EIN: 746002426
UEI: FBPBQ76QPXF6
Audited by: Garza/Gonzalez & Associates, LLC
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 9, 2026 (31 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 31, 2024 — management decision was due July 1, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2024 — management decision was due July 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2022 — management decision was due June 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2021 — management decision was due June 16, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2020 — management decision was due June 17, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
Finding 2019-III-01 ? Special Tests and Provisions/ Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Type of Finding ? Non-Compliance CFDA No. 84.010 Title I Questioned Costs: $0 Criteria: The District is required to have implemented appropriate policies and procedures for documenting the removal of a student from regulatory adjusted cohort. To remove a student from the cohort, a school or LEA must confirm, in writing, that the student transferred out, emigrated to another country, transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased. To confirm that a student transferred out, the school or LEA must have official written documentation that the student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. A student who is retained in grade, enrolls in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted as having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort (ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(25), (23)). Condition & Effect: Our testing detected the following: ? Three (3) out of ten (10) student withdrawal forms requested were not provided. ? Two (2) out of ten (10) student withdrawal forms were not properly signed by the Parent/Guardian. ? Written guidelines have not been implemented to document the District?s current practice of identifying, accounting and reporting the student leaver information through the TSDS PEIMS. Based on the above it appears that the District has not fully implemented appropriate policies and procedures for documenting the removal of a student from regulatory adjusted cohort. Recommendation We recommend the District ensure leaver related forms are properly completed and maintained and that leaver policies and procedures be documented in writing to ensure compliance with reporting requirements and schedules.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-III-01 ? Special Tests and Provisions/ Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Type of Finding ? Non-Compliance CFDA No. 84.010 Title I Questioned Costs: $0 Criteria: The District is required to have implemented appropriate policies and procedures for documenting the removal of a student from regulatory adjusted cohort. To remove a student from the cohort, a school or LEA must confirm, in writing, that the student transferred out, emigrated to another country, transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased. To confirm that a student transferred out, the school or LEA must have official written documentation that the student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. A student who is retained in grade, enrolls in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted as having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort (ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(25), (23)). Condition & Effect: Our testing detected the following: ? Three (3) out of ten (10) student withdrawal forms requested were not provided. ? Two (2) out of ten (10) student withdrawal forms were not properly signed by the Parent/Guardian. ? Written guidelines have not been implemented to document the District?s current practice of identifying, accounting and reporting the student leaver information through the TSDS PEIMS. Based on the above it appears that the District has not fully implemented appropriate policies and procedures for documenting the removal of a student from regulatory adjusted cohort. Recommendation We recommend the District ensure leaver related forms are properly completed and maintained and that leaver policies and procedures be documented in writing to ensure compliance with reporting requirements and schedules.
Finding 2019-III-01 ? Special Tests and Provisions/ Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Type of Finding ? Non-Compliance CFDA No. 84.010 Title I Questioned Costs: $0 Planned Corrective Action/Views of Responsible officials: ? Monthly PEIMS clerk meetings will be conducted and documented by Cash Keith, Technology Director, to review student ?leavers? as per office records and student-level data submitted to the TEA. o ?Leavers? will be identified and subsequently, the folder of each ?leaver? will be reviewed for compliance by PEIMS clerks and the Technology Director for compliance. o In this review, withdrawal forms and necessary documents will be individually reviewed for each ?leaver?. o Instances of non-compliance will be corrected immediately if possible. ? A training, already conducted at the beginning of the year, will address critical compliance items for ?leavers? including each audit compliance element on the withdrawal form. Cash Keith, all campus principals, secretaries and PEIMS clerks were in attendance. ? An annual review of cumulative folders of all ?leavers? will be conducted by Cash Keith to include principals, and PEIMS clerks, to review the withdrawal forms and documentation necessary for compliance with each ?leaver?. The review will be documented, with copies of documentation provided to the superintendent. ? Cash Keith will be responsible for following up to correct omissions, errors, and instances of non-compliance in each ?leaver? student folder. Remaining incidents of non-compliance will be reported to the superintendent. Responsible Person: ? Cash Keith, District Technology Director ? Campus Principals ? Campus Secretaries ? PEIMS Clerks
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2019 — management decision was due July 7, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2018 — management decision was due August 14, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2017 — management decision was due August 12, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
