not included in the original major program determination. Context: Because this program was major and has not been audited in the prior two years, it was mandatory that this program be tested as a major program. Recommendation: The City should centralize all Federal programs to ensure completeness and compliance throughout the year and when the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is populated. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Findings Relating to Compliance 2021-001 Major Program Not Captured on Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Corrective Action: Assistant Director of Finance, Ryan Gaddy: City staff has hired a Grant Accountant who is involved with grant activity on a daily basis. At the beginning of the audit, the Grant Accountant will retrieve a listing of grants from the general ledger revenues and expenditures accounts to ensure all grants are identified, including those for the Development Corporation.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-09-30

$3,452,150 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2021 — management decision was due October 29, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$4,131,576 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2020 — management decision was due October 19, 2020.

2019-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The process to properly accrue expenses at fiscal year-end was not adequately performed. Cause: Invoices received subsequent to year end with service periods in the current fiscal year were not thoroughly reviewed to accrue the expenses related to the current fiscal year. Effect: Liabilities and expenses were understated because some expenses applicable to the fiscal year were not properly accrued as of fiscal year-end. Context: Adjustments required to record transactions in their proper period could be material to the financial statements. Recommendation: Invoices received subsequent to fiscal year end should be carefully reviewed to accrue expenses related to service periods in the current fiscal year. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 Cut-Off Type of Finding: Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: Generally accepted accounting principles require that expenses be recorded in the period in which they are incurred. Condition: The process to properly accrue expenses at fiscal year-end was not adequately performed. Cause: Invoices received subsequent to year end with service periods in the current fiscal year were not thoroughly reviewed to accrue the expenses related to the current fiscal year. Effect: Liabilities and expenses were understated because some expenses applicable to the fiscal year were not properly accrued as of fiscal year-end. Context: Adjustments required to record transactions in their proper period could be material to the financial statements. Recommendation: Invoices received subsequent to fiscal year end should be carefully reviewed to accrue expenses related to service periods in the current fiscal year. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Assistant Director of Finance, Ryan Gaddy: Accounting staff will manually review vendor payments to determine that activity received subsequent to the year-end is properly accrued. Further, a secondary review of recurring vendor payments and payments in excess of $50,000 will be completed.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-09-30

$6,629,206 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 7, 2019 — management decision was due October 7, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

GOING CONCERN$4,488,304 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2018 — management decision was due November 24, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$3,231,901 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2017 — management decision was due September 16, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.