EIN: 746029841
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: BRIAN L. JARVIS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 22, 2022 (1470 days ago).
What is a management decision? →One quarterly report was not submitted until 96 days after the due date. The final quarterly report was not submitted until 112 days after the due date. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The District relied on its 3rd party contract grant administrator to fulfill this requirement. Effect: The District did not timely submit a report required under the grant agreements. Recommendation: The District should implement processes to monitor the 3rd party grant administrator to ensure deadlines are met.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant Name: Emergency Watershed Protection Program Grant Award Numbers: NR187442XXXXC029 & NR187442XXXXC016 Context and Criteria: The grant agreements require quarterly reports to be submitted on the final day of the month following each quarter. The final quarterly report is due 90 days after completion of the grant. Condition: One quarterly report was not submitted until 96 days after the due date. The final quarterly report was not submitted until 112 days after the due date. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The District relied on its 3rd party contract grant administrator to fulfill this requirement. Effect: The District did not timely submit a report required under the grant agreements. Recommendation: The District should implement processes to monitor the 3rd party grant administrator to ensure deadlines are met.
Views of responsible officials: In the realization that this report was not submitted by the District?s grant administrator, the District spoke to the administrator regarding these reports and was made aware of some turnover within the grant administrator?s department. Regarding the final quarterly report, it appears that the grant administrator was in communication with NRCS prior to the due date regarding this report, however it was not finalized in time. The District has implemented a process to track the reporting requirements to ensure future deadlines are not missed.
As-built drawings were not submitted. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The as-built drawings should have been provided by the contractor awarded the bid. However, the contractor did not provide the as-built drawings to the District and the District relied on its 3rd party contract grant administrator to monitor this requirement. Effect: As-built drawings were not submitted to the grantor. Recommendation: The District should implement processes to monitor the 3rd party grant administrator to ensure deadlines are met.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant Name: Emergency Watershed Protection Program Grant Award Number: NR187442XXXXC029 Context and Criteria: The grant agreement required as built drawings of the final construction signed by a licensed professional engineer be submitted within 30 days of construction completion. Condition: As-built drawings were not submitted. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The as-built drawings should have been provided by the contractor awarded the bid. However, the contractor did not provide the as-built drawings to the District and the District relied on its 3rd party contract grant administrator to monitor this requirement. Effect: As-built drawings were not submitted to the grantor. Recommendation: The District should implement processes to monitor the 3rd party grant administrator to ensure deadlines are met.
Views of responsible officials: The District spoke to the grant administrator regarding submission of the as-built drawing for final construction. The District was made aware that the contractor was responsible for the submission of the drawings and they were never received. The grant administrator has decided to proceed with completing the drawings instead of relying on the contractor to provide them. The drawings for the next phase of the grant are being completed now to avoid this in the future.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
