EIN: 750800642
UEI: CGJAJY5KL261
Audited by: Beasley, Mitchell & Co.
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 29, 2026 (76 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2025 — management decision was due November 7, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2024 — management decision was due December 1, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2023 — management decision was due November 30, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 26, 2022 — management decision was due November 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on May 26, 2021 — management decision was due November 26, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2020 — management decision was due December 1, 2020.
Credit card statements being paid did not always indicate the proper approval or have all of the support for the credit card charges. Expenses shown as pertaining to one grant on the approved check request were sometimes posted to a different grant in the books. Credit card balances on the books at year-end did not properly reflect the actual credit card payable balance as of August 31, 2019. Criteria: All disbursements should be property authorized, supported and recorded. Cause: Credit card receipts are sometimes missing. There is more than one version of the Organization?s check request being used which is causing confusion and inconsistency. Sales tax and tips paid are not being treated consistently as some employees report these items separately but others do not. Proper grant posting was not verified, and neither the supporting documentation nor the posting in the books were corrected when discrepancies occurred. Effect: Credit card disbursements may not be properly authorized or supported. Documentation and transaction postings are sometimes inconsistent. Sales tax is being paid on some credit card purchases even though the Organization is exempt from sales tax. Tips are an unallowed cost under Federal and State grants, but are sometimes being charged to grants anyway. Recommendation: Improvement is needed in credit card documentation, processing and procedures to ensure that all credit card disbursements are properly authorized, properly posted and supported. Everyone should use the same standard check request form. Credit card policy should always be followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Improvement will be made in Credit Card Processing by retraining staff on the importance of retaining supporting documentation. The Accounts Payable employee and the employees with credit cards will be held responsible for improper documentation and the correction of that supporting documentation. Family Support Services? policies and procedures are clearly written on this issue.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-001 Credit Card Disbursements Condition: Credit card statements being paid did not always indicate the proper approval or have all of the support for the credit card charges. Expenses shown as pertaining to one grant on the approved check request were sometimes posted to a different grant in the books. Credit card balances on the books at year-end did not properly reflect the actual credit card payable balance as of August 31, 2019. Criteria: All disbursements should be property authorized, supported and recorded. Cause: Credit card receipts are sometimes missing. There is more than one version of the Organization?s check request being used which is causing confusion and inconsistency. Sales tax and tips paid are not being treated consistently as some employees report these items separately but others do not. Proper grant posting was not verified, and neither the supporting documentation nor the posting in the books were corrected when discrepancies occurred. Effect: Credit card disbursements may not be properly authorized or supported. Documentation and transaction postings are sometimes inconsistent. Sales tax is being paid on some credit card purchases even though the Organization is exempt from sales tax. Tips are an unallowed cost under Federal and State grants, but are sometimes being charged to grants anyway. Recommendation: Improvement is needed in credit card documentation, processing and procedures to ensure that all credit card disbursements are properly authorized, properly posted and supported. Everyone should use the same standard check request form. Credit card policy should always be followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Improvement will be made in Credit Card Processing by retraining staff on the importance of retaining supporting documentation. The Accounts Payable employee and the employees with credit cards will be held responsible for improper documentation and the correction of that supporting documentation. Family Support Services? policies and procedures are clearly written on this issue.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Correction will be made in Credit Card Processing by retraining staff on the importance of retaining supporting documentation. The Accounts Payable employee and the employees with credit cards will be held responsible for improper documentation and the correction of that supporting documentation. Family Support Services? policies and procedures are clearly written on this issue.
Check disbursements did not always indicate the proper approval or have all of the support for the disbursement. Criteria: All disbursements should be property authorized and supported. Cause: Check requests are sometimes missing support. Support does not agree to the disbursement. Established accounting policy is not always being followed. There is more than one version of the Organization?s check request being used which is causing confusion and inconsistency. Effect: Disbursements by check do not always have proper documentation and are not always properly authorized. Recommendation: Improvement is needed in disbursement processing and procedures to ensure that all check disbursements are properly authorized and supported. Employees should adhere to the established accounting policies for payables and disbursements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staff will be retrained in accounts payable policies and that no disbursement will be made without proper documentation. We have issued a new check request form to all Directors that must be used. No other variation will be accepted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: Check disbursements did not always indicate the proper approval or have all of the support for the disbursement. Criteria: All disbursements should be property authorized and supported. Cause: Check requests are sometimes missing support. Support does not agree to the disbursement. Established accounting policy is not always being followed. There is more than one version of the Organization?s check request being used which is causing confusion and inconsistency. Effect: Disbursements by check do not always have proper documentation and are not always properly authorized. Recommendation: Improvement is needed in disbursement processing and procedures to ensure that all check disbursements are properly authorized and supported. Employees should adhere to the established accounting policies for payables and disbursements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staff will be retrained in accounts payable policies and that no disbursement will be made without proper documentation. We have issued a new check request form to all Directors that must be used. No other variation will be accepted.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staff will be retrained in accounts payable policies and that no disbursement will be made without proper documentation. We have issued a new check request form to all Directors that must be used. No other variation will be accepted.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
